Is MNST or PINS cheaper?

On trailing earnings, PINS is cheaper: MNST trades at a 45.04 P/E and PINS at 44.79.

Which has grown faster, MNST or PINS?

Over the past five years, PINS grew revenue faster — MNST at a 12.96% CAGR versus PINS at 18.08%.

Is MNST or PINS more profitable?

MNST runs the higher net margin — MNST at 23.11% versus PINS at 7.64%.

Which has been the better investment, MNST or PINS?

Over the past 5-year, MNST delivered the higher annualized total return — MNST at 13.79% versus PINS at -21.28%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) vs Pinterest, Inc. (PINS)

PINS leads on 6 of 11 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Monster Beverage Corporation and Pinterest, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

MNST

Monster Beverage Corporation

$91.18B

$93.23Consumer Defensive

PINS

Pinterest, Inc.

$14.18B

$21.33Communication Services

Total return — MNST vs PINS

growth of $100 · last 7y

MNST +237.8%PINS -12.6%MNST compounded faster

MNST PINS

MNST vs PINS: by the numbers

•MNST is the larger company ($91.18B vs $14.18B market cap).
•PINS trades at the lower earnings multiple (44.79 vs 45.04 P/E).
•MNST converts more revenue to profit (23.11% vs 7.64% net margin).
•PINS grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.08% vs 12.96% CAGR).

Which is better, MNST or PINS?

Metric tally: MNST 5 · PINS 6

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthPINS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityMNST(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MNST	PINS
P/E ratio	45.04	44.79
Forward P/E	36.10	—
P/S ratio	10.48	3.10●
P/B ratio	10.56	4.76●
PEG ratio	1.31	—
EV / EBITDA	32.46	32.54
FCF yield	2.25%	8.89%●

Profitability

Metric	MNST	PINS
Gross margin	55.47%	79.86%●
Operating margin	29.34%●	7.36%
Net margin	23.11%●	7.64%
ROE	23.28%●	11.73%
ROIC	21.74%●	5.88%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MNST	PINS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	12.96%	18.08%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	7.95%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	10.53%	39.27%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	15.13%●	-21.28%

Frequently asked

Which is better, MNST or PINS?: It depends on your goal. growth: PINS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: MNST (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, PINS leads 6 to 5.
Is MNST or PINS cheaper?: On trailing earnings, PINS is cheaper: MNST trades at a 45.04 P/E and PINS at 44.79.
Which has grown faster, MNST or PINS?: Over the past five years, PINS grew revenue faster — MNST at a 12.96% CAGR versus PINS at 18.08%.
Is MNST or PINS more profitable?: MNST runs the higher net margin — MNST at 23.11% versus PINS at 7.64%.
Which has been the better investment, MNST or PINS?: Over the past 5-year, MNST delivered the higher annualized total return — MNST at 13.79% versus PINS at -21.28%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MNST analysis Full PINS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Monster Beverage P/E ratio Pinterest P/E ratio Monster Beverage dividend yield Pinterest dividend yield Monster Beverage ROE Pinterest ROE Monster Beverage operating margin Pinterest operating margin Monster Beverage revenue growth Pinterest revenue growth Monster Beverage free cash flow Pinterest free cash flow

Monster Beverage & Pinterest appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.