Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) vs The Kroger Co. (KR)

A side-by-side comparison of Costco Wholesale Corporation and The Kroger Co. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total returnCOST vs KR

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y
COST +537.6% (+20.4%/yr)KR +123.8% (+8.4%/yr)COST compounded faster over this window
200400600Start $10020182020202220242026$638$224
COST KR

COST vs KR: by the numbers

  • COST is the larger company ($401.25B vs $35.83B market cap).
  • KR trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (34.20 vs 45.51 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
  • COST converts more revenue to profit (3.01% vs 0.71% net margin).
  • COST grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.48% vs 2.33% CAGR).
  • KR pays the higher dividend yield (2.55% vs 0.61%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricCOSTKR
P/E ratio45.5134.20
Forward P/E39.9211.26
P/S ratio1.370.24
P/B ratio11.975.54
EV / EBITDA28.3210.47
FCF yield2.19%8.05%

Profitability

MetricCOSTKR
Gross margin12.88%23.18%
Operating margin3.82%1.33%
Net margin3.01%0.71%
ROE26.38%16.27%
ROIC19.01%4.89%

Dividends

MetricCOSTKR
Dividend yield0.61%2.55%
Payout ratio27.87%84.21%

Growth (annualized)

MetricCOSTKR
Revenue CAGR (5Y)9.48%2.33%
EPS CAGR (5Y)15.04%-13.96%
FCF CAGR (5Y)4.95%-1.62%
Total return CAGR (5Y)14.89%6.39%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, COST or KR?
KR has the lower trailing P/E: COST trades at 45.51 and KR at 34.20. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, COST or KR?
Over the past five years, COST grew revenue faster — COST at a 9.48% CAGR versus KR at 2.33%.
Does COST or KR pay a bigger dividend?
COST yields 0.61% and KR yields 2.55% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is COST or KR more profitable?
COST runs the higher net margin — COST at 3.01% versus KR at 0.71%.
How have COST and KR total returns compared?
Over the past 10 years, COST delivered 20.56% and KR delivered 8.24% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.