Which has the lower trailing P/E, COST or MNST?

MNST has the lower trailing P/E: COST trades at 45.56 and MNST at 41.31. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, COST or MNST?

Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — COST at a 9.48% CAGR versus MNST at 12.36%.

Does COST or MNST pay a bigger dividend?

COST pays a dividend (0.61% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is COST or MNST more profitable?

MNST runs the higher net margin — COST at 3.01% versus MNST at 23.08%.

How have COST and MNST total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, COST delivered 20.59% and MNST delivered 13.43% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) vs Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST)

A side-by-side comparison of Costco Wholesale Corporation and Monster Beverage Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

COST

Costco Wholesale Corporation

$401.64B

$905.67Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 15, 2026, 3:15 PM EDT

MNST

Monster Beverage Corporation

$87.67B

$44.82Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 15, 2026, 3:15 PM EDT

Total return — COST vs MNST

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

COST +530.0% (+20.2%/yr)MNST +255.7% (+13.5%/yr)COST compounded faster over this window

COST MNST

COST vs MNST: by the numbers

•COST is the larger company ($401.64B vs $87.67B market cap).
•MNST trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (41.31 vs 45.56 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•MNST converts more revenue to profit (23.08% vs 3.01% net margin).
•MNST grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.36% vs 9.48% CAGR).
•COST pays a dividend (0.61% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	COST	MNST
P/E ratio	45.56	41.31
Forward P/E	39.96	38.63
P/S ratio	1.37	9.51
P/B ratio	11.99	9.36
EV / EBITDA	28.35	29.57
FCF yield	2.19%	2.39%

Profitability

Metric	COST	MNST
Gross margin	12.88%	55.55%
Operating margin	3.82%	29.16%
Net margin	3.01%	23.08%
ROE	26.38%	22.72%
ROIC	19.01%	21.32%

Dividends

Metric	COST	MNST
Dividend yield	0.61%	N/A
Payout ratio	27.87%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	COST	MNST
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.48%	12.36%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	15.04%	7.95%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	4.95%	7.93%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	14.94%	12.59%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, COST or MNST?: MNST has the lower trailing P/E: COST trades at 45.56 and MNST at 41.31. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, COST or MNST?: Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — COST at a 9.48% CAGR versus MNST at 12.36%.
Does COST or MNST pay a bigger dividend?: COST pays a dividend (0.61% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is COST or MNST more profitable?: MNST runs the higher net margin — COST at 3.01% versus MNST at 23.08%.
How have COST and MNST total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, COST delivered 20.59% and MNST delivered 13.43% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full COST analysis Full MNST analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Costco Wholesale P/E ratio Monster Beverage P/E ratio Costco Wholesale dividend yield Costco Wholesale ROE Monster Beverage ROE Costco Wholesale operating margin Monster Beverage operating margin Costco Wholesale revenue growth Monster Beverage revenue growth Costco Wholesale free cash flow Monster Beverage free cash flow

Costco Wholesale & Monster Beverage appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks Largest Companies by Market Cap

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.