The Coca-Cola Company (KO) vs The Procter & Gamble Company (PG)
KO leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics, though PG is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of The Coca-Cola Company and The Procter & Gamble Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
$82.62Consumer Defensive
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
$149.61Consumer Defensive
Total return — KO vs PG
growth of $100 · last 30yKO +256.3%PG +575.4%PG compounded faster
KO PG
KO vs PG: by the numbers
- •KO is the larger company ($355.47B vs $348.38B market cap).
- •PG trades at the lower earnings multiple (21.87 vs 25.98 P/E).
- •KO converts more revenue to profit (27.80% vs 19.22% net margin).
- •KO grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.07% vs 2.98% CAGR).
- •PG pays the higher dividend yield (2.85% vs 1.88%).
Which is better, KO or PG?
Metric tally: KO 9 · PG 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValuePG(lower P/E)
GrowthKO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomePG(higher dividend yield)
QualityPG(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | KO | PG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 25.98 | 21.87● |
| Forward P/E | 23.70 | 21.17● |
| P/S ratio | 7.23 | 4.17● |
| P/B ratio | 10.60 | 6.63● |
| PEG ratio | 0.98● | 3.09 |
| EV / EBITDA | 20.26 | 16.61● |
| FCF yield | 3.52% | 4.16%● |
Profitability
| Metric | KO | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 61.74%● | 50.33% |
| Operating margin | 29.34%● | 23.24% |
| Net margin | 27.80%● | 19.22% |
| ROE | 40.74%● | 30.58% |
| ROIC | 13.00% | 16.47%● |
Dividends
| Metric | KO | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.88% | 2.85%● |
| Payout ratio | 50.82% | 63.85% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | KO | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 8.07%● | 2.98% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 11.12%● | 5.39% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 4.97%● | -1.64% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 11.29%● | 4.73% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, KO or PG?
- It depends on your goal. value: PG (lower P/E); growth: KO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: PG (higher dividend yield); quality: PG (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, KO leads 9 to 8.
- Is KO or PG cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, PG is cheaper: KO trades at a 25.98 P/E and PG at 21.87.
- Which has grown faster, KO or PG?
- Over the past five years, KO grew revenue faster — KO at a 8.07% CAGR versus PG at 2.98%.
- Does KO or PG pay a bigger dividend?
- KO yields 1.88% and PG yields 2.85% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is KO or PG more profitable?
- KO runs the higher net margin — KO at 27.80% versus PG at 19.22%.
- Which has been the better investment, KO or PG?
- Over the past 10-year, KO delivered the higher annualized total return — KO at 9.41% versus PG at 8.98%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Coca-Cola P/E ratioProcter & Gamble P/E ratioCoca-Cola dividend yieldProcter & Gamble dividend yieldCoca-Cola ROEProcter & Gamble ROECoca-Cola operating marginProcter & Gamble operating marginCoca-Cola revenue growthProcter & Gamble revenue growthCoca-Cola free cash flowProcter & Gamble free cash flow
Coca-Cola & Procter & Gamble appear in these rankings
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.