The Coca-Cola Company (KO) vs The Procter & Gamble Company (PG)
A side-by-side comparison of The Coca-Cola Company and The Procter & Gamble Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
$88.29Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
$145.27Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT
Total return — KO vs PG
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yKO +175.8% (+10.7%/yr)PG +112.8% (+7.8%/yr)KO compounded faster over this window
KO PG
KO vs PG: by the numbers
- •KO is the larger company ($379.87B vs $345.34B market cap).
- •PG trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (21.94 vs 26.51 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •KO converts more revenue to profit (28.56% vs 18.44% net margin).
- •KO grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.60% vs 2.72% CAGR).
- •PG pays the higher dividend yield (3.01% vs 2.37%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | KO | PG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 26.51 | 21.94 |
| Forward P/E | 26.71 | 20.82 |
| P/S ratio | 7.58 | 3.97 |
| P/B ratio | 10.51 | 6.36 |
| EV / EBITDA | 25.84 | 16.17 |
| FCF yield | 3.76% | 4.61% |
Profitability
| Metric | KO | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 61.89% | 50.18% |
| Operating margin | 29.63% | 22.69% |
| Net margin | 28.56% | 18.44% |
| ROE | 39.60% | 29.54% |
| ROIC | 13.91% | 15.78% |
Dividends
| Metric | KO | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.37% | 3.01% |
| Payout ratio | 62.46% | 64.81% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | KO | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 6.60% | 2.72% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 11.12% | 3.48% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -9.38% | 0.42% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 12.87% | 2.41% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, KO or PG?
- PG has the lower trailing P/E: KO trades at 26.51 and PG at 21.94. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, KO or PG?
- Over the past five years, KO grew revenue faster — KO at a 6.60% CAGR versus PG at 2.72%.
- Does KO or PG pay a bigger dividend?
- KO yields 2.37% and PG yields 3.01% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is KO or PG more profitable?
- KO runs the higher net margin — KO at 28.56% versus PG at 18.44%.
- How have KO and PG total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, KO delivered 11.00% and PG delivered 8.07% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Coca-Cola P/E ratioProcter & Gamble P/E ratioCoca-Cola dividend yieldProcter & Gamble dividend yieldCoca-Cola ROEProcter & Gamble ROECoca-Cola operating marginProcter & Gamble operating marginCoca-Cola revenue growthProcter & Gamble revenue growthCoca-Cola free cash flowProcter & Gamble free cash flow
Coca-Cola & Procter & Gamble appear in these rankings
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 10, 2026.