Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) vs Genuine Parts Company (GPC)
A side-by-side comparison of Colgate-Palmolive Company and Genuine Parts Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: CL is classified in Consumer Defensive; GPC is classified in Consumer Cyclical. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
CL
Colgate-Palmolive Company
$87.91Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 14, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT
GPC
Genuine Parts Company
$133.19Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 14, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT
Total return — CL vs GPC
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCL +51.6% (+4.2%/yr)GPC +81.7% (+6.2%/yr)GPC compounded faster over this window
CL GPC
CL vs GPC: by the numbers
- •CL is the larger company ($70.34B vs $18.36B market cap).
- •CL trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (34.83 vs 554.94 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •CL converts more revenue to profit (9.68% vs 0.13% net margin).
- •GPC grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.01% vs 4.26% CAGR).
- •GPC pays the higher dividend yield (3.15% vs 2.42%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CL | GPC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 34.83 | 554.94 |
| Forward P/E | 22.73 | N/A |
| P/S ratio | 3.34 | 0.73 |
| P/B ratio | 298.05 | 4.06 |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.40 | 15.57 |
| FCF yield | 5.48% | 4.14% |
Profitability
| Metric | CL | GPC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 60.42% | 36.22% |
| Operating margin | 20.65% | 4.01% |
| Net margin | 9.68% | 0.13% |
| ROE | 863.14% | 0.72% |
| ROIC | 29.91% | 8.03% |
Dividends
| Metric | CL | GPC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.42% | 3.15% |
| Payout ratio | 83.20% | 1757.29% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CL | GPC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 4.26% | 7.01% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -3.47% | N/A |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 7.70% | -13.88% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 4.87% | 5.45% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CL or GPC?
- CL has the lower trailing P/E: CL trades at 34.83 and GPC at 554.94. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CL or GPC?
- Over the past five years, GPC grew revenue faster — CL at a 4.26% CAGR versus GPC at 7.01%.
- Does CL or GPC pay a bigger dividend?
- CL yields 2.42% and GPC yields 3.15% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CL or GPC more profitable?
- CL runs the higher net margin — CL at 9.68% versus GPC at 0.13%.
- How have CL and GPC total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CL delivered 4.48% and GPC delivered 6.34% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Colgate-Palmolive P/E ratioGenuine Parts P/E ratioColgate-Palmolive dividend yieldGenuine Parts dividend yieldColgate-Palmolive ROEGenuine Parts ROEColgate-Palmolive operating marginGenuine Parts operating marginColgate-Palmolive revenue growthGenuine Parts revenue growthColgate-Palmolive free cash flowGenuine Parts free cash flow
Colgate-Palmolive & Genuine Parts appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.