Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) vs The Procter & Gamble Company (PG)
A side-by-side comparison of Kimberly-Clark Corporation and The Procter & Gamble Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
$98.15Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
$145.27Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT
Total return — KMB vs PG
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yKMB +25.0% (+2.3%/yr)PG +112.8% (+7.8%/yr)PG compounded faster over this window
KMB PG
KMB vs PG: by the numbers
- •PG is the larger company ($345.34B vs $32.58B market cap).
- •KMB trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (16.69 vs 21.94 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •PG converts more revenue to profit (18.44% vs 11.80% net margin).
- •PG grew revenue faster over the past five years (2.72% vs -2.69% CAGR).
- •KMB pays the higher dividend yield (5.18% vs 3.01%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | KMB | PG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 16.69 | 21.94 |
| Forward P/E | 13.18 | 20.82 |
| P/S ratio | 1.97 | 3.97 |
| P/B ratio | 18.62 | 6.36 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.44 | 16.17 |
| FCF yield | 5.40% | 4.61% |
Profitability
| Metric | KMB | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 36.69% | 50.18% |
| Operating margin | 12.38% | 22.69% |
| Net margin | 11.80% | 18.44% |
| ROE | 111.71% | 29.54% |
| ROIC | 12.46% | 15.78% |
Dividends
| Metric | KMB | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 5.18% | 3.01% |
| Payout ratio | 86.73% | 64.81% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | KMB | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -2.69% | 2.72% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -2.50% | 3.48% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -8.19% | 0.42% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -2.69% | 2.41% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, KMB or PG?
- KMB has the lower trailing P/E: KMB trades at 16.69 and PG at 21.94. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, KMB or PG?
- Over the past five years, PG grew revenue faster — KMB at a -2.69% CAGR versus PG at 2.72%.
- Does KMB or PG pay a bigger dividend?
- KMB yields 5.18% and PG yields 3.01% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is KMB or PG more profitable?
- PG runs the higher net margin — KMB at 11.80% versus PG at 18.44%.
- How have KMB and PG total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, KMB delivered 1.35% and PG delivered 8.07% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Kimberly-Clark P/E ratioProcter & Gamble P/E ratioKimberly-Clark dividend yieldProcter & Gamble dividend yieldKimberly-Clark ROEProcter & Gamble ROEKimberly-Clark operating marginProcter & Gamble operating marginKimberly-Clark revenue growthProcter & Gamble revenue growthKimberly-Clark free cash flowProcter & Gamble free cash flow
Kimberly-Clark & Procter & Gamble appear in these rankings
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.