Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) vs The Procter & Gamble Company (PG)
A side-by-side comparison of Monster Beverage Corporation and The Procter & Gamble Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
$43.40Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
$145.27Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT
Total return — MNST vs PG
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yMNST +261.3% (+13.7%/yr)PG +112.8% (+7.8%/yr)MNST compounded faster over this window
MNST PG
MNST vs PG: by the numbers
- •PG is the larger company ($345.34B vs $84.89B market cap).
- •PG trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (21.94 vs 40.00 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •MNST converts more revenue to profit (23.08% vs 18.44% net margin).
- •MNST grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.36% vs 2.72% CAGR).
- •PG pays a dividend (3.01% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | MNST | PG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 40.00 | 21.94 |
| Forward P/E | 37.40 | 20.82 |
| P/S ratio | 9.21 | 3.97 |
| P/B ratio | 9.07 | 6.36 |
| EV / EBITDA | 28.61 | 16.17 |
| FCF yield | 2.47% | 4.61% |
Profitability
| Metric | MNST | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 55.55% | 50.18% |
| Operating margin | 29.16% | 22.69% |
| Net margin | 23.08% | 18.44% |
| ROE | 22.72% | 29.54% |
| ROIC | 21.32% | 15.78% |
Dividends
| Metric | MNST | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 3.01% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 64.81% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MNST | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 12.36% | 2.72% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 7.95% | 3.48% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 7.93% | 0.42% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 12.44% | 2.41% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, MNST or PG?
- PG has the lower trailing P/E: MNST trades at 40.00 and PG at 21.94. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, MNST or PG?
- Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — MNST at a 12.36% CAGR versus PG at 2.72%.
- Does MNST or PG pay a bigger dividend?
- PG pays a dividend (3.01% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
- Is MNST or PG more profitable?
- MNST runs the higher net margin — MNST at 23.08% versus PG at 18.44%.
- How have MNST and PG total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, MNST delivered 13.35% and PG delivered 8.07% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Monster Beverage P/E ratioProcter & Gamble P/E ratioProcter & Gamble dividend yieldMonster Beverage ROEProcter & Gamble ROEMonster Beverage operating marginProcter & Gamble operating marginMonster Beverage revenue growthProcter & Gamble revenue growthMonster Beverage free cash flowProcter & Gamble free cash flow
Monster Beverage & Procter & Gamble appear in these rankings
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.