Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) vs Target Corporation (TGT)

A side-by-side comparison of Costco Wholesale Corporation and Target Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total returnCOST vs TGT

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y
COST +537.6% (+20.4%/yr)TGT +207.6% (+11.9%/yr)COST compounded faster over this window
200400600Start $10020182020202220242026$638$308
COST TGT

COST vs TGT: by the numbers

  • COST is the larger company ($401.25B vs $70.78B market cap).
  • TGT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (16.16 vs 45.51 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
  • TGT converts more revenue to profit (4.08% vs 3.01% net margin).
  • COST grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.48% vs -0.29% CAGR).
  • TGT pays the higher dividend yield (2.91% vs 0.61%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricCOSTTGT
P/E ratio45.5116.16
Forward P/E39.9215.46
P/S ratio1.370.66
P/B ratio11.973.97
EV / EBITDA28.329.14
FCF yield2.19%6.43%

Profitability

MetricCOSTTGT
Gross margin12.88%29.30%
Operating margin3.82%5.59%
Net margin3.01%4.08%
ROE26.38%24.61%
ROIC19.01%11.35%

Dividends

MetricCOSTTGT
Dividend yield0.61%2.91%
Payout ratio27.87%47.51%

Growth (annualized)

MetricCOSTTGT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)9.48%-0.29%
EPS CAGR (5Y)15.04%-1.34%
FCF CAGR (5Y)4.95%-6.17%
Total return CAGR (5Y)14.89%-5.58%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, COST or TGT?
TGT has the lower trailing P/E: COST trades at 45.51 and TGT at 16.16. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, COST or TGT?
Over the past five years, COST grew revenue faster — COST at a 9.48% CAGR versus TGT at -0.29%.
Does COST or TGT pay a bigger dividend?
COST yields 0.61% and TGT yields 2.91% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is COST or TGT more profitable?
TGT runs the higher net margin — COST at 3.01% versus TGT at 4.08%.
How have COST and TGT total returns compared?
Over the past 10 years, COST delivered 20.56% and TGT delivered 11.93% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.