Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) vs The Kroger Co. (KR)

COST and KR are evenly matched — 8 metrics each of 16.

A side-by-side comparison of Costco Wholesale Corporation and The Kroger Co. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — COST vs KR

growth of $100 · last 30y
COST +9597.4%KR +1237.0%COST compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
101001k10k100kStart $100200120062011201620212026$9,697$1,337
COST KR

COST vs KR: by the numbers

  • COST is the larger company ($435.65B vs $39.90B market cap).
  • KR trades at the lower earnings multiple (42.02 vs 49.41 P/E).
  • COST converts more revenue to profit (3.01% vs 0.69% net margin).
  • COST grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.48% vs 2.19% CAGR).
  • KR pays the higher dividend yield (2.16% vs 0.55%).

Which is better, COST or KR?

Metric tally: COST 8 · KR 8

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueKR(lower P/E)
GrowthCOST(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeKR(higher dividend yield)
QualityCOST(higher ROIC)

Valuation

MetricCOSTKR
P/E ratio49.4142.02
Forward P/E43.4011.53
P/S ratio1.490.28
P/B ratio13.036.89
PEG ratio5.23
EV / EBITDA29.4310.80
FCF yield2.02%8.64%

Profitability

MetricCOSTKR
Gross margin12.88%23.30%
Operating margin3.82%1.28%
Net margin3.01%0.69%
ROE26.38%17.14%
ROIC19.44%4.70%

Dividends

MetricCOSTKR
Dividend yield0.55%2.16%
Payout ratio29.44%89.74%

Growth (annualized)

MetricCOSTKR
Revenue CAGR (5Y)9.48%2.19%
EPS CAGR (5Y)15.04%-13.96%
FCF CAGR (5Y)4.95%-2.23%
Total return CAGR (5Y)21.56%13.20%

Frequently asked

Which is better, COST or KR?
It depends on your goal. value: KR (lower P/E); growth: COST (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: KR (higher dividend yield); quality: COST (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
Is COST or KR cheaper?
On trailing earnings, KR is cheaper: COST trades at a 49.41 P/E and KR at 42.02.
Which has grown faster, COST or KR?
Over the past five years, COST grew revenue faster — COST at a 9.48% CAGR versus KR at 2.19%.
Does COST or KR pay a bigger dividend?
COST yields 0.55% and KR yields 2.16% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is COST or KR more profitable?
COST runs the higher net margin — COST at 3.01% versus KR at 0.69%.
Which has been the better investment, COST or KR?
Over the past 10-year, COST delivered the higher annualized total return — COST at 21.26% versus KR at 8.00%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.