Which has grown faster, MNST or SNAP?

Over the past five years, SNAP grew revenue faster — MNST at a 12.96% CAGR versus SNAP at 16.73%.

Is MNST or SNAP more profitable?

MNST runs the higher net margin — MNST at 23.11% versus SNAP at -6.72%.

Which has been the better investment, MNST or SNAP?

Over the past 5-year, MNST delivered the higher annualized total return — MNST at 13.79% versus SNAP at -37.99%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) vs Snap Inc. (SNAP)

MNST leads on 6 of 10 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Monster Beverage Corporation and Snap Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

MNST

Monster Beverage Corporation

$91.18B

$93.23Consumer Defensive

SNAP

Snap Inc.

$9.66B

$5.71Communication Services

Total return — MNST vs SNAP

growth of $100 · last 9y

MNST +293.7%SNAP -76.7%MNST compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

MNST SNAP

MNST vs SNAP: by the numbers

•MNST is the larger company ($91.18B vs $9.66B market cap).
•MNST is profitable (23.11% net margin) while SNAP runs a net loss (-6.72%).
•SNAP grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.73% vs 12.96% CAGR).

Which is better, MNST or SNAP?

Metric tally: MNST 6 · SNAP 4

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthSNAP(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityMNST(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MNST	SNAP
P/E ratio	45.04	—
Forward P/E	36.10●	46.04
P/S ratio	10.48	1.58●
P/B ratio	10.56	4.62●
PEG ratio	1.31	—
EV / EBITDA	32.46	—
FCF yield	2.25%	6.32%●

Profitability

Metric	MNST	SNAP
Gross margin	55.47%	55.77%
Operating margin	29.34%●	-6.77%
Net margin	23.11%●	-6.72%
ROE	23.28%●	-19.66%
ROIC	21.74%●	-8.20%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MNST	SNAP
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	12.96%	16.73%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	7.95%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	10.53%	—
Total return CAGR (5Y)	15.13%●	-37.99%

Frequently asked

Which is better, MNST or SNAP?: It depends on your goal. growth: SNAP (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: MNST (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MNST leads 6 to 4.
Which has grown faster, MNST or SNAP?: Over the past five years, SNAP grew revenue faster — MNST at a 12.96% CAGR versus SNAP at 16.73%.
Is MNST or SNAP more profitable?: MNST runs the higher net margin — MNST at 23.11% versus SNAP at -6.72%.
Which has been the better investment, MNST or SNAP?: Over the past 5-year, MNST delivered the higher annualized total return — MNST at 13.79% versus SNAP at -37.99%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MNST analysis Full SNAP analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Monster Beverage P/E ratio Snap P/E ratio Monster Beverage dividend yield Snap dividend yield Monster Beverage ROE Snap ROE Monster Beverage operating margin Snap operating margin Monster Beverage revenue growth Snap revenue growth Monster Beverage free cash flow Snap free cash flow

Monster Beverage & Snap appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.