Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) vs Microsoft Corporation (MSFT)
MSFT leads on 12 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Monster Beverage Corporation and Microsoft Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
$93.23Consumer Defensive
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
$390.74Technology
Total return — MNST vs MSFT
growth of $100 · last 30yMNST +572706.6%MSFT +5029.1%MNST compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
MNST MSFT
MNST vs MSFT: by the numbers
- •MSFT is the larger company ($2.97T vs $91.18B market cap).
- •MSFT trades at the lower earnings multiple (23.26 vs 45.04 P/E).
- •MSFT converts more revenue to profit (39.34% vs 23.11% net margin).
- •MSFT grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.75% vs 12.96% CAGR).
- •MSFT pays a dividend (0.91% yield) while MNST does not currently pay one.
Which is better, MNST or MSFT?
Metric tally: MNST 3 · MSFT 12It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueMSFT(lower P/E)
GrowthMSFT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | MNST | MSFT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 45.04 | 23.26● |
| Forward P/E | 36.10 | 20.09● |
| P/S ratio | 10.48 | 9.14● |
| P/B ratio | 10.56 | 7.02● |
| PEG ratio | 1.31● | 2.34 |
| EV / EBITDA | 32.46 | 14.60● |
| FCF yield | 2.25% | 2.51%● |
Profitability
| Metric | MNST | MSFT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 55.47% | 68.31%● |
| Operating margin | 29.34% | 46.80%● |
| Net margin | 23.11% | 39.34%● |
| ROE | 23.28% | 30.22%● |
| ROIC | 21.74% | 21.63% |
Dividends
| Metric | MNST | MSFT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 0.91% |
| Payout ratio | — | 25.99% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MNST | MSFT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 12.96% | 14.75%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 7.95% | 18.68%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 10.53%● | 6.27% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 15.13%● | 10.02% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, MNST or MSFT?
- It depends on your goal. value: MSFT (lower P/E); growth: MSFT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR). Across all compared metrics, MSFT leads 12 to 3.
- Is MNST or MSFT cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, MSFT is cheaper: MNST trades at a 45.04 P/E and MSFT at 23.26.
- Which has grown faster, MNST or MSFT?
- Over the past five years, MSFT grew revenue faster — MNST at a 12.96% CAGR versus MSFT at 14.75%.
- Does MNST or MSFT pay a bigger dividend?
- MSFT pays a dividend (0.91% yield) while MNST does not currently pay one.
- Is MNST or MSFT more profitable?
- MSFT runs the higher net margin — MNST at 23.11% versus MSFT at 39.34%.
- Which has been the better investment, MNST or MSFT?
- Over the past 10-year, MSFT delivered the higher annualized total return — MNST at 13.79% versus MSFT at 24.71%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Monster Beverage P/E ratioMicrosoft P/E ratioMonster Beverage dividend yieldMicrosoft dividend yieldMonster Beverage ROEMicrosoft ROEMonster Beverage operating marginMicrosoft operating marginMonster Beverage revenue growthMicrosoft revenue growthMonster Beverage free cash flowMicrosoft free cash flow
Monster Beverage & Microsoft appear in these rankings
Highest ROE StocksHighest ROIC StocksHighest Operating Margin StocksBest 10-Year Total Return Stocks
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.