Which has the lower trailing P/E, KMB or PEP?

KMB has the lower trailing P/E: KMB trades at 16.69 and PEP at 17.87. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, KMB or PEP?

Over the past five years, PEP grew revenue faster — KMB at a -2.69% CAGR versus PEP at 5.37%.

Does KMB or PEP pay a bigger dividend?

KMB yields 5.18% and PEP yields 4.25% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is KMB or PEP more profitable?

KMB runs the higher net margin — KMB at 11.80% versus PEP at 10.82%.

How have KMB and PEP total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, KMB delivered 1.35% and PEP delivered 6.00% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) vs PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP)

A side-by-side comparison of Kimberly-Clark Corporation and PepsiCo, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

KMB

Kimberly-Clark Corporation

$32.58B

$98.15Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

PEP

PepsiCo, Inc.

$186.21B

$136.32Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — KMB vs PEP

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

KMB +18.7% (+1.7%/yr)PEP +78.1% (+5.9%/yr)PEP compounded faster over this window

KMB PEP

KMB vs PEP: by the numbers

•PEP is the larger company ($186.21B vs $32.58B market cap).
•KMB trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (16.69 vs 17.87 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•KMB converts more revenue to profit (11.80% vs 10.82% net margin).
•PEP grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.37% vs -2.69% CAGR).
•KMB pays the higher dividend yield (5.18% vs 4.25%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	KMB	PEP
P/E ratio	16.69	17.87
Forward P/E	13.18	15.94
P/S ratio	1.97	1.92
P/B ratio	18.62	8.43
EV / EBITDA	14.44	12.16
FCF yield	5.40%	4.98%

Profitability

Metric	KMB	PEP
Gross margin	36.69%	53.96%
Operating margin	12.38%	14.96%
Net margin	11.80%	10.82%
ROE	111.71%	47.45%
ROIC	12.46%	13.22%

Dividends

Metric	KMB	PEP
Dividend yield	5.18%	4.25%
Payout ratio	86.73%	76.08%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	KMB	PEP
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-2.69%	5.37%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-2.50%	3.25%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-8.19%	5.40%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-2.69%	0.63%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, KMB or PEP?: KMB has the lower trailing P/E: KMB trades at 16.69 and PEP at 17.87. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, KMB or PEP?: Over the past five years, PEP grew revenue faster — KMB at a -2.69% CAGR versus PEP at 5.37%.
Does KMB or PEP pay a bigger dividend?: KMB yields 5.18% and PEP yields 4.25% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is KMB or PEP more profitable?: KMB runs the higher net margin — KMB at 11.80% versus PEP at 10.82%.
How have KMB and PEP total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, KMB delivered 1.35% and PEP delivered 6.00% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full KMB analysis Full PEP analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Kimberly-Clark P/E ratio PepsiCo P/E ratio Kimberly-Clark dividend yield PepsiCo dividend yield Kimberly-Clark ROE PepsiCo ROE Kimberly-Clark operating margin PepsiCo operating margin Kimberly-Clark revenue growth PepsiCo revenue growth Kimberly-Clark free cash flow PepsiCo free cash flow

Kimberly-Clark & PepsiCo appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks 25+ Year Dividend Growers Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.