Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) vs PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP)
PEP leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Colgate-Palmolive Company and PepsiCo, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CL
Colgate-Palmolive Company
$89.45Consumer Defensive
PEP
PepsiCo, Inc.
$144.27Consumer Defensive
Total return — CL vs PEP
growth of $100 · last 30yCL +774.4%PEP +330.7%CL compounded faster
CL PEP
CL vs PEP: by the numbers
- •PEP is the larger company ($197.21B vs $71.58B market cap).
- •PEP trades at the lower earnings multiple (22.65 vs 34.75 P/E).
- •CL converts more revenue to profit (10.04% vs 9.16% net margin).
- •PEP grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.00% vs 4.46% CAGR).
- •PEP pays the higher dividend yield (3.98% vs 2.34%).
Which is better, CL or PEP?
Metric tally: CL 7 · PEP 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValuePEP(lower P/E)
GrowthPEP(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomePEP(higher dividend yield)
QualityCL(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | CL | PEP |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 34.75 | 22.65● |
| Forward P/E | 22.22 | 15.81● |
| P/S ratio | 3.46 | 2.07● |
| P/B ratio | 496.66 | 9.25● |
| PEG ratio | — | 9.44 |
| EV / EBITDA | 21.17 | 15.92● |
| FCF yield | 5.23%● | 4.47% |
Profitability
| Metric | CL | PEP |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 60.06%● | 54.06% |
| Operating margin | 21.21%● | 14.79% |
| Net margin | 10.04%● | 9.16% |
| ROE | 1439.31%● | 40.89% |
| ROIC | 30.34%● | 13.29% |
Dividends
| Metric | CL | PEP |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.34% | 3.98%● |
| Payout ratio | 79.17% | 95.32% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CL | PEP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 4.46% | 6.00%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -3.47% | 2.40%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 3.88% | 6.62%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 3.78%● | 2.72% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CL or PEP?
- It depends on your goal. value: PEP (lower P/E); growth: PEP (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: PEP (higher dividend yield); quality: CL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, PEP leads 9 to 7.
- Is CL or PEP cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, PEP is cheaper: CL trades at a 34.75 P/E and PEP at 22.65.
- Which has grown faster, CL or PEP?
- Over the past five years, PEP grew revenue faster — CL at a 4.46% CAGR versus PEP at 6.00%.
- Does CL or PEP pay a bigger dividend?
- CL yields 2.34% and PEP yields 3.98% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CL or PEP more profitable?
- CL runs the higher net margin — CL at 10.04% versus PEP at 9.16%.
- Which has been the better investment, CL or PEP?
- Over the past 10-year, PEP delivered the higher annualized total return — CL at 4.61% versus PEP at 6.61%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Colgate-Palmolive P/E ratioPepsiCo P/E ratioColgate-Palmolive dividend yieldPepsiCo dividend yieldColgate-Palmolive ROEPepsiCo ROEColgate-Palmolive operating marginPepsiCo operating marginColgate-Palmolive revenue growthPepsiCo revenue growthColgate-Palmolive free cash flowPepsiCo free cash flow
Colgate-Palmolive & PepsiCo appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.