Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) vs Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ)
A side-by-side comparison of Kimberly-Clark Corporation and Constellation Brands, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
$98.15Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
$122.45Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — KMB vs STZ
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yKMB +25.0% (+2.3%/yr)STZ -13.2% (-1.4%/yr)KMB compounded faster over this window
KMB STZ
KMB vs STZ: by the numbers
- •KMB is the larger company ($32.58B vs $20.91B market cap).
- •STZ trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (11.68 vs 16.69 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •STZ converts more revenue to profit (20.14% vs 11.80% net margin).
- •STZ grew revenue faster over the past five years (0.86% vs -2.69% CAGR).
- •KMB pays the higher dividend yield (5.18% vs 3.37%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | KMB | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 16.69 | 11.68 |
| Forward P/E | 13.18 | 10.38 |
| P/S ratio | 1.97 | 2.31 |
| P/B ratio | 18.62 | 2.53 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.44 | 9.44 |
| FCF yield | 5.40% | 8.77% |
Profitability
| Metric | KMB | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 36.69% | 52.62% |
| Operating margin | 12.38% | 32.14% |
| Net margin | 11.80% | 20.14% |
| ROE | 111.71% | 22.10% |
| ROIC | 12.46% | 10.85% |
Dividends
| Metric | KMB | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 5.18% | 3.37% |
| Payout ratio | 86.73% | 39.12% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | KMB | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -2.69% | 0.86% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -2.50% | -1.59% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -8.19% | -1.73% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -2.69% | -9.18% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, KMB or STZ?
- STZ has the lower trailing P/E: KMB trades at 16.69 and STZ at 11.68. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, KMB or STZ?
- Over the past five years, STZ grew revenue faster — KMB at a -2.69% CAGR versus STZ at 0.86%.
- Does KMB or STZ pay a bigger dividend?
- KMB yields 5.18% and STZ yields 3.37% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is KMB or STZ more profitable?
- STZ runs the higher net margin — KMB at 11.80% versus STZ at 20.14%.
- How have KMB and STZ total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, KMB delivered 1.35% and STZ delivered -1.27% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Kimberly-Clark P/E ratioConstellation Brands P/E ratioKimberly-Clark dividend yieldConstellation Brands dividend yieldKimberly-Clark ROEConstellation Brands ROEKimberly-Clark operating marginConstellation Brands operating marginKimberly-Clark revenue growthConstellation Brands revenue growthKimberly-Clark free cash flowConstellation Brands free cash flow
Kimberly-Clark & Constellation Brands appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.