Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) vs The Procter & Gamble Company (PG)
PG leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Colgate-Palmolive Company and The Procter & Gamble Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CL
Colgate-Palmolive Company
$89.45Consumer Defensive
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
$149.61Consumer Defensive
Total return — CL vs PG
growth of $100 · last 30yCL +774.4%PG +575.4%CL compounded faster
CL PG
CL vs PG: by the numbers
- •PG is the larger company ($348.38B vs $71.58B market cap).
- •PG trades at the lower earnings multiple (21.87 vs 34.75 P/E).
- •PG converts more revenue to profit (19.22% vs 10.04% net margin).
- •CL grew revenue faster over the past five years (4.46% vs 2.98% CAGR).
- •PG pays the higher dividend yield (2.85% vs 2.34%).
Which is better, CL or PG?
Metric tally: CL 7 · PG 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValuePG(lower P/E)
GrowthCL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomePG(higher dividend yield)
QualityCL(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | CL | PG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 34.75 | 21.87● |
| Forward P/E | 22.22 | 21.17● |
| P/S ratio | 3.46● | 4.17 |
| P/B ratio | 496.66 | 6.63● |
| PEG ratio | — | 3.09 |
| EV / EBITDA | 21.17 | 16.61● |
| FCF yield | 5.23%● | 4.16% |
Profitability
| Metric | CL | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 60.06%● | 50.33% |
| Operating margin | 21.21% | 23.24%● |
| Net margin | 10.04% | 19.22%● |
| ROE | 1439.31%● | 30.58% |
| ROIC | 30.34%● | 16.47% |
Dividends
| Metric | CL | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.34% | 2.85%● |
| Payout ratio | 79.17% | 63.85% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CL | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 4.46%● | 2.98% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -3.47% | 5.39%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 3.88%● | -1.64% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 3.78% | 4.73%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CL or PG?
- It depends on your goal. value: PG (lower P/E); growth: CL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: PG (higher dividend yield); quality: CL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, PG leads 9 to 7.
- Is CL or PG cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, PG is cheaper: CL trades at a 34.75 P/E and PG at 21.87.
- Which has grown faster, CL or PG?
- Over the past five years, CL grew revenue faster — CL at a 4.46% CAGR versus PG at 2.98%.
- Does CL or PG pay a bigger dividend?
- CL yields 2.34% and PG yields 2.85% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CL or PG more profitable?
- PG runs the higher net margin — CL at 10.04% versus PG at 19.22%.
- Which has been the better investment, CL or PG?
- Over the past 10-year, PG delivered the higher annualized total return — CL at 4.61% versus PG at 8.98%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Colgate-Palmolive P/E ratioProcter & Gamble P/E ratioColgate-Palmolive dividend yieldProcter & Gamble dividend yieldColgate-Palmolive ROEProcter & Gamble ROEColgate-Palmolive operating marginProcter & Gamble operating marginColgate-Palmolive revenue growthProcter & Gamble revenue growthColgate-Palmolive free cash flowProcter & Gamble free cash flow
Colgate-Palmolive & Procter & Gamble appear in these rankings
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.