Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) vs Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB)
A side-by-side comparison of Emerson Electric Co. and Kimberly-Clark Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: EMR is classified in Industrials; KMB is classified in Consumer Defensive. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
EMR
Emerson Electric Co.
$148.30IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 14, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
$99.09Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 14, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — EMR vs KMB
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yEMR +267.7% (+13.9%/yr)KMB +15.1% (+1.4%/yr)EMR compounded faster over this window
EMR KMB
EMR vs KMB: by the numbers
- •EMR is the larger company ($83.06B vs $32.89B market cap).
- •KMB trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (16.85 vs 32.45 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •EMR converts more revenue to profit (13.83% vs 11.80% net margin).
- •EMR grew revenue faster over the past five years (0.87% vs -2.69% CAGR).
- •KMB pays the higher dividend yield (5.20% vs 1.46%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | EMR | KMB |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 32.45 | 16.85 |
| Forward P/E | 22.61 | 13.36 |
| P/S ratio | 4.46 | 1.99 |
| P/B ratio | 4.08 | 18.80 |
| EV / EBITDA | 18.72 | 14.56 |
| FCF yield | 4.17% | 5.35% |
Profitability
| Metric | EMR | KMB |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 53.16% | 36.69% |
| Operating margin | 20.11% | 12.38% |
| Net margin | 13.83% | 11.80% |
| ROE | 12.65% | 111.71% |
| ROIC | 7.93% | 12.46% |
Dividends
| Metric | EMR | KMB |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.46% | 5.20% |
| Payout ratio | 48.58% | 86.73% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | EMR | KMB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 0.87% | -2.69% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 4.54% | -2.50% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 0.41% | -8.19% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 10.92% | -2.75% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, EMR or KMB?
- KMB has the lower trailing P/E: EMR trades at 32.45 and KMB at 16.85. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, EMR or KMB?
- Over the past five years, EMR grew revenue faster — EMR at a 0.87% CAGR versus KMB at -2.69%.
- Does EMR or KMB pay a bigger dividend?
- EMR yields 1.46% and KMB yields 5.20% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is EMR or KMB more profitable?
- EMR runs the higher net margin — EMR at 13.83% versus KMB at 11.80%.
- How have EMR and KMB total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, EMR delivered 14.33% and KMB delivered 1.32% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Emerson Electric P/E ratioKimberly-Clark P/E ratioEmerson Electric dividend yieldKimberly-Clark dividend yieldEmerson Electric ROEKimberly-Clark ROEEmerson Electric operating marginKimberly-Clark operating marginEmerson Electric revenue growthKimberly-Clark revenue growthEmerson Electric free cash flowKimberly-Clark free cash flow
Emerson Electric & Kimberly-Clark appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.