The Coca-Cola Company (KO) vs Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST)
KO leads on 10 of 14 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of The Coca-Cola Company and Monster Beverage Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
$82.62Consumer Defensive
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
$92.83Consumer Defensive
Total return — KO vs MNST
growth of $100 · last 30yKO +256.3%MNST +509143.5%MNST compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
KO MNST
KO vs MNST: by the numbers
- •KO is the larger company ($355.47B vs $90.79B market cap).
- •KO trades at the lower earnings multiple (25.98 vs 44.85 P/E).
- •KO converts more revenue to profit (27.80% vs 23.11% net margin).
- •MNST grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.96% vs 8.07% CAGR).
- •KO pays a dividend (1.88% yield) while MNST does not currently pay one.
Which is better, KO or MNST?
Metric tally: KO 10 · MNST 4It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueKO(lower P/E)
GrowthMNST(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityMNST(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | KO | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 25.98● | 44.85 |
| Forward P/E | 23.70● | 35.95 |
| P/S ratio | 7.23● | 10.43 |
| P/B ratio | 10.60 | 10.51 |
| PEG ratio | 0.98● | 1.31 |
| EV / EBITDA | 20.26● | 32.31 |
| FCF yield | 3.52%● | 2.26% |
Profitability
| Metric | KO | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 61.74%● | 55.47% |
| Operating margin | 29.34% | 29.34% |
| Net margin | 27.80%● | 23.11% |
| ROE | 40.74%● | 23.28% |
| ROIC | 13.00% | 21.74%● |
Dividends
| Metric | KO | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.88% | — |
| Payout ratio | 50.82% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | KO | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 8.07% | 12.96%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 11.12%● | 7.95% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 4.97% | 10.53%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 11.29% | 14.70%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, KO or MNST?
- It depends on your goal. value: KO (lower P/E); growth: MNST (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: MNST (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, KO leads 10 to 4.
- Is KO or MNST cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, KO is cheaper: KO trades at a 25.98 P/E and MNST at 44.85.
- Which has grown faster, KO or MNST?
- Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — KO at a 8.07% CAGR versus MNST at 12.96%.
- Does KO or MNST pay a bigger dividend?
- KO pays a dividend (1.88% yield) while MNST does not currently pay one.
- Is KO or MNST more profitable?
- KO runs the higher net margin — KO at 27.80% versus MNST at 23.11%.
- Which has been the better investment, KO or MNST?
- Over the past 10-year, MNST delivered the higher annualized total return — KO at 9.41% versus MNST at 13.75%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Coca-Cola P/E ratioMonster Beverage P/E ratioCoca-Cola dividend yieldMonster Beverage dividend yieldCoca-Cola ROEMonster Beverage ROECoca-Cola operating marginMonster Beverage operating marginCoca-Cola revenue growthMonster Beverage revenue growthCoca-Cola free cash flowMonster Beverage free cash flow
Coca-Cola & Monster Beverage appear in these rankings
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.