Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) vs Oracle Corporation (ORCL)
ORCL leads on 10 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Monster Beverage Corporation and Oracle Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
$93.23Consumer Defensive
ORCL
Oracle Corporation
$184.13Technology
Total return — MNST vs ORCL
growth of $100 · last 30yMNST +572706.6%ORCL +5025.0%MNST compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
MNST ORCL
MNST vs ORCL: by the numbers
- •ORCL is the larger company ($554.21B vs $91.18B market cap).
- •ORCL trades at the lower earnings multiple (31.58 vs 45.04 P/E).
- •ORCL converts more revenue to profit (25.37% vs 23.11% net margin).
- •MNST grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.96% vs 10.72% CAGR).
- •ORCL pays a dividend (1.09% yield) while MNST does not currently pay one.
Which is better, MNST or ORCL?
Metric tally: MNST 5 · ORCL 10It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueORCL(lower P/E)
GrowthMNST(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityMNST(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | MNST | ORCL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 45.04 | 31.58● |
| Forward P/E | 36.10 | 16.92● |
| P/S ratio | 10.48 | 7.97● |
| P/B ratio | 10.56● | 12.47 |
| PEG ratio | 1.31 | 1.26● |
| EV / EBITDA | 32.46 | 20.61● |
| FCF yield | 2.25% | — |
Profitability
| Metric | MNST | ORCL |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 55.47% | 65.81%● |
| Operating margin | 29.34% | 30.85%● |
| Net margin | 23.11% | 25.37%● |
| ROE | 23.28% | 39.69%● |
| ROIC | 21.74%● | 7.99% |
Dividends
| Metric | MNST | ORCL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 1.09% |
| Payout ratio | — | 33.67% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | MNST | ORCL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 12.96%● | 10.72% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 7.95%● | 4.93% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 10.53%● | -13.18% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 15.13% | 20.36%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, MNST or ORCL?
- It depends on your goal. value: ORCL (lower P/E); growth: MNST (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: MNST (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ORCL leads 10 to 5.
- Is MNST or ORCL cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, ORCL is cheaper: MNST trades at a 45.04 P/E and ORCL at 31.58.
- Which has grown faster, MNST or ORCL?
- Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — MNST at a 12.96% CAGR versus ORCL at 10.72%.
- Does MNST or ORCL pay a bigger dividend?
- ORCL pays a dividend (1.09% yield) while MNST does not currently pay one.
- Is MNST or ORCL more profitable?
- ORCL runs the higher net margin — MNST at 23.11% versus ORCL at 25.37%.
- Which has been the better investment, MNST or ORCL?
- Over the past 10-year, ORCL delivered the higher annualized total return — MNST at 13.79% versus ORCL at 19.26%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Monster Beverage P/E ratioOracle P/E ratioMonster Beverage dividend yieldOracle dividend yieldMonster Beverage ROEOracle ROEMonster Beverage operating marginOracle operating marginMonster Beverage revenue growthOracle revenue growthMonster Beverage free cash flowOracle free cash flow
Monster Beverage & Oracle appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.