Is PG or STZ cheaper?

On trailing earnings, STZ is cheaper: PG trades at a 21.87 P/E and STZ at 15.49.

Which has grown faster, PG or STZ?

Over the past five years, PG grew revenue faster — PG at a 2.98% CAGR versus STZ at 1.19%.

Does PG or STZ pay a bigger dividend?

PG yields 2.85% and STZ yields 2.75% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is PG or STZ more profitable?

PG runs the higher net margin — PG at 19.22% versus STZ at 18.46%.

Which has been the better investment, PG or STZ?

Over the past 10-year, PG delivered the higher annualized total return — PG at 8.98% versus STZ at 1.25%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) vs Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ)

STZ leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of The Procter & Gamble Company and Constellation Brands, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

The Procter & Gamble Company

$348.38B

$149.61Consumer Defensive

STZ

Constellation Brands, Inc.

$25.47B

$148.51Consumer Defensive

Not enough overlapping price history to compare PG and STZ.

PG vs STZ: by the numbers

•PG is the larger company ($348.38B vs $25.47B market cap).
•STZ trades at the lower earnings multiple (15.49 vs 21.87 P/E).
•PG converts more revenue to profit (19.22% vs 18.46% net margin).
•PG grew revenue faster over the past five years (2.98% vs 1.19% CAGR).
•PG pays the higher dividend yield (2.85% vs 2.75%).

Which is better, PG or STZ?

Metric tally: PG 7 · STZ 9

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueSTZ(lower P/E)

GrowthPG(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomePG(higher dividend yield)

QualityPG(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	PG	STZ
P/E ratio	21.87	15.49●
Forward P/E	21.17	11.90●
P/S ratio	4.17	2.82●
P/B ratio	6.63	3.19●
PEG ratio	3.09	—
EV / EBITDA	16.61	11.70●
FCF yield	4.16%	6.95%●

Profitability

Metric	PG	STZ
Gross margin	50.33%	51.67%●
Operating margin	23.24%	31.33%●
Net margin	19.22%●	18.46%
ROE	30.58%●	20.87%
ROIC	16.47%●	10.48%

Dividends

Metric	PG	STZ
Dividend yield	2.85%●	2.75%
Payout ratio	63.85%	42.52%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	PG	STZ
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	2.98%●	1.19%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	5.39%●	-1.59%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-1.64%	-1.57%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	4.73%●	-7.36%

Frequently asked

Which is better, PG or STZ?: It depends on your goal. value: STZ (lower P/E); growth: PG (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: PG (higher dividend yield); quality: PG (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, STZ leads 9 to 7.
Is PG or STZ cheaper?: On trailing earnings, STZ is cheaper: PG trades at a 21.87 P/E and STZ at 15.49.
Which has grown faster, PG or STZ?: Over the past five years, PG grew revenue faster — PG at a 2.98% CAGR versus STZ at 1.19%.
Does PG or STZ pay a bigger dividend?: PG yields 2.85% and STZ yields 2.75% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is PG or STZ more profitable?: PG runs the higher net margin — PG at 19.22% versus STZ at 18.46%.
Which has been the better investment, PG or STZ?: Over the past 10-year, PG delivered the higher annualized total return — PG at 8.98% versus STZ at 1.25%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full PG analysis Full STZ analysis Interactive comparison tool

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.