Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. (KDP) vs The Procter & Gamble Company (PG)
PG leads on 8 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and The Procter & Gamble Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
KDP
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.
$31.71Consumer Defensive
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
$149.61Consumer Defensive
Total return — KDP vs PG
growth of $100 · last 18yKDP +624.0%PG +127.0%KDP compounded faster
KDP PG
KDP vs PG: by the numbers
- •PG is the larger company ($348.38B vs $43.14B market cap).
- •PG trades at the lower earnings multiple (21.87 vs 23.49 P/E).
- •PG converts more revenue to profit (19.22% vs 10.81% net margin).
- •KDP grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.31% vs 2.98% CAGR).
- •KDP pays the higher dividend yield (2.90% vs 2.85%).
Which is better, KDP or PG?
Metric tally: KDP 7 · PG 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValuePG(lower P/E)
GrowthKDP(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityPG(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | KDP | PG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 23.49 | 21.87● |
| Forward P/E | 12.58● | 21.17 |
| P/S ratio | 2.55● | 4.17 |
| P/B ratio | 1.71● | 6.63 |
| PEG ratio | 0.41● | 3.09 |
| EV / EBITDA | 16.81 | 16.61 |
| FCF yield | 3.66% | 4.16%● |
Profitability
| Metric | KDP | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 53.78%● | 50.33% |
| Operating margin | 21.29% | 23.24%● |
| Net margin | 10.81% | 19.22%● |
| ROE | 7.25% | 30.58%● |
| ROIC | 5.62% | 16.47%● |
Dividends
| Metric | KDP | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.90% | 2.85% |
| Payout ratio | 60.13% | 63.85% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | KDP | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 7.31%● | 2.98% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 10.23%● | 5.39% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -5.79% | -1.64%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 0.48% | 4.73%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, KDP or PG?
- It depends on your goal. value: PG (lower P/E); growth: KDP (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: PG (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, PG leads 8 to 7.
- Is KDP or PG cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, PG is cheaper: KDP trades at a 23.49 P/E and PG at 21.87.
- Which has grown faster, KDP or PG?
- Over the past five years, KDP grew revenue faster — KDP at a 7.31% CAGR versus PG at 2.98%.
- Does KDP or PG pay a bigger dividend?
- KDP yields 2.90% and PG yields 2.85% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is KDP or PG more profitable?
- PG runs the higher net margin — KDP at 10.81% versus PG at 19.22%.
- Which has been the better investment, KDP or PG?
- Over the past 10-year, KDP delivered the higher annualized total return — KDP at 12.76% versus PG at 8.98%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Keurig Dr Pepper P/E ratioProcter & Gamble P/E ratioKeurig Dr Pepper dividend yieldProcter & Gamble dividend yieldKeurig Dr Pepper ROEProcter & Gamble ROEKeurig Dr Pepper operating marginProcter & Gamble operating marginKeurig Dr Pepper revenue growthProcter & Gamble revenue growthKeurig Dr Pepper free cash flowProcter & Gamble free cash flow
Keurig Dr Pepper & Procter & Gamble appear in these rankings
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.