Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) vs PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP)
A side-by-side comparison of Monster Beverage Corporation and PepsiCo, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
$43.40Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
PEP
PepsiCo, Inc.
$136.32Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — MNST vs PEP
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yMNST +243.6% (+13.1%/yr)PEP +78.1% (+5.9%/yr)MNST compounded faster over this window
MNST PEP
MNST vs PEP: by the numbers
- •PEP is the larger company ($186.21B vs $84.89B market cap).
- •PEP trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (17.87 vs 40.00 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •MNST converts more revenue to profit (23.08% vs 10.82% net margin).
- •MNST grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.36% vs 5.37% CAGR).
- •PEP pays a dividend (4.25% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | MNST | PEP |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 40.00 | 17.87 |
| Forward P/E | 37.40 | 15.94 |
| P/S ratio | 9.21 | 1.92 |
| P/B ratio | 9.07 | 8.43 |
| EV / EBITDA | 28.61 | 12.16 |
| FCF yield | 2.47% | 4.98% |
Profitability
| Metric | MNST | PEP |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 55.55% | 53.96% |
| Operating margin | 29.16% | 14.96% |
| Net margin | 23.08% | 10.82% |
| ROE | 22.72% | 47.45% |
| ROIC | 21.32% | 13.22% |
Dividends
| Metric | MNST | PEP |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 4.25% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 76.08% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MNST | PEP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 12.36% | 5.37% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 7.95% | 3.25% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 7.93% | 5.40% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 12.44% | 0.63% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, MNST or PEP?
- PEP has the lower trailing P/E: MNST trades at 40.00 and PEP at 17.87. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, MNST or PEP?
- Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — MNST at a 12.36% CAGR versus PEP at 5.37%.
- Does MNST or PEP pay a bigger dividend?
- PEP pays a dividend (4.25% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
- Is MNST or PEP more profitable?
- MNST runs the higher net margin — MNST at 23.08% versus PEP at 10.82%.
- How have MNST and PEP total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, MNST delivered 13.35% and PEP delivered 6.00% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Monster Beverage P/E ratioPepsiCo P/E ratioPepsiCo dividend yieldMonster Beverage ROEPepsiCo ROEMonster Beverage operating marginPepsiCo operating marginMonster Beverage revenue growthPepsiCo revenue growthMonster Beverage free cash flowPepsiCo free cash flow
Monster Beverage & PepsiCo appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.