Is CL or STZ cheaper?

On trailing earnings, STZ is cheaper: CL trades at a 34.75 P/E and STZ at 15.49.

Which has grown faster, CL or STZ?

Over the past five years, CL grew revenue faster — CL at a 4.46% CAGR versus STZ at 1.19%.

Does CL or STZ pay a bigger dividend?

CL yields 2.34% and STZ yields 2.75% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CL or STZ more profitable?

STZ runs the higher net margin — CL at 10.04% versus STZ at 18.46%.

Which has been the better investment, CL or STZ?

Over the past 10-year, CL delivered the higher annualized total return — CL at 4.61% versus STZ at 1.25%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) vs Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ)

STZ leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Colgate-Palmolive Company and Constellation Brands, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Colgate-Palmolive Company

$71.58B

$89.45Consumer Defensive

STZ

Constellation Brands, Inc.

$25.47B

$148.51Consumer Defensive

Total return — CL vs STZ

growth of $100 · last 30y

CL +777.0%STZ +3669.3%STZ compounded faster

CL STZ

CL vs STZ: by the numbers

•CL is the larger company ($71.58B vs $25.47B market cap).
•STZ trades at the lower earnings multiple (15.49 vs 34.75 P/E).
•STZ converts more revenue to profit (18.46% vs 10.04% net margin).
•CL grew revenue faster over the past five years (4.46% vs 1.19% CAGR).
•STZ pays the higher dividend yield (2.75% vs 2.34%).

Which is better, CL or STZ?

Metric tally: CL 6 · STZ 10

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueSTZ(lower P/E)

GrowthCL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeSTZ(higher dividend yield)

QualityCL(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	CL	STZ
P/E ratio	34.75	15.49●
Forward P/E	22.22	11.90●
P/S ratio	3.46	2.82●
P/B ratio	496.66	3.19●
EV / EBITDA	21.17	11.70●
FCF yield	5.23%	6.95%●

Profitability

Metric	CL	STZ
Gross margin	60.06%●	51.67%
Operating margin	21.21%	31.33%●
Net margin	10.04%	18.46%●
ROE	1439.31%●	20.87%
ROIC	30.34%●	10.48%

Dividends

Metric	CL	STZ
Dividend yield	2.34%	2.75%●
Payout ratio	79.17%	42.52%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CL	STZ
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	4.46%●	1.19%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-3.47%	-1.59%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	3.88%●	-1.57%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	3.78%●	-7.36%

Frequently asked

Which is better, CL or STZ?: It depends on your goal. value: STZ (lower P/E); growth: CL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: STZ (higher dividend yield); quality: CL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, STZ leads 10 to 6.
Is CL or STZ cheaper?: On trailing earnings, STZ is cheaper: CL trades at a 34.75 P/E and STZ at 15.49.
Which has grown faster, CL or STZ?: Over the past five years, CL grew revenue faster — CL at a 4.46% CAGR versus STZ at 1.19%.
Does CL or STZ pay a bigger dividend?: CL yields 2.34% and STZ yields 2.75% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CL or STZ more profitable?: STZ runs the higher net margin — CL at 10.04% versus STZ at 18.46%.
Which has been the better investment, CL or STZ?: Over the past 10-year, CL delivered the higher annualized total return — CL at 4.61% versus STZ at 1.25%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CL analysis Full STZ analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Colgate-Palmolive P/E ratio Constellation Brands P/E ratio Colgate-Palmolive dividend yield Constellation Brands dividend yield Colgate-Palmolive ROE Constellation Brands ROE Colgate-Palmolive operating margin Constellation Brands operating margin Colgate-Palmolive revenue growth Constellation Brands revenue growth Colgate-Palmolive free cash flow Constellation Brands free cash flow

Colgate-Palmolive & Constellation Brands appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Dividend Aristocrats Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.