The Coca-Cola Company (KO) vs Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ)
KO and STZ are evenly matched — 8 metrics each of 16.
A side-by-side comparison of The Coca-Cola Company and Constellation Brands, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
$82.62Consumer Defensive
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
$148.51Consumer Defensive
Total return — KO vs STZ
growth of $100 · last 30yKO +256.3%STZ +3585.1%STZ compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
KO STZ
KO vs STZ: by the numbers
- •KO is the larger company ($355.47B vs $25.47B market cap).
- •STZ trades at the lower earnings multiple (15.49 vs 25.98 P/E).
- •KO converts more revenue to profit (27.80% vs 18.46% net margin).
- •KO grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.07% vs 1.19% CAGR).
- •STZ pays the higher dividend yield (2.75% vs 1.88%).
Which is better, KO or STZ?
Metric tally: KO 8 · STZ 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueSTZ(lower P/E)
GrowthKO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeSTZ(higher dividend yield)
QualityKO(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | KO | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 25.98 | 15.49● |
| Forward P/E | 23.70 | 11.90● |
| P/S ratio | 7.23 | 2.82● |
| P/B ratio | 10.60 | 3.19● |
| PEG ratio | 0.98 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 20.26 | 11.70● |
| FCF yield | 3.52% | 6.95%● |
Profitability
| Metric | KO | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 61.74%● | 51.67% |
| Operating margin | 29.34% | 31.33%● |
| Net margin | 27.80%● | 18.46% |
| ROE | 40.74%● | 20.87% |
| ROIC | 13.00%● | 10.48% |
Dividends
| Metric | KO | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.88% | 2.75%● |
| Payout ratio | 50.82% | 42.52% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | KO | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 8.07%● | 1.19% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 11.12%● | -1.59% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 4.97%● | -1.57% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 11.29%● | -7.36% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, KO or STZ?
- It depends on your goal. value: STZ (lower P/E); growth: KO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: STZ (higher dividend yield); quality: KO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
- Is KO or STZ cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, STZ is cheaper: KO trades at a 25.98 P/E and STZ at 15.49.
- Which has grown faster, KO or STZ?
- Over the past five years, KO grew revenue faster — KO at a 8.07% CAGR versus STZ at 1.19%.
- Does KO or STZ pay a bigger dividend?
- KO yields 1.88% and STZ yields 2.75% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is KO or STZ more profitable?
- KO runs the higher net margin — KO at 27.80% versus STZ at 18.46%.
- Which has been the better investment, KO or STZ?
- Over the past 10-year, KO delivered the higher annualized total return — KO at 9.41% versus STZ at 1.25%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Coca-Cola P/E ratioConstellation Brands P/E ratioCoca-Cola dividend yieldConstellation Brands dividend yieldCoca-Cola ROEConstellation Brands ROECoca-Cola operating marginConstellation Brands operating marginCoca-Cola revenue growthConstellation Brands revenue growthCoca-Cola free cash flowConstellation Brands free cash flow
Coca-Cola & Constellation Brands appear in these rankings
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.