Genuine Parts Company (GPC) vs Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB)
A side-by-side comparison of Genuine Parts Company and Kimberly-Clark Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: GPC is classified in Consumer Cyclical; KMB is classified in Consumer Defensive. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
GPC
Genuine Parts Company
$133.19Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 14, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
$99.09Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 14, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — GPC vs KMB
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yGPC +80.0% (+6.1%/yr)KMB +15.1% (+1.4%/yr)GPC compounded faster over this window
GPC KMB
GPC vs KMB: by the numbers
- •KMB is the larger company ($32.89B vs $18.36B market cap).
- •KMB trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (16.85 vs 554.94 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •KMB converts more revenue to profit (11.80% vs 0.13% net margin).
- •GPC grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.01% vs -2.69% CAGR).
- •KMB pays the higher dividend yield (5.20% vs 3.15%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | GPC | KMB |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 554.94 | 16.85 |
| Forward P/E | N/A | 13.36 |
| P/S ratio | 0.73 | 1.99 |
| P/B ratio | 4.06 | 18.80 |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.57 | 14.56 |
| FCF yield | 4.14% | 5.35% |
Profitability
| Metric | GPC | KMB |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 36.22% | 36.69% |
| Operating margin | 4.01% | 12.38% |
| Net margin | 0.13% | 11.80% |
| ROE | 0.72% | 111.71% |
| ROIC | 8.03% | 12.46% |
Dividends
| Metric | GPC | KMB |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.15% | 5.20% |
| Payout ratio | 1757.29% | 86.73% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | GPC | KMB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 7.01% | -2.69% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | N/A | -2.50% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -13.88% | -8.19% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 5.45% | -2.75% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, GPC or KMB?
- KMB has the lower trailing P/E: GPC trades at 554.94 and KMB at 16.85. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, GPC or KMB?
- Over the past five years, GPC grew revenue faster — GPC at a 7.01% CAGR versus KMB at -2.69%.
- Does GPC or KMB pay a bigger dividend?
- GPC yields 3.15% and KMB yields 5.20% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is GPC or KMB more profitable?
- KMB runs the higher net margin — GPC at 0.13% versus KMB at 11.80%.
- How have GPC and KMB total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, GPC delivered 6.34% and KMB delivered 1.32% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Genuine Parts P/E ratioKimberly-Clark P/E ratioGenuine Parts dividend yieldKimberly-Clark dividend yieldGenuine Parts ROEKimberly-Clark ROEGenuine Parts operating marginKimberly-Clark operating marginGenuine Parts revenue growthKimberly-Clark revenue growthGenuine Parts free cash flowKimberly-Clark free cash flow
Genuine Parts & Kimberly-Clark appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.