Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) vs The Procter & Gamble Company (PG)
KMB leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Kimberly-Clark Corporation and The Procter & Gamble Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
$102.29Consumer Defensive
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
$149.61Consumer Defensive
Total return — KMB vs PG
growth of $100 · last 30yKMB +196.9%PG +575.4%PG compounded faster
KMB PG
KMB vs PG: by the numbers
- •PG is the larger company ($348.38B vs $33.95B market cap).
- •KMB trades at the lower earnings multiple (16.06 vs 21.87 P/E).
- •PG converts more revenue to profit (19.22% vs 12.81% net margin).
- •PG grew revenue faster over the past five years (2.98% vs -2.61% CAGR).
- •KMB pays the higher dividend yield (4.97% vs 2.85%).
Which is better, KMB or PG?
Metric tally: KMB 9 · PG 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueKMB(lower P/E)
GrowthPG(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeKMB(higher dividend yield)
QualityKMB(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | KMB | PG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 16.06● | 21.87 |
| Forward P/E | 13.49● | 21.17 |
| P/S ratio | 2.06● | 4.17 |
| P/B ratio | 18.98 | 6.63● |
| PEG ratio | — | 3.09 |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.26● | 16.61 |
| FCF yield | 7.56%● | 4.16% |
Profitability
| Metric | KMB | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 35.86% | 50.33%● |
| Operating margin | 13.27% | 23.24%● |
| Net margin | 12.81% | 19.22%● |
| ROE | 117.98%● | 30.58% |
| ROIC | 17.62%● | 16.47% |
Dividends
| Metric | KMB | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 4.97%● | 2.85% |
| Payout ratio | 83.55% | 63.85% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | KMB | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -2.61% | 2.98%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -2.50% | 5.39%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 3.38%● | -1.64% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -0.94% | 4.73%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, KMB or PG?
- It depends on your goal. value: KMB (lower P/E); growth: PG (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: KMB (higher dividend yield); quality: KMB (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, KMB leads 9 to 7.
- Is KMB or PG cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, KMB is cheaper: KMB trades at a 16.06 P/E and PG at 21.87.
- Which has grown faster, KMB or PG?
- Over the past five years, PG grew revenue faster — KMB at a -2.61% CAGR versus PG at 2.98%.
- Does KMB or PG pay a bigger dividend?
- KMB yields 4.97% and PG yields 2.85% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is KMB or PG more profitable?
- PG runs the higher net margin — KMB at 12.81% versus PG at 19.22%.
- Which has been the better investment, KMB or PG?
- Over the past 10-year, PG delivered the higher annualized total return — KMB at 1.05% versus PG at 8.98%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Kimberly-Clark P/E ratioProcter & Gamble P/E ratioKimberly-Clark dividend yieldProcter & Gamble dividend yieldKimberly-Clark ROEProcter & Gamble ROEKimberly-Clark operating marginProcter & Gamble operating marginKimberly-Clark revenue growthProcter & Gamble revenue growthKimberly-Clark free cash flowProcter & Gamble free cash flow
Kimberly-Clark & Procter & Gamble appear in these rankings
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.