The Kroger Co. (KR) vs Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST)
MNST leads on 9 of 15 compared metrics, though KR is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of The Kroger Co. and Monster Beverage Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
KR
The Kroger Co.
$64.71Consumer Defensive
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
$92.83Consumer Defensive
Not enough overlapping price history to compare KR and MNST.
KR vs MNST: by the numbers
- •MNST is the larger company ($90.79B vs $39.90B market cap).
- •KR trades at the lower earnings multiple (42.02 vs 44.85 P/E).
- •MNST converts more revenue to profit (23.11% vs 0.69% net margin).
- •MNST grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.96% vs 2.19% CAGR).
- •KR pays a dividend (2.16% yield) while MNST does not currently pay one.
Which is better, KR or MNST?
Metric tally: KR 6 · MNST 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueKR(lower P/E)
GrowthMNST(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityMNST(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | KR | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 42.02● | 44.85 |
| Forward P/E | 11.54● | 35.95 |
| P/S ratio | 0.28● | 10.43 |
| P/B ratio | 6.89● | 10.51 |
| PEG ratio | — | 1.31 |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.80● | 32.31 |
| FCF yield | 8.64%● | 2.26% |
Profitability
| Metric | KR | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 23.30% | 55.47%● |
| Operating margin | 1.28% | 29.34%● |
| Net margin | 0.69% | 23.11%● |
| ROE | 17.14% | 23.28%● |
| ROIC | 4.70% | 21.74%● |
Dividends
| Metric | KR | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.16% | — |
| Payout ratio | 89.74% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | KR | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 2.19% | 12.96%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -13.96% | 7.95%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -2.23% | 10.53%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 13.20% | 14.70%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, KR or MNST?
- It depends on your goal. value: KR (lower P/E); growth: MNST (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: MNST (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MNST leads 9 to 6.
- Is KR or MNST cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, KR is cheaper: KR trades at a 42.02 P/E and MNST at 44.85.
- Which has grown faster, KR or MNST?
- Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — KR at a 2.19% CAGR versus MNST at 12.96%.
- Does KR or MNST pay a bigger dividend?
- KR pays a dividend (2.16% yield) while MNST does not currently pay one.
- Is KR or MNST more profitable?
- MNST runs the higher net margin — KR at 0.69% versus MNST at 23.11%.
- Which has been the better investment, KR or MNST?
- Over the past 10-year, MNST delivered the higher annualized total return — KR at 8.00% versus MNST at 13.75%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Kroger P/E ratioMonster Beverage P/E ratioKroger dividend yieldMonster Beverage dividend yieldKroger ROEMonster Beverage ROEKroger operating marginMonster Beverage operating marginKroger revenue growthMonster Beverage revenue growthKroger free cash flowMonster Beverage free cash flow
Kroger & Monster Beverage appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.