Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) vs Target Corporation (TGT)
A side-by-side comparison of Monster Beverage Corporation and Target Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
$97.74Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
TGT
Target Corporation
$144.18Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — MNST vs TGT
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30yMNST +457491.3%TGT +3345.1%MNST compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
MNST TGT
MNST vs TGT: by the numbers
- •MNST is the larger company ($95.59B vs $65.49B market cap).
- •TGT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (18.54 vs 46.05 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •MNST converts more revenue to profit (23.11% vs 3.24% net margin).
- •MNST grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.96% vs -0.29% CAGR).
- •TGT pays a dividend (3.25% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | MNST | TGT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 46.05 | 18.54 |
| Forward P/E | 41.41 | 19.22 |
| P/S ratio | 10.71 | 0.60 |
| P/B ratio | 10.80 | 3.90 |
| PEG ratio | 1.31 | N/A |
| EV / EBITDA | 34.17 | 9.98 |
| FCF yield | 2.20% | 4.89% |
Profitability
| Metric | MNST | TGT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 55.47% | 28.14% |
| Operating margin | 29.34% | 4.49% |
| Net margin | 23.11% | 3.24% |
| ROE | 23.28% | 21.04% |
| ROIC | 21.74% | 9.76% |
Dividends
| Metric | MNST | TGT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 3.25% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 55.88% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MNST | TGT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 12.96% | -0.29% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 7.95% | -1.34% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 10.53% | -17.01% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 14.91% | -8.75% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, MNST or TGT?
- TGT has the lower trailing P/E: MNST trades at 46.05 and TGT at 18.54. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, MNST or TGT?
- Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — MNST at a 12.96% CAGR versus TGT at -0.29%.
- Does MNST or TGT pay a bigger dividend?
- TGT pays a dividend (3.25% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
- Is MNST or TGT more profitable?
- MNST runs the higher net margin — MNST at 23.11% versus TGT at 3.24%.
- How have MNST and TGT total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, MNST delivered 13.77% and TGT delivered 9.69% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Monster Beverage P/E ratioTarget P/E ratioMonster Beverage dividend yieldTarget dividend yieldMonster Beverage ROETarget ROEMonster Beverage operating marginTarget operating marginMonster Beverage revenue growthTarget revenue growthMonster Beverage free cash flowTarget free cash flow
Monster Beverage & Target appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.