Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) vs The Coca-Cola Company (KO)
A side-by-side comparison of Kimberly-Clark Corporation and The Coca-Cola Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
$98.15Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
$88.29Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — KMB vs KO
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yKMB +15.5% (+1.4%/yr)KO +175.1% (+10.6%/yr)KO compounded faster over this window
KMB KO
KMB vs KO: by the numbers
- •KO is the larger company ($379.87B vs $32.58B market cap).
- •KMB trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (16.69 vs 26.51 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •KO converts more revenue to profit (28.56% vs 11.80% net margin).
- •KO grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.60% vs -2.69% CAGR).
- •KMB pays the higher dividend yield (5.18% vs 2.37%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | KMB | KO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 16.69 | 26.51 |
| Forward P/E | 13.18 | 26.71 |
| P/S ratio | 1.97 | 7.58 |
| P/B ratio | 18.62 | 10.51 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.44 | 25.84 |
| FCF yield | 5.40% | 3.76% |
Profitability
| Metric | KMB | KO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 36.69% | 61.89% |
| Operating margin | 12.38% | 29.63% |
| Net margin | 11.80% | 28.56% |
| ROE | 111.71% | 39.60% |
| ROIC | 12.46% | 13.91% |
Dividends
| Metric | KMB | KO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 5.18% | 2.37% |
| Payout ratio | 86.73% | 62.46% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | KMB | KO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -2.69% | 6.60% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -2.50% | 11.12% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -8.19% | -9.38% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -2.69% | 12.87% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, KMB or KO?
- KMB has the lower trailing P/E: KMB trades at 16.69 and KO at 26.51. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, KMB or KO?
- Over the past five years, KO grew revenue faster — KMB at a -2.69% CAGR versus KO at 6.60%.
- Does KMB or KO pay a bigger dividend?
- KMB yields 5.18% and KO yields 2.37% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is KMB or KO more profitable?
- KO runs the higher net margin — KMB at 11.80% versus KO at 28.56%.
- How have KMB and KO total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, KMB delivered 1.35% and KO delivered 11.00% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Kimberly-Clark P/E ratioCoca-Cola P/E ratioKimberly-Clark dividend yieldCoca-Cola dividend yieldKimberly-Clark ROECoca-Cola ROEKimberly-Clark operating marginCoca-Cola operating marginKimberly-Clark revenue growthCoca-Cola revenue growthKimberly-Clark free cash flowCoca-Cola free cash flow
Kimberly-Clark & Coca-Cola appear in these rankings
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.