Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) vs Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST)
MNST leads on 8 of 15 compared metrics, though AMZN is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Amazon.com, Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
$238.55Consumer Cyclical
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
$93.23Consumer Defensive
Total return — AMZN vs MNST
growth of $100 · last 29yAMZN +250796.2%MNST +681804.6%MNST compounded faster
AMZN MNST
AMZN vs MNST: by the numbers
- •AMZN is the larger company ($2.65T vs $91.18B market cap).
- •AMZN trades at the lower earnings multiple (28.53 vs 45.04 P/E).
- •MNST converts more revenue to profit (23.11% vs 12.22% net margin).
- •MNST grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.96% vs 12.13% CAGR).
Which is better, AMZN or MNST?
Metric tally: AMZN 7 · MNST 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueAMZN(lower P/E)
GrowthMNST(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityMNST(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | AMZN | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 28.53● | 45.04 |
| Forward P/E | 23.69● | 36.10 |
| P/S ratio | 3.49● | 10.48 |
| P/B ratio | 5.87● | 10.56 |
| PEG ratio | 1.10● | 1.31 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.34● | 32.46 |
| FCF yield | — | 2.25% |
Profitability
| Metric | AMZN | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 50.60% | 55.47%● |
| Operating margin | 11.50% | 29.34%● |
| Net margin | 12.22% | 23.11%● |
| ROE | 20.55% | 23.28%● |
| ROIC | 10.70% | 21.74%● |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AMZN | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 12.13% | 12.96%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 27.90%● | 7.95% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -21.57% | 10.53%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 7.75% | 15.13%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AMZN or MNST?
- It depends on your goal. value: AMZN (lower P/E); growth: MNST (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: MNST (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MNST leads 8 to 7.
- Is AMZN or MNST cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, AMZN is cheaper: AMZN trades at a 28.53 P/E and MNST at 45.04.
- Which has grown faster, AMZN or MNST?
- Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — AMZN at a 12.13% CAGR versus MNST at 12.96%.
- Is AMZN or MNST more profitable?
- MNST runs the higher net margin — AMZN at 12.22% versus MNST at 23.11%.
- Which has been the better investment, AMZN or MNST?
- Over the past 10-year, AMZN delivered the higher annualized total return — AMZN at 21.27% versus MNST at 13.79%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Amazon.com P/E ratioMonster Beverage P/E ratioAmazon.com dividend yieldMonster Beverage dividend yieldAmazon.com ROEMonster Beverage ROEAmazon.com operating marginMonster Beverage operating marginAmazon.com revenue growthMonster Beverage revenue growthAmazon.com free cash flowMonster Beverage free cash flow
Amazon.com & Monster Beverage appear in these rankings
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.