On trailing earnings, WFC is cheaper: V trades at a 30.58 P/E and WFC at 13.16.

Which has grown faster, V or WFC?

Over the past five years, V grew revenue faster — V at a 15.04% CAGR versus WFC at 9.46%.

Does V or WFC pay a bigger dividend?

V yields 0.76% and WFC yields 2.09% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is V or WFC more profitable?

V runs the higher net margin — V at 51.68% versus WFC at 17.29%.

Which has been the better investment, V or WFC?

Over the past 10-year, V delivered the higher annualized total return — V at 17.91% versus WFC at 9.15%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Visa Inc. (V) vs Wells Fargo & Company (WFC)

WFC leads on 8 of 14 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Visa Inc. and Wells Fargo & Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 2, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Visa Inc.

$694.14B

$362.13Financial Services

WFC

Wells Fargo & Company

$261.68B

$85.51Financial Services

Total return — V vs WFC

growth of $100 · last 18y

V +2452.6%WFC +171.1%V compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

V WFC

V vs WFC: by the numbers

•V is the larger company ($694.14B vs $261.68B market cap).
•WFC trades at the lower earnings multiple (13.16 vs 30.58 P/E).
•V converts more revenue to profit (51.68% vs 17.29% net margin).
•V grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.04% vs 9.46% CAGR).
•WFC pays the higher dividend yield (2.09% vs 0.76%).

Which is better, V or WFC?

Metric tally: V 6 · WFC 8

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueWFC(lower P/E)

GrowthV(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeWFC(higher dividend yield)

QualityV(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	V	WFC
P/E ratio	30.58	13.16●
Forward P/E	23.55	12.27●
P/S ratio	15.77	2.20●
P/B ratio	19.03	1.55●
PEG ratio	6.78	0.82●

Profitability

Metric	V	WFC
Gross margin	81.29%●	64.55%
Operating margin	61.12%●	20.47%
Net margin	51.68%●	17.29%
ROE	62.35%●	12.18%
ROIC	28.36%●	3.16%

Dividends

Metric	V	WFC
Dividend yield	0.76%	2.09%●
Payout ratio	26.22%	28.17%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	V	WFC
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	15.04%●	9.46%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	15.84%	72.38%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	9.43%	16.45%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, V or WFC?: It depends on your goal. value: WFC (lower P/E); growth: V (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: WFC (higher dividend yield); quality: V (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, WFC leads 8 to 6.
Is V or WFC cheaper?: On trailing earnings, WFC is cheaper: V trades at a 30.58 P/E and WFC at 13.16.
Which has grown faster, V or WFC?: Over the past five years, V grew revenue faster — V at a 15.04% CAGR versus WFC at 9.46%.
Does V or WFC pay a bigger dividend?: V yields 0.76% and WFC yields 2.09% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is V or WFC more profitable?: V runs the higher net margin — V at 51.68% versus WFC at 17.29%.
Which has been the better investment, V or WFC?: Over the past 10-year, V delivered the higher annualized total return — V at 17.91% versus WFC at 9.15%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 2, 2026.