Which has the lower trailing P/E, KMB or MNST?

KMB has the lower trailing P/E: KMB trades at 16.69 and MNST at 40.00. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, KMB or MNST?

Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — KMB at a -2.69% CAGR versus MNST at 12.36%.

Does KMB or MNST pay a bigger dividend?

KMB pays a dividend (5.18% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is KMB or MNST more profitable?

MNST runs the higher net margin — KMB at 11.80% versus MNST at 23.08%.

How have KMB and MNST total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, KMB delivered 1.35% and MNST delivered 13.35% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) vs Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST)

A side-by-side comparison of Kimberly-Clark Corporation and Monster Beverage Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

KMB

Kimberly-Clark Corporation

$32.58B

$98.15Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

MNST

Monster Beverage Corporation

$84.89B

$43.40Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — KMB vs MNST

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

KMB +15.5% (+1.4%/yr)MNST +253.2% (+13.4%/yr)MNST compounded faster over this window

KMB MNST

KMB vs MNST: by the numbers

•MNST is the larger company ($84.89B vs $32.58B market cap).
•KMB trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (16.69 vs 40.00 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•MNST converts more revenue to profit (23.08% vs 11.80% net margin).
•MNST grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.36% vs -2.69% CAGR).
•KMB pays a dividend (5.18% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	KMB	MNST
P/E ratio	16.69	40.00
Forward P/E	13.18	37.40
P/S ratio	1.97	9.21
P/B ratio	18.62	9.07
EV / EBITDA	14.44	28.61
FCF yield	5.40%	2.47%

Profitability

Metric	KMB	MNST
Gross margin	36.69%	55.55%
Operating margin	12.38%	29.16%
Net margin	11.80%	23.08%
ROE	111.71%	22.72%
ROIC	12.46%	21.32%

Dividends

Metric	KMB	MNST
Dividend yield	5.18%	N/A
Payout ratio	86.73%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	KMB	MNST
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-2.69%	12.36%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-2.50%	7.95%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-8.19%	7.93%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-2.69%	12.44%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, KMB or MNST?: KMB has the lower trailing P/E: KMB trades at 16.69 and MNST at 40.00. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, KMB or MNST?: Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — KMB at a -2.69% CAGR versus MNST at 12.36%.
Does KMB or MNST pay a bigger dividend?: KMB pays a dividend (5.18% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is KMB or MNST more profitable?: MNST runs the higher net margin — KMB at 11.80% versus MNST at 23.08%.
How have KMB and MNST total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, KMB delivered 1.35% and MNST delivered 13.35% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full KMB analysis Full MNST analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Kimberly-Clark P/E ratio Monster Beverage P/E ratio Kimberly-Clark dividend yield Kimberly-Clark ROE Monster Beverage ROE Kimberly-Clark operating margin Monster Beverage operating margin Kimberly-Clark revenue growth Monster Beverage revenue growth Kimberly-Clark free cash flow Monster Beverage free cash flow

Kimberly-Clark & Monster Beverage appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks 25+ Year Dividend Growers Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.