Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) vs Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST)
BUD leads on 9 of 14 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV and Monster Beverage Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 16, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
BUD
Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV
$81.48Consumer Defensive
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
$93.23Consumer Defensive
Total return — BUD vs MNST
growth of $100 · last 17yBUD +114.2%MNST +3471.9%MNST compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
BUD MNST
BUD vs MNST: by the numbers
- •BUD is the larger company ($159.72B vs $90.81B market cap).
- •BUD trades at the lower earnings multiple (13.34 vs 45.04 P/E).
- •MNST converts more revenue to profit (23.11% vs 10.14% net margin).
- •MNST grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.96% vs 3.94% CAGR).
- •BUD pays a dividend (1.65% yield) while MNST does not currently pay one.
Which is better, BUD or MNST?
Metric tally: BUD 9 · MNST 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueBUD(lower P/E)
GrowthMNST(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityMNST(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BUD | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 13.34● | 45.04 |
| Forward P/E | 16.80● | 36.10 |
| P/S ratio | 1.34● | 10.48 |
| P/B ratio | 1.85● | 10.56 |
| PEG ratio | 1.00● | 1.31 |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.47● | 32.46 |
| FCF yield | 13.89%● | 2.25% |
Profitability
| Metric | BUD | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 55.67% | 55.47% |
| Operating margin | 31.82%● | 29.34% |
| Net margin | 10.14% | 23.11%● |
| ROE | 13.99% | 23.28%● |
| ROIC | 6.32% | 21.74%● |
Dividends
| Metric | BUD | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.65% | — |
| Payout ratio | 38.95% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BUD | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 3.94% | 12.96%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 37.66%● | 7.95% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 10.48% | 10.53% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 2.42% | 15.21%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, BUD or MNST?
- It depends on your goal. value: BUD (lower P/E); growth: MNST (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: MNST (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, BUD leads 9 to 5.
- Is BUD or MNST cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, BUD is cheaper: BUD trades at a 13.34 P/E and MNST at 45.04.
- Which has grown faster, BUD or MNST?
- Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — BUD at a 3.94% CAGR versus MNST at 12.96%.
- Does BUD or MNST pay a bigger dividend?
- BUD pays a dividend (1.65% yield) while MNST does not currently pay one.
- Is BUD or MNST more profitable?
- MNST runs the higher net margin — BUD at 10.14% versus MNST at 23.11%.
- Which has been the better investment, BUD or MNST?
- Over the past 10-year, MNST delivered the higher annualized total return — BUD at -2.15% versus MNST at 13.59%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV P/E ratioMonster Beverage P/E ratioAnheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV dividend yieldMonster Beverage dividend yieldAnheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV ROEMonster Beverage ROEAnheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV operating marginMonster Beverage operating marginAnheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV revenue growthMonster Beverage revenue growthAnheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV free cash flowMonster Beverage free cash flow
Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV & Monster Beverage appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 16, 2026.