Which has the lower trailing P/E, MNST or STZ?

STZ has the lower trailing P/E: MNST trades at 40.00 and STZ at 11.68. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, MNST or STZ?

Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — MNST at a 12.36% CAGR versus STZ at 0.86%.

Does MNST or STZ pay a bigger dividend?

STZ pays a dividend (3.37% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is MNST or STZ more profitable?

MNST runs the higher net margin — MNST at 23.08% versus STZ at 20.14%.

How have MNST and STZ total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, MNST delivered 13.35% and STZ delivered -1.27% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) vs Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ)

A side-by-side comparison of Monster Beverage Corporation and Constellation Brands, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

MNST

Monster Beverage Corporation

$84.89B

$43.40Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

STZ

Constellation Brands, Inc.

$20.91B

$122.45Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — MNST vs STZ

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

MNST +261.3% (+13.7%/yr)STZ -13.2% (-1.4%/yr)MNST compounded faster over this window

MNST STZ

MNST vs STZ: by the numbers

•MNST is the larger company ($84.89B vs $20.91B market cap).
•STZ trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (11.68 vs 40.00 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•MNST converts more revenue to profit (23.08% vs 20.14% net margin).
•MNST grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.36% vs 0.86% CAGR).
•STZ pays a dividend (3.37% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MNST	STZ
P/E ratio	40.00	11.68
Forward P/E	37.40	10.38
P/S ratio	9.21	2.31
P/B ratio	9.07	2.53
EV / EBITDA	28.61	9.44
FCF yield	2.47%	8.77%

Profitability

Metric	MNST	STZ
Gross margin	55.55%	52.62%
Operating margin	29.16%	32.14%
Net margin	23.08%	20.14%
ROE	22.72%	22.10%
ROIC	21.32%	10.85%

Dividends

Metric	MNST	STZ
Dividend yield	N/A	3.37%
Payout ratio	N/A	39.12%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MNST	STZ
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	12.36%	0.86%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	7.95%	-1.59%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	7.93%	-1.73%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	12.44%	-9.18%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, MNST or STZ?: STZ has the lower trailing P/E: MNST trades at 40.00 and STZ at 11.68. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, MNST or STZ?: Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — MNST at a 12.36% CAGR versus STZ at 0.86%.
Does MNST or STZ pay a bigger dividend?: STZ pays a dividend (3.37% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is MNST or STZ more profitable?: MNST runs the higher net margin — MNST at 23.08% versus STZ at 20.14%.
How have MNST and STZ total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, MNST delivered 13.35% and STZ delivered -1.27% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MNST analysis Full STZ analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Monster Beverage P/E ratio Constellation Brands P/E ratio Constellation Brands dividend yield Monster Beverage ROE Constellation Brands ROE Monster Beverage operating margin Constellation Brands operating margin Monster Beverage revenue growth Constellation Brands revenue growth Monster Beverage free cash flow Constellation Brands free cash flow

Monster Beverage & Constellation Brands appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.