Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) vs The Procter & Gamble Company (PG)
A side-by-side comparison of Emerson Electric Co. and The Procter & Gamble Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: EMR is classified in Industrials; PG is classified in Consumer Defensive. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
EMR
Emerson Electric Co.
$148.39IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 14, 2026, 3:55 PM EDT
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
$146.19Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 14, 2026, 3:55 PM EDT
Total return — EMR vs PG
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yEMR +267.7% (+13.9%/yr)PG +116.8% (+8.0%/yr)EMR compounded faster over this window
EMR PG
EMR vs PG: by the numbers
- •PG is the larger company ($347.52B vs $83.11B market cap).
- •PG trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (22.08 vs 32.47 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •PG converts more revenue to profit (18.44% vs 13.83% net margin).
- •PG grew revenue faster over the past five years (2.72% vs 0.87% CAGR).
- •PG pays the higher dividend yield (2.95% vs 1.46%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | EMR | PG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 32.47 | 22.08 |
| Forward P/E | 22.62 | 20.96 |
| P/S ratio | 4.46 | 3.99 |
| P/B ratio | 4.08 | 6.40 |
| EV / EBITDA | 18.73 | 16.27 |
| FCF yield | 4.16% | 4.58% |
Profitability
| Metric | EMR | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 53.16% | 50.18% |
| Operating margin | 20.11% | 22.69% |
| Net margin | 13.83% | 18.44% |
| ROE | 12.65% | 29.54% |
| ROIC | 7.93% | 15.78% |
Dividends
| Metric | EMR | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.46% | 2.95% |
| Payout ratio | 48.58% | 64.81% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | EMR | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 0.87% | 2.72% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 4.54% | 3.48% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 0.41% | 0.42% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 10.92% | 2.76% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, EMR or PG?
- PG has the lower trailing P/E: EMR trades at 32.47 and PG at 22.08. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, EMR or PG?
- Over the past five years, PG grew revenue faster — EMR at a 0.87% CAGR versus PG at 2.72%.
- Does EMR or PG pay a bigger dividend?
- EMR yields 1.46% and PG yields 2.95% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is EMR or PG more profitable?
- PG runs the higher net margin — EMR at 13.83% versus PG at 18.44%.
- How have EMR and PG total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, EMR delivered 14.33% and PG delivered 8.26% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Emerson Electric P/E ratioProcter & Gamble P/E ratioEmerson Electric dividend yieldProcter & Gamble dividend yieldEmerson Electric ROEProcter & Gamble ROEEmerson Electric operating marginProcter & Gamble operating marginEmerson Electric revenue growthProcter & Gamble revenue growthEmerson Electric free cash flowProcter & Gamble free cash flow
Emerson Electric & Procter & Gamble appear in these rankings
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.