Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) vs PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP)
KMB leads on 8 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Kimberly-Clark Corporation and PepsiCo, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
$102.29Consumer Defensive
PEP
PepsiCo, Inc.
$144.27Consumer Defensive
Not enough overlapping price history to compare KMB and PEP.
KMB vs PEP: by the numbers
- •PEP is the larger company ($197.21B vs $33.95B market cap).
- •KMB trades at the lower earnings multiple (16.06 vs 22.65 P/E).
- •KMB converts more revenue to profit (12.81% vs 9.16% net margin).
- •PEP grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.00% vs -2.61% CAGR).
- •KMB pays the higher dividend yield (4.97% vs 3.98%).
Which is better, KMB or PEP?
Metric tally: KMB 8 · PEP 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueKMB(lower P/E)
GrowthPEP(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeKMB(higher dividend yield)
QualityKMB(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | KMB | PEP |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 16.06● | 22.65 |
| Forward P/E | 13.49● | 15.81 |
| P/S ratio | 2.06 | 2.07 |
| P/B ratio | 18.98 | 9.25● |
| PEG ratio | — | 9.44 |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.26● | 15.92 |
| FCF yield | 7.56%● | 4.47% |
Profitability
| Metric | KMB | PEP |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 35.86% | 54.06%● |
| Operating margin | 13.27% | 14.79%● |
| Net margin | 12.81%● | 9.16% |
| ROE | 117.98%● | 40.89% |
| ROIC | 17.62%● | 13.29% |
Dividends
| Metric | KMB | PEP |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 4.97%● | 3.98% |
| Payout ratio | 83.55% | 95.32% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | KMB | PEP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -2.61% | 6.00%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -2.50% | 2.40%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 3.38% | 6.62%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -0.94% | 2.72%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, KMB or PEP?
- It depends on your goal. value: KMB (lower P/E); growth: PEP (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: KMB (higher dividend yield); quality: KMB (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, KMB leads 8 to 7.
- Is KMB or PEP cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, KMB is cheaper: KMB trades at a 16.06 P/E and PEP at 22.65.
- Which has grown faster, KMB or PEP?
- Over the past five years, PEP grew revenue faster — KMB at a -2.61% CAGR versus PEP at 6.00%.
- Does KMB or PEP pay a bigger dividend?
- KMB yields 4.97% and PEP yields 3.98% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is KMB or PEP more profitable?
- KMB runs the higher net margin — KMB at 12.81% versus PEP at 9.16%.
- Which has been the better investment, KMB or PEP?
- Over the past 10-year, PEP delivered the higher annualized total return — KMB at 1.05% versus PEP at 6.61%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Kimberly-Clark P/E ratioPepsiCo P/E ratioKimberly-Clark dividend yieldPepsiCo dividend yieldKimberly-Clark ROEPepsiCo ROEKimberly-Clark operating marginPepsiCo operating marginKimberly-Clark revenue growthPepsiCo revenue growthKimberly-Clark free cash flowPepsiCo free cash flow
Kimberly-Clark & PepsiCo appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.