Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) vs The Procter & Gamble Company (PG)
A side-by-side comparison of Kimberly-Clark Corporation and The Procter & Gamble Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
$113.09Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
$148.75Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — KMB vs PG
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30yKMB +678.6%PG +1365.9%PG compounded faster
KMB PG
KMB vs PG: by the numbers
- •PG is the larger company ($346.38B vs $37.54B market cap).
- •KMB trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (17.49 vs 21.73 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •PG converts more revenue to profit (19.22% vs 12.81% net margin).
- •PG grew revenue faster over the past five years (2.98% vs -2.61% CAGR).
- •KMB pays the higher dividend yield (4.56% vs 2.87%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | KMB | PG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 17.49 | 21.73 |
| Forward P/E | 14.81 | 21.62 |
| P/S ratio | 2.25 | 4.14 |
| P/B ratio | 20.67 | 6.59 |
| PEG ratio | N/A | 3.01 |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.38 | 16.53 |
| FCF yield | 6.94% | 4.18% |
Profitability
| Metric | KMB | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 35.86% | 50.33% |
| Operating margin | 13.27% | 23.24% |
| Net margin | 12.81% | 19.22% |
| ROE | 117.98% | 30.58% |
| ROIC | 17.41% | 16.47% |
Dividends
| Metric | KMB | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 4.56% | 2.87% |
| Payout ratio | 83.55% | 63.85% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | KMB | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -2.61% | 2.98% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -2.50% | 5.39% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -8.19% | -1.64% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 0.34% | 3.71% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, KMB or PG?
- KMB has the lower trailing P/E: KMB trades at 17.49 and PG at 21.73. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, KMB or PG?
- Over the past five years, PG grew revenue faster — KMB at a -2.61% CAGR versus PG at 2.98%.
- Does KMB or PG pay a bigger dividend?
- KMB yields 4.56% and PG yields 2.87% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is KMB or PG more profitable?
- PG runs the higher net margin — KMB at 12.81% versus PG at 19.22%.
- How have KMB and PG total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, KMB delivered 2.16% and PG delivered 8.74% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Kimberly-Clark P/E ratioProcter & Gamble P/E ratioKimberly-Clark dividend yieldProcter & Gamble dividend yieldKimberly-Clark ROEProcter & Gamble ROEKimberly-Clark operating marginProcter & Gamble operating marginKimberly-Clark revenue growthProcter & Gamble revenue growthKimberly-Clark free cash flowProcter & Gamble free cash flow
Kimberly-Clark & Procter & Gamble appear in these rankings
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.