Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) vs Walmart Inc. (WMT)

A side-by-side comparison of Costco Wholesale Corporation and Walmart Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total returnCOST vs WMT

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30y
COST +11175.1%WMT +4540.3%COST compounded faster
05k10kStart $100200120062011201620212026$11,275$4,640
COST WMT

COST vs WMT: by the numbers

  • WMT is the larger company ($900.06B vs $428.66B market cap).
  • WMT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (39.21 vs 47.87 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
  • WMT converts more revenue to profit (3.13% vs 3.01% net margin).
  • COST grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.48% vs 5.20% CAGR).
  • WMT pays the higher dividend yield (0.86% vs 0.56%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricCOSTWMT
P/E ratio47.8739.21
Forward P/E46.3342.36
P/S ratio1.441.23
P/B ratio12.629.48
PEG ratio5.233.29
EV / EBITDA29.8921.35
FCF yield2.08%1.40%

Profitability

MetricCOSTWMT
Gross margin12.88%24.98%
Operating margin3.82%4.16%
Net margin3.01%3.13%
ROE26.38%24.10%
ROIC19.44%11.87%

Dividends

MetricCOSTWMT
Dividend yield0.56%0.86%
Payout ratio29.44%35.22%

Growth (annualized)

MetricCOSTWMT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)9.48%5.20%
EPS CAGR (5Y)15.04%10.95%
FCF CAGR (5Y)4.95%-9.94%
Total return CAGR (5Y)18.31%20.16%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, COST or WMT?
WMT has the lower trailing P/E: COST trades at 47.87 and WMT at 39.21. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, COST or WMT?
Over the past five years, COST grew revenue faster — COST at a 9.48% CAGR versus WMT at 5.20%.
Does COST or WMT pay a bigger dividend?
COST yields 0.56% and WMT yields 0.86% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is COST or WMT more profitable?
WMT runs the higher net margin — COST at 3.01% versus WMT at 3.13%.
How have COST and WMT total returns compared?
Over the past 10 years, COST delivered 20.06% and WMT delivered 18.43% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.