Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) vs Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB)
A side-by-side comparison of Emerson Electric Co. and Kimberly-Clark Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: EMR is classified in Industrials; KMB is classified in Consumer Defensive. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
EMR
Emerson Electric Co.
$151.81IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
$113.09Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — EMR vs KMB
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30yEMR +1508.2%KMB +717.2%EMR compounded faster
EMR KMB
EMR vs KMB: by the numbers
- •EMR is the larger company ($85.03B vs $37.54B market cap).
- •KMB trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (17.49 vs 34.48 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •EMR converts more revenue to profit (13.35% vs 12.81% net margin).
- •EMR grew revenue faster over the past five years (1.43% vs -2.61% CAGR).
- •KMB pays the higher dividend yield (4.56% vs 1.47%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | EMR | KMB |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 34.48 | 17.49 |
| Forward P/E | 22.95 | 14.81 |
| P/S ratio | 4.59 | 2.25 |
| P/B ratio | 4.14 | 20.67 |
| PEG ratio | 1.78 | N/A |
| EV / EBITDA | 18.76 | 15.38 |
| FCF yield | 3.71% | 6.94% |
Profitability
| Metric | EMR | KMB |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 52.66% | 35.86% |
| Operating margin | 19.96% | 13.27% |
| Net margin | 13.35% | 12.81% |
| ROE | 12.04% | 117.98% |
| ROIC | 7.26% | 17.41% |
Dividends
| Metric | EMR | KMB |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.47% | 4.56% |
| Payout ratio | 53.87% | 83.55% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | EMR | KMB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 1.43% | -2.61% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 4.54% | -2.50% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 0.94% | -8.19% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 11.23% | 0.34% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, EMR or KMB?
- KMB has the lower trailing P/E: EMR trades at 34.48 and KMB at 17.49. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, EMR or KMB?
- Over the past five years, EMR grew revenue faster — EMR at a 1.43% CAGR versus KMB at -2.61%.
- Does EMR or KMB pay a bigger dividend?
- EMR yields 1.47% and KMB yields 4.56% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is EMR or KMB more profitable?
- EMR runs the higher net margin — EMR at 13.35% versus KMB at 12.81%.
- How have EMR and KMB total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, EMR delivered 13.28% and KMB delivered 2.16% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Emerson Electric P/E ratioKimberly-Clark P/E ratioEmerson Electric dividend yieldKimberly-Clark dividend yieldEmerson Electric ROEKimberly-Clark ROEEmerson Electric operating marginKimberly-Clark operating marginEmerson Electric revenue growthKimberly-Clark revenue growthEmerson Electric free cash flowKimberly-Clark free cash flow
Emerson Electric & Kimberly-Clark appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.