Which has the lower trailing P/E, GPC or KMB?

KMB has the lower trailing P/E: GPC trades at 532.08 and KMB at 17.49. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, GPC or KMB?

Over the past five years, GPC grew revenue faster — GPC at a 7.01% CAGR versus KMB at -2.61%.

Does GPC or KMB pay a bigger dividend?

GPC yields 3.28% and KMB yields 4.56% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is GPC or KMB more profitable?

KMB runs the higher net margin — GPC at 0.13% versus KMB at 12.81%.

How have GPC and KMB total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, GPC delivered 5.35% and KMB delivered 2.16% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Genuine Parts Company (GPC) vs Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB)

A side-by-side comparison of Genuine Parts Company and Kimberly-Clark Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Different business models: GPC is classified in Consumer Cyclical; KMB is classified in Consumer Defensive. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

GPC

Genuine Parts Company

$17.88B

$129.71Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

KMB

Kimberly-Clark Corporation

$37.54B

$113.09Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — GPC vs KMB

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30y

GPC +1087.3%KMB +678.6%GPC compounded faster

GPC KMB

GPC vs KMB: by the numbers

•KMB is the larger company ($37.54B vs $17.88B market cap).
•KMB trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (17.49 vs 532.08 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•KMB converts more revenue to profit (12.81% vs 0.13% net margin).
•GPC grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.01% vs -2.61% CAGR).
•KMB pays the higher dividend yield (4.56% vs 3.28%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	GPC	KMB
P/E ratio	532.08	17.49
Forward P/E	N/A	14.81
P/S ratio	0.70	2.25
P/B ratio	3.89	20.67
EV / EBITDA	15.10	15.38
FCF yield	4.31%	6.94%

Profitability

Metric	GPC	KMB
Gross margin	36.22%	35.86%
Operating margin	4.01%	13.27%
Net margin	0.13%	12.81%
ROE	0.72%	117.98%
ROIC	9.87%	17.41%

Dividends

Metric	GPC	KMB
Dividend yield	3.28%	4.56%
Payout ratio	890.43%	83.55%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	GPC	KMB
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	7.01%	-2.61%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	-2.50%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-13.88%	-8.19%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	2.71%	0.34%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, GPC or KMB?: KMB has the lower trailing P/E: GPC trades at 532.08 and KMB at 17.49. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, GPC or KMB?: Over the past five years, GPC grew revenue faster — GPC at a 7.01% CAGR versus KMB at -2.61%.
Does GPC or KMB pay a bigger dividend?: GPC yields 3.28% and KMB yields 4.56% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is GPC or KMB more profitable?: KMB runs the higher net margin — GPC at 0.13% versus KMB at 12.81%.
How have GPC and KMB total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, GPC delivered 5.35% and KMB delivered 2.16% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full GPC analysis Full KMB analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Genuine Parts P/E ratio Kimberly-Clark P/E ratio Genuine Parts dividend yield Kimberly-Clark dividend yield Genuine Parts ROE Kimberly-Clark ROE Genuine Parts operating margin Kimberly-Clark operating margin Genuine Parts revenue growth Kimberly-Clark revenue growth Genuine Parts free cash flow Kimberly-Clark free cash flow

Genuine Parts & Kimberly-Clark appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks 25+ Year Dividend Growers Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.