Which has grown faster, MNST or SNAP?

Over the past five years, SNAP grew revenue faster — MNST at a 12.36% CAGR versus SNAP at 13.71%.

Is MNST or SNAP more profitable?

MNST runs the higher net margin — MNST at 23.08% versus SNAP at -4.90%.

How have MNST and SNAP total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, MNST delivered 12.44% and SNAP delivered -41.06% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) vs Snap Inc. (SNAP)

A side-by-side comparison of Monster Beverage Corporation and Snap Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Different business models: MNST is classified in Consumer Defensive; SNAP is classified in Communication Services. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

MNST

Monster Beverage Corporation

$84.89B

$43.40Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

SNAP

Snap Inc.

$9.60B

$5.68Communication ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:02 PM EDT

Total return — MNST vs SNAP

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

MNST +325.5% (+15.6%/yr)SNAP -78.3% (-14.2%/yr)MNST compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

MNST SNAP

MNST vs SNAP: by the numbers

•MNST is the larger company ($84.89B vs $9.60B market cap).
•MNST is profitable (23.08% net margin) while SNAP runs a net loss (-4.90%).
•SNAP grew revenue faster over the past five years (13.71% vs 12.36% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	MNST	SNAP
P/E ratio	40.00	N/A
Forward P/E	37.40	N/A
P/S ratio	9.21	1.51
P/B ratio	9.07	4.98
EV / EBITDA	28.61	N/A
FCF yield	2.47%	7.35%

Profitability

Metric	MNST	SNAP
Gross margin	55.55%	57.31%
Operating margin	29.16%	-5.10%
Net margin	23.08%	-4.90%
ROE	22.72%	-16.15%
ROIC	21.32%	-5.19%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	MNST	SNAP
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	12.36%	13.71%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	7.95%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	7.93%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	12.44%	-41.06%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, MNST or SNAP?: Over the past five years, SNAP grew revenue faster — MNST at a 12.36% CAGR versus SNAP at 13.71%.
Is MNST or SNAP more profitable?: MNST runs the higher net margin — MNST at 23.08% versus SNAP at -4.90%.
How have MNST and SNAP total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, MNST delivered 12.44% and SNAP delivered -41.06% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full MNST analysis Full SNAP analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Monster Beverage P/E ratio Monster Beverage ROE Snap ROE Monster Beverage operating margin Snap operating margin Monster Beverage revenue growth Snap revenue growth Monster Beverage free cash flow Snap free cash flow

Monster Beverage & Snap appear in these rankings

Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.