Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) vs The Procter & Gamble Company (PG)
A side-by-side comparison of Colgate-Palmolive Company and The Procter & Gamble Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
CL
Colgate-Palmolive Company
$86.80Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
$145.27Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT
Total return — CL vs PG
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCL +53.3% (+4.4%/yr)PG +112.8% (+7.8%/yr)PG compounded faster over this window
CL PG
CL vs PG: by the numbers
- •PG is the larger company ($345.34B vs $69.46B market cap).
- •PG trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (21.94 vs 34.39 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •PG converts more revenue to profit (18.44% vs 9.68% net margin).
- •CL grew revenue faster over the past five years (4.26% vs 2.72% CAGR).
- •PG pays the higher dividend yield (3.01% vs 2.39%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CL | PG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 34.39 | 21.94 |
| Forward P/E | 22.44 | 20.82 |
| P/S ratio | 3.30 | 3.97 |
| P/B ratio | 294.31 | 6.36 |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.23 | 16.17 |
| FCF yield | 5.55% | 4.61% |
Profitability
| Metric | CL | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 60.42% | 50.18% |
| Operating margin | 20.65% | 22.69% |
| Net margin | 9.68% | 18.44% |
| ROE | 863.14% | 29.54% |
| ROIC | 29.91% | 15.78% |
Dividends
| Metric | CL | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.39% | 3.01% |
| Payout ratio | 83.20% | 64.81% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CL | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 4.26% | 2.72% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -3.47% | 3.48% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 7.70% | 0.42% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 5.14% | 2.41% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CL or PG?
- PG has the lower trailing P/E: CL trades at 34.39 and PG at 21.94. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CL or PG?
- Over the past five years, CL grew revenue faster — CL at a 4.26% CAGR versus PG at 2.72%.
- Does CL or PG pay a bigger dividend?
- CL yields 2.39% and PG yields 3.01% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CL or PG more profitable?
- PG runs the higher net margin — CL at 9.68% versus PG at 18.44%.
- How have CL and PG total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CL delivered 4.62% and PG delivered 8.07% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Colgate-Palmolive P/E ratioProcter & Gamble P/E ratioColgate-Palmolive dividend yieldProcter & Gamble dividend yieldColgate-Palmolive ROEProcter & Gamble ROEColgate-Palmolive operating marginProcter & Gamble operating marginColgate-Palmolive revenue growthProcter & Gamble revenue growthColgate-Palmolive free cash flowProcter & Gamble free cash flow
Colgate-Palmolive & Procter & Gamble appear in these rankings
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.