Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) vs Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST)
CL leads on 8 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Colgate-Palmolive Company and Monster Beverage Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CL
Colgate-Palmolive Company
$89.45Consumer Defensive
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
$92.83Consumer Defensive
Total return — CL vs MNST
growth of $100 · last 30yCL +774.4%MNST +509143.5%MNST compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CL MNST
CL vs MNST: by the numbers
- •MNST is the larger company ($90.79B vs $71.58B market cap).
- •CL trades at the lower earnings multiple (34.75 vs 44.85 P/E).
- •MNST converts more revenue to profit (23.11% vs 10.04% net margin).
- •MNST grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.96% vs 4.46% CAGR).
- •CL pays a dividend (2.34% yield) while MNST does not currently pay one.
Which is better, CL or MNST?
Metric tally: CL 8 · MNST 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCL(lower P/E)
GrowthMNST(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityCL(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | CL | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 34.75● | 44.85 |
| Forward P/E | 22.22● | 35.95 |
| P/S ratio | 3.46● | 10.43 |
| P/B ratio | 496.66 | 10.51● |
| PEG ratio | — | 1.31 |
| EV / EBITDA | 21.17● | 32.31 |
| FCF yield | 5.23%● | 2.26% |
Profitability
| Metric | CL | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 60.06%● | 55.47% |
| Operating margin | 21.21% | 29.34%● |
| Net margin | 10.04% | 23.11%● |
| ROE | 1439.31%● | 23.28% |
| ROIC | 30.34%● | 21.74% |
Dividends
| Metric | CL | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.34% | — |
| Payout ratio | 79.17% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CL | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 4.46% | 12.96%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -3.47% | 7.95%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 3.88% | 10.53%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 3.78% | 14.70%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CL or MNST?
- It depends on your goal. value: CL (lower P/E); growth: MNST (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: CL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CL leads 8 to 7.
- Is CL or MNST cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CL is cheaper: CL trades at a 34.75 P/E and MNST at 44.85.
- Which has grown faster, CL or MNST?
- Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — CL at a 4.46% CAGR versus MNST at 12.96%.
- Does CL or MNST pay a bigger dividend?
- CL pays a dividend (2.34% yield) while MNST does not currently pay one.
- Is CL or MNST more profitable?
- MNST runs the higher net margin — CL at 10.04% versus MNST at 23.11%.
- Which has been the better investment, CL or MNST?
- Over the past 10-year, MNST delivered the higher annualized total return — CL at 4.61% versus MNST at 13.75%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Colgate-Palmolive P/E ratioMonster Beverage P/E ratioColgate-Palmolive dividend yieldMonster Beverage dividend yieldColgate-Palmolive ROEMonster Beverage ROEColgate-Palmolive operating marginMonster Beverage operating marginColgate-Palmolive revenue growthMonster Beverage revenue growthColgate-Palmolive free cash flowMonster Beverage free cash flow
Colgate-Palmolive & Monster Beverage appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.