Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) vs Emerson Electric Co. (EMR)
A side-by-side comparison of Colgate-Palmolive Company and Emerson Electric Co. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: CL is classified in Consumer Defensive; EMR is classified in Industrials. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
CL
Colgate-Palmolive Company
$92.73Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
EMR
Emerson Electric Co.
$151.81IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CL vs EMR
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30yCL +1694.5%EMR +1508.2%CL compounded faster
CL EMR
CL vs EMR: by the numbers
- •EMR is the larger company ($85.03B vs $74.20B market cap).
- •EMR trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (34.48 vs 35.73 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •EMR converts more revenue to profit (13.35% vs 10.04% net margin).
- •CL grew revenue faster over the past five years (4.46% vs 1.43% CAGR).
- •CL pays the higher dividend yield (2.27% vs 1.47%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CL | EMR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 35.73 | 34.48 |
| Forward P/E | 24.16 | 22.95 |
| P/S ratio | 3.56 | 4.59 |
| P/B ratio | 510.71 | 4.14 |
| PEG ratio | N/A | 1.78 |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.98 | 18.76 |
| FCF yield | 5.09% | 3.71% |
Profitability
| Metric | CL | EMR |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 60.06% | 52.66% |
| Operating margin | 21.21% | 19.96% |
| Net margin | 10.04% | 13.35% |
| ROE | 1439.31% | 12.04% |
| ROIC | 30.34% | 7.26% |
Dividends
| Metric | CL | EMR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.27% | 1.47% |
| Payout ratio | 79.17% | 53.87% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CL | EMR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 4.46% | 1.43% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -3.47% | 4.54% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 3.88% | 0.94% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 4.91% | 11.23% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CL or EMR?
- EMR has the lower trailing P/E: CL trades at 35.73 and EMR at 34.48. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CL or EMR?
- Over the past five years, CL grew revenue faster — CL at a 4.46% CAGR versus EMR at 1.43%.
- Does CL or EMR pay a bigger dividend?
- CL yields 2.27% and EMR yields 1.47% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CL or EMR more profitable?
- EMR runs the higher net margin — CL at 10.04% versus EMR at 13.35%.
- How have CL and EMR total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CL delivered 4.96% and EMR delivered 13.28% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Colgate-Palmolive P/E ratioEmerson Electric P/E ratioColgate-Palmolive dividend yieldEmerson Electric dividend yieldColgate-Palmolive ROEEmerson Electric ROEColgate-Palmolive operating marginEmerson Electric operating marginColgate-Palmolive revenue growthEmerson Electric revenue growthColgate-Palmolive free cash flowEmerson Electric free cash flow
Colgate-Palmolive & Emerson Electric appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.