Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) vs PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP)
A side-by-side comparison of Monster Beverage Corporation and PepsiCo, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
$97.74Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
PEP
PepsiCo, Inc.
$142.86Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — MNST vs PEP
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30yMNST +457491.3%PEP +819.5%MNST compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
MNST PEP
MNST vs PEP: by the numbers
- •PEP is the larger company ($195.15B vs $95.59B market cap).
- •PEP trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (18.32 vs 46.05 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •MNST converts more revenue to profit (23.11% vs 10.82% net margin).
- •MNST grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.96% vs 5.37% CAGR).
- •PEP pays a dividend (4.11% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | MNST | PEP |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 46.05 | 18.32 |
| Forward P/E | 41.41 | 16.34 |
| P/S ratio | 10.71 | 1.97 |
| P/B ratio | 10.80 | 8.66 |
| PEG ratio | 1.31 | 7.63 |
| EV / EBITDA | 34.17 | 12.43 |
| FCF yield | 2.20% | 4.85% |
Profitability
| Metric | MNST | PEP |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 55.47% | 53.96% |
| Operating margin | 29.34% | 14.96% |
| Net margin | 23.11% | 10.82% |
| ROE | 23.28% | 47.45% |
| ROIC | 21.74% | 13.29% |
Dividends
| Metric | MNST | PEP |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 4.11% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 95.32% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MNST | PEP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 12.96% | 5.37% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 7.95% | 2.40% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 10.53% | 5.40% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 14.91% | 0.72% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, MNST or PEP?
- PEP has the lower trailing P/E: MNST trades at 46.05 and PEP at 18.32. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, MNST or PEP?
- Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — MNST at a 12.96% CAGR versus PEP at 5.37%.
- Does MNST or PEP pay a bigger dividend?
- PEP pays a dividend (4.11% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
- Is MNST or PEP more profitable?
- MNST runs the higher net margin — MNST at 23.11% versus PEP at 10.82%.
- How have MNST and PEP total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, MNST delivered 13.77% and PEP delivered 5.85% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Monster Beverage P/E ratioPepsiCo P/E ratioMonster Beverage dividend yieldPepsiCo dividend yieldMonster Beverage ROEPepsiCo ROEMonster Beverage operating marginPepsiCo operating marginMonster Beverage revenue growthPepsiCo revenue growthMonster Beverage free cash flowPepsiCo free cash flow
Monster Beverage & PepsiCo appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.