Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) vs The Procter & Gamble Company (PG)
A side-by-side comparison of Emerson Electric Co. and The Procter & Gamble Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: EMR is classified in Industrials; PG is classified in Consumer Defensive. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
EMR
Emerson Electric Co.
$151.81IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
$148.75Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — EMR vs PG
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30yEMR +1471.6%PG +1365.9%EMR compounded faster
EMR PG
EMR vs PG: by the numbers
- •PG is the larger company ($346.38B vs $85.03B market cap).
- •PG trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (21.73 vs 34.48 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •PG converts more revenue to profit (19.22% vs 13.35% net margin).
- •PG grew revenue faster over the past five years (2.98% vs 1.43% CAGR).
- •PG pays the higher dividend yield (2.87% vs 1.47%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | EMR | PG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 34.48 | 21.73 |
| Forward P/E | 22.95 | 21.62 |
| P/S ratio | 4.59 | 4.14 |
| P/B ratio | 4.14 | 6.59 |
| PEG ratio | 1.78 | 3.01 |
| EV / EBITDA | 18.76 | 16.53 |
| FCF yield | 3.71% | 4.18% |
Profitability
| Metric | EMR | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 52.66% | 50.33% |
| Operating margin | 19.96% | 23.24% |
| Net margin | 13.35% | 19.22% |
| ROE | 12.04% | 30.58% |
| ROIC | 7.26% | 16.47% |
Dividends
| Metric | EMR | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.47% | 2.87% |
| Payout ratio | 53.87% | 63.85% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | EMR | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 1.43% | 2.98% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 4.54% | 5.39% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 0.94% | -1.64% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 11.23% | 3.71% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, EMR or PG?
- PG has the lower trailing P/E: EMR trades at 34.48 and PG at 21.73. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, EMR or PG?
- Over the past five years, PG grew revenue faster — EMR at a 1.43% CAGR versus PG at 2.98%.
- Does EMR or PG pay a bigger dividend?
- EMR yields 1.47% and PG yields 2.87% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is EMR or PG more profitable?
- PG runs the higher net margin — EMR at 13.35% versus PG at 19.22%.
- How have EMR and PG total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, EMR delivered 13.28% and PG delivered 8.74% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Emerson Electric P/E ratioProcter & Gamble P/E ratioEmerson Electric dividend yieldProcter & Gamble dividend yieldEmerson Electric ROEProcter & Gamble ROEEmerson Electric operating marginProcter & Gamble operating marginEmerson Electric revenue growthProcter & Gamble revenue growthEmerson Electric free cash flowProcter & Gamble free cash flow
Emerson Electric & Procter & Gamble appear in these rankings
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.