Which has the lower trailing P/E, PG or STZ?

STZ has the lower trailing P/E: PG trades at 21.94 and STZ at 11.68. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, PG or STZ?

Over the past five years, PG grew revenue faster — PG at a 2.72% CAGR versus STZ at 0.86%.

Does PG or STZ pay a bigger dividend?

PG yields 3.01% and STZ yields 3.37% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is PG or STZ more profitable?

STZ runs the higher net margin — PG at 18.44% versus STZ at 20.14%.

How have PG and STZ total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, PG delivered 8.07% and STZ delivered -1.27% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) vs Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ)

A side-by-side comparison of The Procter & Gamble Company and Constellation Brands, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

The Procter & Gamble Company

$345.34B

$145.27Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT

STZ

Constellation Brands, Inc.

$20.91B

$122.45Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — PG vs STZ

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

PG +112.8% (+7.8%/yr)STZ -13.2% (-1.4%/yr)PG compounded faster over this window

PG STZ

PG vs STZ: by the numbers

•PG is the larger company ($345.34B vs $20.91B market cap).
•STZ trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (11.68 vs 21.94 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•STZ converts more revenue to profit (20.14% vs 18.44% net margin).
•PG grew revenue faster over the past five years (2.72% vs 0.86% CAGR).
•STZ pays the higher dividend yield (3.37% vs 3.01%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	PG	STZ
P/E ratio	21.94	11.68
Forward P/E	20.82	10.38
P/S ratio	3.97	2.31
P/B ratio	6.36	2.53
EV / EBITDA	16.17	9.44
FCF yield	4.61%	8.77%

Profitability

Metric	PG	STZ
Gross margin	50.18%	52.62%
Operating margin	22.69%	32.14%
Net margin	18.44%	20.14%
ROE	29.54%	22.10%
ROIC	15.78%	10.85%

Dividends

Metric	PG	STZ
Dividend yield	3.01%	3.37%
Payout ratio	64.81%	39.12%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	PG	STZ
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	2.72%	0.86%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	3.48%	-1.59%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	0.42%	-1.73%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	2.41%	-9.18%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, PG or STZ?: STZ has the lower trailing P/E: PG trades at 21.94 and STZ at 11.68. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, PG or STZ?: Over the past five years, PG grew revenue faster — PG at a 2.72% CAGR versus STZ at 0.86%.
Does PG or STZ pay a bigger dividend?: PG yields 3.01% and STZ yields 3.37% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is PG or STZ more profitable?: STZ runs the higher net margin — PG at 18.44% versus STZ at 20.14%.
How have PG and STZ total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, PG delivered 8.07% and STZ delivered -1.27% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full PG analysis Full STZ analysis Interactive comparison tool

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 10, 2026.