Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) vs Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST)
META leads on 14 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Meta Platforms, Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 16, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
$593.48Communication Services
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
$93.23Consumer Defensive
Total return — META vs MNST
growth of $100 · last 14yMETA +1452.4%MNST +702.3%META compounded faster
META MNST
META vs MNST: by the numbers
- •META is the larger company ($1.51T vs $91.18B market cap).
- •META trades at the lower earnings multiple (21.58 vs 45.04 P/E).
- •META converts more revenue to profit (32.84% vs 23.11% net margin).
- •META grew revenue faster over the past five years (17.89% vs 12.96% CAGR).
- •META pays a dividend (0.35% yield) while MNST does not currently pay one.
Which is better, META or MNST?
Metric tally: META 14 · MNST 2It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueMETA(lower P/E)
GrowthMETA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityMNST(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | META | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 21.58● | 45.04 |
| Forward P/E | 16.95● | 36.10 |
| P/S ratio | 7.08● | 10.48 |
| P/B ratio | 6.24● | 10.56 |
| PEG ratio | 1.16● | 1.31 |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.97● | 32.46 |
| FCF yield | 3.17%● | 2.25% |
Profitability
| Metric | META | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 81.94%● | 55.47% |
| Operating margin | 41.21%● | 29.34% |
| Net margin | 32.84%● | 23.11% |
| ROE | 28.97%● | 23.28% |
| ROIC | 17.95% | 21.74%● |
Dividends
| Metric | META | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.35% | — |
| Payout ratio | 8.76% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | META | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 17.89%● | 12.96% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 18.60%● | 7.95% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 14.84%● | 10.53% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 12.20% | 15.13%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, META or MNST?
- It depends on your goal. value: META (lower P/E); growth: META (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: MNST (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, META leads 14 to 2.
- Is META or MNST cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, META is cheaper: META trades at a 21.58 P/E and MNST at 45.04.
- Which has grown faster, META or MNST?
- Over the past five years, META grew revenue faster — META at a 17.89% CAGR versus MNST at 12.96%.
- Does META or MNST pay a bigger dividend?
- META pays a dividend (0.35% yield) while MNST does not currently pay one.
- Is META or MNST more profitable?
- META runs the higher net margin — META at 32.84% versus MNST at 23.11%.
- Which has been the better investment, META or MNST?
- Over the past 10-year, META delivered the higher annualized total return — META at 17.98% versus MNST at 13.79%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Meta Platforms P/E ratioMonster Beverage P/E ratioMeta Platforms dividend yieldMonster Beverage dividend yieldMeta Platforms ROEMonster Beverage ROEMeta Platforms operating marginMonster Beverage operating marginMeta Platforms revenue growthMonster Beverage revenue growthMeta Platforms free cash flowMonster Beverage free cash flow
Meta Platforms & Monster Beverage appear in these rankings
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 16, 2026.