Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) vs The Coca-Cola Company (KO)
KMB and KO are evenly matched — 8 metrics each of 16.
A side-by-side comparison of Kimberly-Clark Corporation and The Coca-Cola Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
$102.29Consumer Defensive
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
$82.62Consumer Defensive
Not enough overlapping price history to compare KMB and KO.
KMB vs KO: by the numbers
- •KO is the larger company ($355.47B vs $33.95B market cap).
- •KMB trades at the lower earnings multiple (16.06 vs 25.98 P/E).
- •KO converts more revenue to profit (27.80% vs 12.81% net margin).
- •KO grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.07% vs -2.61% CAGR).
- •KMB pays the higher dividend yield (4.97% vs 1.88%).
Which is better, KMB or KO?
Metric tally: KMB 8 · KO 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueKMB(lower P/E)
GrowthKO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeKMB(higher dividend yield)
QualityKMB(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | KMB | KO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 16.06● | 25.98 |
| Forward P/E | 13.49● | 23.70 |
| P/S ratio | 2.06● | 7.23 |
| P/B ratio | 18.98 | 10.60● |
| PEG ratio | — | 0.98 |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.26● | 20.26 |
| FCF yield | 7.56%● | 3.52% |
Profitability
| Metric | KMB | KO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 35.86% | 61.74%● |
| Operating margin | 13.27% | 29.34%● |
| Net margin | 12.81% | 27.80%● |
| ROE | 117.98%● | 40.74% |
| ROIC | 17.62%● | 13.00% |
Dividends
| Metric | KMB | KO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 4.97%● | 1.88% |
| Payout ratio | 83.55% | 50.82% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | KMB | KO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -2.61% | 8.07%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -2.50% | 11.12%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 3.38% | 4.97%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -0.94% | 11.29%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, KMB or KO?
- It depends on your goal. value: KMB (lower P/E); growth: KO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: KMB (higher dividend yield); quality: KMB (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
- Is KMB or KO cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, KMB is cheaper: KMB trades at a 16.06 P/E and KO at 25.98.
- Which has grown faster, KMB or KO?
- Over the past five years, KO grew revenue faster — KMB at a -2.61% CAGR versus KO at 8.07%.
- Does KMB or KO pay a bigger dividend?
- KMB yields 4.97% and KO yields 1.88% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is KMB or KO more profitable?
- KO runs the higher net margin — KMB at 12.81% versus KO at 27.80%.
- Which has been the better investment, KMB or KO?
- Over the past 10-year, KO delivered the higher annualized total return — KMB at 1.05% versus KO at 9.41%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Kimberly-Clark P/E ratioCoca-Cola P/E ratioKimberly-Clark dividend yieldCoca-Cola dividend yieldKimberly-Clark ROECoca-Cola ROEKimberly-Clark operating marginCoca-Cola operating marginKimberly-Clark revenue growthCoca-Cola revenue growthKimberly-Clark free cash flowCoca-Cola free cash flow
Kimberly-Clark & Coca-Cola appear in these rankings
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.