Genuine Parts Company (GPC) vs The Procter & Gamble Company (PG)
A side-by-side comparison of Genuine Parts Company and The Procter & Gamble Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: GPC is classified in Consumer Cyclical; PG is classified in Consumer Defensive. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
GPC
Genuine Parts Company
$132.81Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 14, 2026, 3:55 PM EDT
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
$146.19Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 14, 2026, 3:55 PM EDT
Total return — GPC vs PG
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yGPC +80.0% (+6.1%/yr)PG +116.8% (+8.0%/yr)PG compounded faster over this window
GPC PG
GPC vs PG: by the numbers
- •PG is the larger company ($347.52B vs $18.31B market cap).
- •PG trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (22.08 vs 553.35 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •PG converts more revenue to profit (18.44% vs 0.13% net margin).
- •GPC grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.01% vs 2.72% CAGR).
- •GPC pays the higher dividend yield (3.15% vs 2.95%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | GPC | PG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 553.35 | 22.08 |
| Forward P/E | N/A | 20.96 |
| P/S ratio | 0.73 | 3.99 |
| P/B ratio | 4.05 | 6.40 |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.54 | 16.27 |
| FCF yield | 4.15% | 4.58% |
Profitability
| Metric | GPC | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 36.22% | 50.18% |
| Operating margin | 4.01% | 22.69% |
| Net margin | 0.13% | 18.44% |
| ROE | 0.72% | 29.54% |
| ROIC | 8.03% | 15.78% |
Dividends
| Metric | GPC | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.15% | 2.95% |
| Payout ratio | 1757.29% | 64.81% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | GPC | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 7.01% | 2.72% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 3.48% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -13.88% | 0.42% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 5.45% | 2.76% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, GPC or PG?
- PG has the lower trailing P/E: GPC trades at 553.35 and PG at 22.08. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, GPC or PG?
- Over the past five years, GPC grew revenue faster — GPC at a 7.01% CAGR versus PG at 2.72%.
- Does GPC or PG pay a bigger dividend?
- GPC yields 3.15% and PG yields 2.95% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is GPC or PG more profitable?
- PG runs the higher net margin — GPC at 0.13% versus PG at 18.44%.
- How have GPC and PG total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, GPC delivered 6.34% and PG delivered 8.26% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Genuine Parts P/E ratioProcter & Gamble P/E ratioGenuine Parts dividend yieldProcter & Gamble dividend yieldGenuine Parts ROEProcter & Gamble ROEGenuine Parts operating marginProcter & Gamble operating marginGenuine Parts revenue growthProcter & Gamble revenue growthGenuine Parts free cash flowProcter & Gamble free cash flow
Genuine Parts & Procter & Gamble appear in these rankings
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.