Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) vs Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST)
A side-by-side comparison of Costco Wholesale Corporation and Monster Beverage Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 1, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
$951.89Consumer DefensiveAt close: Jul 31, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
$96.38Consumer DefensiveAt close: Jul 31, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — COST vs MNST
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30yCOST +11886.5%MNST +493371.9%MNST compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
COST MNST
COST vs MNST: by the numbers
- •COST is the larger company ($422.14B vs $94.26B market cap).
- •MNST trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (46.56 vs 47.88 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •MNST converts more revenue to profit (23.11% vs 3.01% net margin).
- •MNST grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.96% vs 9.48% CAGR).
- •COST pays a dividend (0.56% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | COST | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 47.88 | 46.56 |
| Forward P/E | 46.34 | 41.87 |
| P/S ratio | 1.44 | 10.83 |
| P/B ratio | 12.62 | 10.91 |
| PEG ratio | 5.23 | 1.31 |
| EV / EBITDA | 29.90 | 34.55 |
| FCF yield | 2.08% | 2.17% |
Profitability
| Metric | COST | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 12.88% | 55.47% |
| Operating margin | 3.82% | 29.34% |
| Net margin | 3.01% | 23.11% |
| ROE | 26.38% | 23.28% |
| ROIC | 19.44% | 21.74% |
Dividends
| Metric | COST | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.56% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 29.44% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | COST | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.48% | 12.96% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 15.04% | 7.95% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 4.95% | 10.53% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 17.97% | 15.36% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, COST or MNST?
- MNST has the lower trailing P/E: COST trades at 47.88 and MNST at 46.56. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, COST or MNST?
- Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — COST at a 9.48% CAGR versus MNST at 12.96%.
- Does COST or MNST pay a bigger dividend?
- COST pays a dividend (0.56% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
- Is COST or MNST more profitable?
- MNST runs the higher net margin — COST at 3.01% versus MNST at 23.11%.
- How have COST and MNST total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, COST delivered 19.98% and MNST delivered 13.66% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Costco Wholesale P/E ratioMonster Beverage P/E ratioCostco Wholesale dividend yieldMonster Beverage dividend yieldCostco Wholesale ROEMonster Beverage ROECostco Wholesale operating marginMonster Beverage operating marginCostco Wholesale revenue growthMonster Beverage revenue growthCostco Wholesale free cash flowMonster Beverage free cash flow
Costco Wholesale & Monster Beverage appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 1, 2026.