Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) vs Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST)
MNST leads on 9 of 15 compared metrics, though KMB is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Kimberly-Clark Corporation and Monster Beverage Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
$102.29Consumer Defensive
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
$92.83Consumer Defensive
Not enough overlapping price history to compare KMB and MNST.
KMB vs MNST: by the numbers
- •MNST is the larger company ($90.79B vs $33.95B market cap).
- •KMB trades at the lower earnings multiple (16.06 vs 44.85 P/E).
- •MNST converts more revenue to profit (23.11% vs 12.81% net margin).
- •MNST grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.96% vs -2.61% CAGR).
- •KMB pays a dividend (4.97% yield) while MNST does not currently pay one.
Which is better, KMB or MNST?
Metric tally: KMB 6 · MNST 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueKMB(lower P/E)
GrowthMNST(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityMNST(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | KMB | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 16.06● | 44.85 |
| Forward P/E | 13.49● | 35.95 |
| P/S ratio | 2.06● | 10.43 |
| P/B ratio | 18.98 | 10.51● |
| PEG ratio | — | 1.31 |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.26● | 32.31 |
| FCF yield | 7.56%● | 2.26% |
Profitability
| Metric | KMB | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 35.86% | 55.47%● |
| Operating margin | 13.27% | 29.34%● |
| Net margin | 12.81% | 23.11%● |
| ROE | 117.98%● | 23.28% |
| ROIC | 17.62% | 21.74%● |
Dividends
| Metric | KMB | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 4.97% | — |
| Payout ratio | 83.55% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | KMB | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -2.61% | 12.96%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -2.50% | 7.95%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 3.38% | 10.53%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -0.94% | 14.70%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, KMB or MNST?
- It depends on your goal. value: KMB (lower P/E); growth: MNST (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: MNST (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MNST leads 9 to 6.
- Is KMB or MNST cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, KMB is cheaper: KMB trades at a 16.06 P/E and MNST at 44.85.
- Which has grown faster, KMB or MNST?
- Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — KMB at a -2.61% CAGR versus MNST at 12.96%.
- Does KMB or MNST pay a bigger dividend?
- KMB pays a dividend (4.97% yield) while MNST does not currently pay one.
- Is KMB or MNST more profitable?
- MNST runs the higher net margin — KMB at 12.81% versus MNST at 23.11%.
- Which has been the better investment, KMB or MNST?
- Over the past 10-year, MNST delivered the higher annualized total return — KMB at 1.05% versus MNST at 13.75%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Kimberly-Clark P/E ratioMonster Beverage P/E ratioKimberly-Clark dividend yieldMonster Beverage dividend yieldKimberly-Clark ROEMonster Beverage ROEKimberly-Clark operating marginMonster Beverage operating marginKimberly-Clark revenue growthMonster Beverage revenue growthKimberly-Clark free cash flowMonster Beverage free cash flow
Kimberly-Clark & Monster Beverage appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.