Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) vs Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ)

STZ leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Kimberly-Clark Corporation and Constellation Brands, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Kimberly-Clark Corporation logo
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
$33.95B
$102.29Consumer Defensive
Constellation Brands, Inc. logo
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
$25.47B
$148.51Consumer Defensive

Total return — KMB vs STZ

growth of $100 · last 30y
KMB +196.9%STZ +3585.1%STZ compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
101001k10kStart $100200120062011201620212026$297$3,685
KMB STZ

KMB vs STZ: by the numbers

  • •KMB is the larger company ($33.95B vs $25.47B market cap).
  • •STZ trades at the lower earnings multiple (15.49 vs 16.06 P/E).
  • •STZ converts more revenue to profit (18.46% vs 12.81% net margin).
  • •STZ grew revenue faster over the past five years (1.19% vs -2.61% CAGR).
  • •KMB pays the higher dividend yield (4.97% vs 2.75%).

Which is better, KMB or STZ?

Metric tally: KMB 7 · STZ 9

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueSTZ(lower P/E)
GrowthSTZ(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeKMB(higher dividend yield)
QualityKMB(higher ROIC)

Valuation

MetricKMBSTZ
P/E ratio16.0615.49●
Forward P/E13.4911.90●
P/S ratio2.06●2.82
P/B ratio18.983.19●
EV / EBITDA13.2611.70●
FCF yield7.56%●6.95%

Profitability

MetricKMBSTZ
Gross margin35.86%51.67%●
Operating margin13.27%31.33%●
Net margin12.81%18.46%●
ROE117.98%●20.87%
ROIC17.62%●10.48%

Dividends

MetricKMBSTZ
Dividend yield4.97%●2.75%
Payout ratio83.55%42.52%

Growth (annualized)

MetricKMBSTZ
Revenue CAGR (5Y)-2.61%1.19%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)-2.50%-1.59%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)3.38%●-1.57%
Total return CAGR (5Y)-0.94%●-7.36%

Frequently asked

Which is better, KMB or STZ?
It depends on your goal. value: STZ (lower P/E); growth: STZ (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: KMB (higher dividend yield); quality: KMB (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, STZ leads 9 to 7.
Is KMB or STZ cheaper?
On trailing earnings, STZ is cheaper: KMB trades at a 16.06 P/E and STZ at 15.49.
Which has grown faster, KMB or STZ?
Over the past five years, STZ grew revenue faster — KMB at a -2.61% CAGR versus STZ at 1.19%.
Does KMB or STZ pay a bigger dividend?
KMB yields 4.97% and STZ yields 2.75% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is KMB or STZ more profitable?
STZ runs the higher net margin — KMB at 12.81% versus STZ at 18.46%.
Which has been the better investment, KMB or STZ?
Over the past 10-year, STZ delivered the higher annualized total return — KMB at 1.05% versus STZ at 1.25%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full KMB analysisFull STZ analysisInteractive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Kimberly-Clark P/E ratioConstellation Brands P/E ratioKimberly-Clark dividend yieldConstellation Brands dividend yieldKimberly-Clark ROEConstellation Brands ROEKimberly-Clark operating marginConstellation Brands operating marginKimberly-Clark revenue growthConstellation Brands revenue growthKimberly-Clark free cash flowConstellation Brands free cash flow

Kimberly-Clark & Constellation Brands appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield StocksDividend AristocratsHighest ROE StocksHighest Operating Margin Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.