Apple Inc. (AAPL) vs Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST)
AAPL leads on 11 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Apple Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
AAPL
Apple Inc.
$296.42Technology
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
$93.23Consumer Defensive
Total return — AAPL vs MNST
growth of $100 · last 30yAAPL +140423.4%MNST +572706.6%MNST compounded faster
AAPL MNST
AAPL vs MNST: by the numbers
- •AAPL is the larger company ($4.35T vs $91.18B market cap).
- •AAPL trades at the lower earnings multiple (35.84 vs 45.04 P/E).
- •AAPL converts more revenue to profit (27.15% vs 23.11% net margin).
- •MNST grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.96% vs 6.76% CAGR).
- •AAPL pays a dividend (0.35% yield) while MNST does not currently pay one.
Which is better, AAPL or MNST?
Metric tally: AAPL 11 · MNST 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueAAPL(lower P/E)
GrowthMNST(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityAAPL(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | AAPL | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 35.84● | 45.04 |
| Forward P/E | 30.76● | 36.10 |
| P/S ratio | 9.70● | 10.48 |
| P/B ratio | 41.11 | 10.56● |
| PEG ratio | 1.51 | 1.31● |
| EV / EBITDA | 27.60● | 32.46 |
| FCF yield | 2.95%● | 2.25% |
Profitability
| Metric | AAPL | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 47.86% | 55.47%● |
| Operating margin | 32.64%● | 29.34% |
| Net margin | 27.15%● | 23.11% |
| ROE | 115.10%● | 23.28% |
| ROIC | 51.97%● | 21.74% |
Dividends
| Metric | AAPL | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.35% | — |
| Payout ratio | 14.02% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AAPL | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 6.76% | 12.96%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 17.73%● | 7.95% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 7.38% | 10.53%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 18.59%● | 15.13% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AAPL or MNST?
- It depends on your goal. value: AAPL (lower P/E); growth: MNST (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: AAPL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, AAPL leads 11 to 5.
- Is AAPL or MNST cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, AAPL is cheaper: AAPL trades at a 35.84 P/E and MNST at 45.04.
- Which has grown faster, AAPL or MNST?
- Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — AAPL at a 6.76% CAGR versus MNST at 12.96%.
- Does AAPL or MNST pay a bigger dividend?
- AAPL pays a dividend (0.35% yield) while MNST does not currently pay one.
- Is AAPL or MNST more profitable?
- AAPL runs the higher net margin — AAPL at 27.15% versus MNST at 23.11%.
- Which has been the better investment, AAPL or MNST?
- Over the past 10-year, AAPL delivered the higher annualized total return — AAPL at 29.64% versus MNST at 13.79%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Apple P/E ratioMonster Beverage P/E ratioApple dividend yieldMonster Beverage dividend yieldApple ROEMonster Beverage ROEApple operating marginMonster Beverage operating marginApple revenue growthMonster Beverage revenue growthApple free cash flowMonster Beverage free cash flow
Apple & Monster Beverage appear in these rankings
Highest ROE StocksHighest ROIC StocksHighest Operating Margin StocksBest 10-Year Total Return Stocks
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.