Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) vs PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP)
MNST leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics, though PEP is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Monster Beverage Corporation and PepsiCo, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
$92.83Consumer Defensive
PEP
PepsiCo, Inc.
$144.27Consumer Defensive
Total return — MNST vs PEP
growth of $100 · last 30yMNST +509143.5%PEP +330.7%MNST compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
MNST PEP
MNST vs PEP: by the numbers
- •PEP is the larger company ($197.21B vs $90.79B market cap).
- •PEP trades at the lower earnings multiple (22.65 vs 44.85 P/E).
- •MNST converts more revenue to profit (23.11% vs 9.16% net margin).
- •MNST grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.96% vs 6.00% CAGR).
- •PEP pays a dividend (3.98% yield) while MNST does not currently pay one.
Which is better, MNST or PEP?
Metric tally: MNST 9 · PEP 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValuePEP(lower P/E)
GrowthMNST(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityMNST(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | MNST | PEP |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 44.85 | 22.65● |
| Forward P/E | 35.95 | 15.81● |
| P/S ratio | 10.43 | 2.07● |
| P/B ratio | 10.51 | 9.25● |
| PEG ratio | 1.31● | 9.44 |
| EV / EBITDA | 32.31 | 15.92● |
| FCF yield | 2.26% | 4.47%● |
Profitability
| Metric | MNST | PEP |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 55.47%● | 54.06% |
| Operating margin | 29.34%● | 14.79% |
| Net margin | 23.11%● | 9.16% |
| ROE | 23.28% | 40.89%● |
| ROIC | 21.74%● | 13.29% |
Dividends
| Metric | MNST | PEP |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 3.98% |
| Payout ratio | — | 95.32% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MNST | PEP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 12.96%● | 6.00% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 7.95%● | 2.40% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 10.53%● | 6.62% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 14.70%● | 2.72% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, MNST or PEP?
- It depends on your goal. value: PEP (lower P/E); growth: MNST (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: MNST (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MNST leads 9 to 7.
- Is MNST or PEP cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, PEP is cheaper: MNST trades at a 44.85 P/E and PEP at 22.65.
- Which has grown faster, MNST or PEP?
- Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — MNST at a 12.96% CAGR versus PEP at 6.00%.
- Does MNST or PEP pay a bigger dividend?
- PEP pays a dividend (3.98% yield) while MNST does not currently pay one.
- Is MNST or PEP more profitable?
- MNST runs the higher net margin — MNST at 23.11% versus PEP at 9.16%.
- Which has been the better investment, MNST or PEP?
- Over the past 10-year, MNST delivered the higher annualized total return — MNST at 13.75% versus PEP at 6.61%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Monster Beverage P/E ratioPepsiCo P/E ratioMonster Beverage dividend yieldPepsiCo dividend yieldMonster Beverage ROEPepsiCo ROEMonster Beverage operating marginPepsiCo operating marginMonster Beverage revenue growthPepsiCo revenue growthMonster Beverage free cash flowPepsiCo free cash flow
Monster Beverage & PepsiCo appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.