Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) vs Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ)
BUD leads on 10 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV and Constellation Brands, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
BUD
Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV
$82.91Consumer Defensive
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
$148.51Consumer Defensive
Total return — BUD vs STZ
growth of $100 · last 17yBUD +115.9%STZ +1020.8%STZ compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
BUD STZ
BUD vs STZ: by the numbers
- •BUD is the larger company ($160.41B vs $25.47B market cap).
- •BUD trades at the lower earnings multiple (13.57 vs 15.49 P/E).
- •STZ converts more revenue to profit (18.46% vs 10.14% net margin).
- •BUD grew revenue faster over the past five years (3.94% vs 1.19% CAGR).
- •STZ pays the higher dividend yield (2.75% vs 1.63%).
Which is better, BUD or STZ?
Metric tally: BUD 10 · STZ 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueBUD(lower P/E)
GrowthBUD(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeSTZ(higher dividend yield)
QualitySTZ(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | BUD | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 13.57● | 15.49 |
| Forward P/E | 17.10 | 11.90● |
| P/S ratio | 1.36● | 2.82 |
| P/B ratio | 1.88● | 3.19 |
| PEG ratio | 1.00 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.41● | 11.70 |
| FCF yield | 13.64%● | 6.95% |
Profitability
| Metric | BUD | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 55.67%● | 51.67% |
| Operating margin | 31.82% | 31.33% |
| Net margin | 10.14% | 18.46%● |
| ROE | 13.99% | 20.87%● |
| ROIC | 6.32% | 10.48%● |
Dividends
| Metric | BUD | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.63% | 2.75%● |
| Payout ratio | 38.95% | 42.52% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BUD | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 3.94%● | 1.19% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 37.66%● | -1.59% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 10.48%● | -1.57% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 2.64%● | -7.36% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, BUD or STZ?
- It depends on your goal. value: BUD (lower P/E); growth: BUD (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: STZ (higher dividend yield); quality: STZ (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, BUD leads 10 to 5.
- Is BUD or STZ cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, BUD is cheaper: BUD trades at a 13.57 P/E and STZ at 15.49.
- Which has grown faster, BUD or STZ?
- Over the past five years, BUD grew revenue faster — BUD at a 3.94% CAGR versus STZ at 1.19%.
- Does BUD or STZ pay a bigger dividend?
- BUD yields 1.63% and STZ yields 2.75% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BUD or STZ more profitable?
- STZ runs the higher net margin — BUD at 10.14% versus STZ at 18.46%.
- Which has been the better investment, BUD or STZ?
- Over the past 10-year, STZ delivered the higher annualized total return — BUD at -2.09% versus STZ at 1.25%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV P/E ratioConstellation Brands P/E ratioAnheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV dividend yieldConstellation Brands dividend yieldAnheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV ROEConstellation Brands ROEAnheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV operating marginConstellation Brands operating marginAnheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV revenue growthConstellation Brands revenue growthAnheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV free cash flowConstellation Brands free cash flow
Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV & Constellation Brands appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.