Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) vs The Coca-Cola Company (KO)

A side-by-side comparison of Costco Wholesale Corporation and The Coca-Cola Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total returnCOST vs KO

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30y
COST +11175.1%KO +665.6%COST compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
101001k10k100kStart $100200120062011201620212026$11,275$766
COST KO

COST vs KO: by the numbers

  • COST is the larger company ($428.66B vs $379.78B market cap).
  • KO trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (26.44 vs 47.87 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
  • KO converts more revenue to profit (27.80% vs 3.01% net margin).
  • COST grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.48% vs 8.07% CAGR).
  • KO pays the higher dividend yield (2.47% vs 0.56%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricCOSTKO
P/E ratio47.8726.44
Forward P/E46.3325.72
P/S ratio1.447.36
P/B ratio12.6210.78
PEG ratio5.230.98
EV / EBITDA29.8925.53
FCF yield2.08%3.46%

Profitability

MetricCOSTKO
Gross margin12.88%61.74%
Operating margin3.82%29.34%
Net margin3.01%27.80%
ROE26.38%40.74%
ROIC19.44%13.00%

Dividends

MetricCOSTKO
Dividend yield0.56%2.47%
Payout ratio29.44%68.20%

Growth (annualized)

MetricCOSTKO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)9.48%8.07%
EPS CAGR (5Y)15.04%11.12%
FCF CAGR (5Y)4.95%-9.38%
Total return CAGR (5Y)18.31%11.23%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, COST or KO?
KO has the lower trailing P/E: COST trades at 47.87 and KO at 26.44. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, COST or KO?
Over the past five years, COST grew revenue faster — COST at a 9.48% CAGR versus KO at 8.07%.
Does COST or KO pay a bigger dividend?
COST yields 0.56% and KO yields 2.47% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is COST or KO more profitable?
KO runs the higher net margin — COST at 3.01% versus KO at 27.80%.
How have COST and KO total returns compared?
Over the past 10 years, COST delivered 20.06% and KO delivered 10.23% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.