Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) vs The Procter & Gamble Company (PG)
MNST leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics, though PG is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Monster Beverage Corporation and The Procter & Gamble Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
$92.83Consumer Defensive
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
$149.61Consumer Defensive
Total return — MNST vs PG
growth of $100 · last 30yMNST +509143.5%PG +575.4%MNST compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
MNST PG
MNST vs PG: by the numbers
- •PG is the larger company ($348.38B vs $90.79B market cap).
- •PG trades at the lower earnings multiple (21.87 vs 44.85 P/E).
- •MNST converts more revenue to profit (23.11% vs 19.22% net margin).
- •MNST grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.96% vs 2.98% CAGR).
- •PG pays a dividend (2.85% yield) while MNST does not currently pay one.
Which is better, MNST or PG?
Metric tally: MNST 9 · PG 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValuePG(lower P/E)
GrowthMNST(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityMNST(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | MNST | PG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 44.85 | 21.87● |
| Forward P/E | 35.95 | 21.17● |
| P/S ratio | 10.43 | 4.17● |
| P/B ratio | 10.51 | 6.63● |
| PEG ratio | 1.31● | 3.09 |
| EV / EBITDA | 32.31 | 16.61● |
| FCF yield | 2.26% | 4.16%● |
Profitability
| Metric | MNST | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 55.47%● | 50.33% |
| Operating margin | 29.34%● | 23.24% |
| Net margin | 23.11%● | 19.22% |
| ROE | 23.28% | 30.58%● |
| ROIC | 21.74%● | 16.47% |
Dividends
| Metric | MNST | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 2.85% |
| Payout ratio | — | 63.85% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MNST | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 12.96%● | 2.98% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 7.95%● | 5.39% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 10.53%● | -1.64% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 14.70%● | 4.73% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, MNST or PG?
- It depends on your goal. value: PG (lower P/E); growth: MNST (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: MNST (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MNST leads 9 to 7.
- Is MNST or PG cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, PG is cheaper: MNST trades at a 44.85 P/E and PG at 21.87.
- Which has grown faster, MNST or PG?
- Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — MNST at a 12.96% CAGR versus PG at 2.98%.
- Does MNST or PG pay a bigger dividend?
- PG pays a dividend (2.85% yield) while MNST does not currently pay one.
- Is MNST or PG more profitable?
- MNST runs the higher net margin — MNST at 23.11% versus PG at 19.22%.
- Which has been the better investment, MNST or PG?
- Over the past 10-year, MNST delivered the higher annualized total return — MNST at 13.75% versus PG at 8.98%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Monster Beverage P/E ratioProcter & Gamble P/E ratioMonster Beverage dividend yieldProcter & Gamble dividend yieldMonster Beverage ROEProcter & Gamble ROEMonster Beverage operating marginProcter & Gamble operating marginMonster Beverage revenue growthProcter & Gamble revenue growthMonster Beverage free cash flowProcter & Gamble free cash flow
Monster Beverage & Procter & Gamble appear in these rankings
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.