Mastercard Incorporated (MA) vs Wells Fargo & Company (WFC)
WFC leads on 8 of 14 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Mastercard Incorporated and Wells Fargo & Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
MA
Mastercard Incorporated
$489.98Financial Services
WFC
Wells Fargo & Company
$83.73Financial Services
Total return — MA vs WFC
growth of $100 · last 20yMA +10551.7%WFC +149.9%MA compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
MA WFC
MA vs WFC: by the numbers
- •MA is the larger company ($432.94B vs $256.26B market cap).
- •WFC trades at the lower earnings multiple (12.82 vs 28.36 P/E).
- •MA converts more revenue to profit (45.88% vs 17.29% net margin).
- •MA grew revenue faster over the past five years (17.05% vs 9.46% CAGR).
- •WFC pays the higher dividend yield (2.15% vs 0.67%).
Which is better, MA or WFC?
Metric tally: MA 6 · WFC 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueWFC(lower P/E)
GrowthMA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeWFC(higher dividend yield)
QualityMA(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | MA | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 28.36 | 12.82● |
| Forward P/E | 21.48 | 11.96● |
| P/S ratio | 12.89 | 2.14● |
| P/B ratio | 65.09 | 1.51● |
| PEG ratio | 1.81 | 0.79● |
Profitability
| Metric | MA | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 82.96%● | 64.55% |
| Operating margin | 59.40%● | 20.47% |
| Net margin | 45.88%● | 17.29% |
| ROE | 231.63%● | 12.18% |
| ROIC | 48.63%● | 3.16% |
Dividends
| Metric | MA | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.67% | 2.15%● |
| Payout ratio | 19.70% | 28.17% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MA | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 17.05%● | 9.46% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 20.93% | 72.38%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 6.65% | 15.64%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, MA or WFC?
- It depends on your goal. value: WFC (lower P/E); growth: MA (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: WFC (higher dividend yield); quality: MA (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, WFC leads 8 to 6.
- Is MA or WFC cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, WFC is cheaper: MA trades at a 28.36 P/E and WFC at 12.82.
- Which has grown faster, MA or WFC?
- Over the past five years, MA grew revenue faster — MA at a 17.05% CAGR versus WFC at 9.46%.
- Does MA or WFC pay a bigger dividend?
- MA yields 0.67% and WFC yields 2.15% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is MA or WFC more profitable?
- MA runs the higher net margin — MA at 45.88% versus WFC at 17.29%.
- Which has been the better investment, MA or WFC?
- Over the past 10-year, MA delivered the higher annualized total return — MA at 18.49% versus WFC at 8.61%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Mastercard P/E ratioWells Fargo & P/E ratioMastercard dividend yieldWells Fargo & dividend yieldMastercard ROEWells Fargo & ROEMastercard operating marginWells Fargo & operating marginMastercard revenue growthWells Fargo & revenue growthMastercard free cash flowWells Fargo & free cash flow
Mastercard & Wells Fargo & appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.