Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) vs Walmart Inc. (WMT)
MNST leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics, though WMT is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Monster Beverage Corporation and Walmart Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
$92.83Consumer Defensive
WMT
Walmart Inc.
$121.04Consumer Defensive
Total return — MNST vs WMT
growth of $100 · last 30yMNST +509143.5%WMT +2695.4%MNST compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
MNST WMT
MNST vs WMT: by the numbers
- •WMT is the larger company ($963.25B vs $90.79B market cap).
- •WMT trades at the lower earnings multiple (42.47 vs 44.85 P/E).
- •MNST converts more revenue to profit (23.11% vs 3.18% net margin).
- •MNST grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.96% vs 5.20% CAGR).
- •WMT pays a dividend (0.80% yield) while MNST does not currently pay one.
Which is better, MNST or WMT?
Metric tally: MNST 9 · WMT 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueWMT(lower P/E)
GrowthMNST(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityMNST(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | MNST | WMT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 44.85 | 42.47● |
| Forward P/E | 35.95● | 36.88 |
| P/S ratio | 10.43 | 1.33● |
| P/B ratio | 10.51 | 10.26● |
| PEG ratio | 1.31● | 3.29 |
| EV / EBITDA | 32.31 | 23.28● |
| FCF yield | 2.26%● | 1.30% |
Profitability
| Metric | MNST | WMT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 55.47%● | 24.98% |
| Operating margin | 29.34%● | 4.16% |
| Net margin | 23.11%● | 3.18% |
| ROE | 23.28% | 24.44%● |
| ROIC | 21.74%● | 11.87% |
Dividends
| Metric | MNST | WMT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 0.80% |
| Payout ratio | — | 35.22% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MNST | WMT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 12.96%● | 5.20% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 7.95% | 10.95%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 10.53%● | -9.94% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 14.70% | 22.41%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, MNST or WMT?
- It depends on your goal. value: WMT (lower P/E); growth: MNST (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: MNST (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MNST leads 9 to 7.
- Is MNST or WMT cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, WMT is cheaper: MNST trades at a 44.85 P/E and WMT at 42.47.
- Which has grown faster, MNST or WMT?
- Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — MNST at a 12.96% CAGR versus WMT at 5.20%.
- Does MNST or WMT pay a bigger dividend?
- WMT pays a dividend (0.80% yield) while MNST does not currently pay one.
- Is MNST or WMT more profitable?
- MNST runs the higher net margin — MNST at 23.11% versus WMT at 3.18%.
- Which has been the better investment, MNST or WMT?
- Over the past 10-year, WMT delivered the higher annualized total return — MNST at 13.75% versus WMT at 19.73%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Monster Beverage P/E ratioWalmart P/E ratioMonster Beverage dividend yieldWalmart dividend yieldMonster Beverage ROEWalmart ROEMonster Beverage operating marginWalmart operating marginMonster Beverage revenue growthWalmart revenue growthMonster Beverage free cash flowWalmart free cash flow
Monster Beverage & Walmart appear in these rankings
Dividend AristocratsHighest ROIC StocksBest 10-Year Total Return StocksLargest Companies by Market Cap
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.