Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) vs Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ)
A side-by-side comparison of Colgate-Palmolive Company and Constellation Brands, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
CL
Colgate-Palmolive Company
$86.80Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
$122.45Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CL vs STZ
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCL +53.3% (+4.4%/yr)STZ -13.2% (-1.4%/yr)CL compounded faster over this window
CL STZ
CL vs STZ: by the numbers
- •CL is the larger company ($69.46B vs $20.91B market cap).
- •STZ trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (11.68 vs 34.39 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •STZ converts more revenue to profit (20.14% vs 9.68% net margin).
- •CL grew revenue faster over the past five years (4.26% vs 0.86% CAGR).
- •STZ pays the higher dividend yield (3.37% vs 2.39%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CL | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 34.39 | 11.68 |
| Forward P/E | 22.44 | 10.38 |
| P/S ratio | 3.30 | 2.31 |
| P/B ratio | 294.31 | 2.53 |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.23 | 9.44 |
| FCF yield | 5.55% | 8.77% |
Profitability
| Metric | CL | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 60.42% | 52.62% |
| Operating margin | 20.65% | 32.14% |
| Net margin | 9.68% | 20.14% |
| ROE | 863.14% | 22.10% |
| ROIC | 29.91% | 10.85% |
Dividends
| Metric | CL | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.39% | 3.37% |
| Payout ratio | 83.20% | 39.12% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CL | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 4.26% | 0.86% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -3.47% | -1.59% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 7.70% | -1.73% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 5.14% | -9.18% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CL or STZ?
- STZ has the lower trailing P/E: CL trades at 34.39 and STZ at 11.68. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CL or STZ?
- Over the past five years, CL grew revenue faster — CL at a 4.26% CAGR versus STZ at 0.86%.
- Does CL or STZ pay a bigger dividend?
- CL yields 2.39% and STZ yields 3.37% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CL or STZ more profitable?
- STZ runs the higher net margin — CL at 9.68% versus STZ at 20.14%.
- How have CL and STZ total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CL delivered 4.62% and STZ delivered -1.27% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Colgate-Palmolive P/E ratioConstellation Brands P/E ratioColgate-Palmolive dividend yieldConstellation Brands dividend yieldColgate-Palmolive ROEConstellation Brands ROEColgate-Palmolive operating marginConstellation Brands operating marginColgate-Palmolive revenue growthConstellation Brands revenue growthColgate-Palmolive free cash flowConstellation Brands free cash flow
Colgate-Palmolive & Constellation Brands appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.