Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) vs The Procter & Gamble Company (PG)
A side-by-side comparison of Colgate-Palmolive Company and The Procter & Gamble Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
CL
Colgate-Palmolive Company
$92.73Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
$148.75Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CL vs PG
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30yCL +1635.1%PG +1365.9%CL compounded faster
CL PG
CL vs PG: by the numbers
- •PG is the larger company ($346.38B vs $74.20B market cap).
- •PG trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (21.73 vs 35.73 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •PG converts more revenue to profit (19.22% vs 10.04% net margin).
- •CL grew revenue faster over the past five years (4.46% vs 2.98% CAGR).
- •PG pays the higher dividend yield (2.87% vs 2.27%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CL | PG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 35.73 | 21.73 |
| Forward P/E | 24.16 | 21.62 |
| P/S ratio | 3.56 | 4.14 |
| P/B ratio | 510.71 | 6.59 |
| PEG ratio | N/A | 3.01 |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.98 | 16.53 |
| FCF yield | 5.09% | 4.18% |
Profitability
| Metric | CL | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 60.06% | 50.33% |
| Operating margin | 21.21% | 23.24% |
| Net margin | 10.04% | 19.22% |
| ROE | 1439.31% | 30.58% |
| ROIC | 30.34% | 16.47% |
Dividends
| Metric | CL | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.27% | 2.87% |
| Payout ratio | 79.17% | 63.85% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CL | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 4.46% | 2.98% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -3.47% | 5.39% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 3.88% | -1.64% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 4.91% | 3.71% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CL or PG?
- PG has the lower trailing P/E: CL trades at 35.73 and PG at 21.73. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CL or PG?
- Over the past five years, CL grew revenue faster — CL at a 4.46% CAGR versus PG at 2.98%.
- Does CL or PG pay a bigger dividend?
- CL yields 2.27% and PG yields 2.87% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CL or PG more profitable?
- PG runs the higher net margin — CL at 10.04% versus PG at 19.22%.
- How have CL and PG total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CL delivered 4.96% and PG delivered 8.74% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Colgate-Palmolive P/E ratioProcter & Gamble P/E ratioColgate-Palmolive dividend yieldProcter & Gamble dividend yieldColgate-Palmolive ROEProcter & Gamble ROEColgate-Palmolive operating marginProcter & Gamble operating marginColgate-Palmolive revenue growthProcter & Gamble revenue growthColgate-Palmolive free cash flowProcter & Gamble free cash flow
Colgate-Palmolive & Procter & Gamble appear in these rankings
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.