Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) vs The Coca-Cola Company (KO)

A side-by-side comparison of Costco Wholesale Corporation and The Coca-Cola Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total returnCOST vs KO

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y
COST +544.2% (+20.5%/yr)KO +182.8% (+11.0%/yr)COST compounded faster over this window
200400600800Start $10020182020202220242026$644$283
COST KO

COST vs KO: by the numbers

  • COST is the larger company ($401.25B vs $379.87B market cap).
  • KO trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (26.51 vs 45.51 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
  • KO converts more revenue to profit (28.56% vs 3.01% net margin).
  • COST grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.48% vs 6.60% CAGR).
  • KO pays the higher dividend yield (2.37% vs 0.61%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricCOSTKO
P/E ratio45.5126.51
Forward P/E39.9226.71
P/S ratio1.377.58
P/B ratio11.9710.51
EV / EBITDA28.3225.84
FCF yield2.19%3.76%

Profitability

MetricCOSTKO
Gross margin12.88%61.89%
Operating margin3.82%29.63%
Net margin3.01%28.56%
ROE26.38%39.60%
ROIC19.01%13.91%

Dividends

MetricCOSTKO
Dividend yield0.61%2.37%
Payout ratio27.87%62.46%

Growth (annualized)

MetricCOSTKO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)9.48%6.60%
EPS CAGR (5Y)15.04%11.12%
FCF CAGR (5Y)4.95%-9.38%
Total return CAGR (5Y)14.89%12.87%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, COST or KO?
KO has the lower trailing P/E: COST trades at 45.51 and KO at 26.51. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, COST or KO?
Over the past five years, COST grew revenue faster — COST at a 9.48% CAGR versus KO at 6.60%.
Does COST or KO pay a bigger dividend?
COST yields 0.61% and KO yields 2.37% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is COST or KO more profitable?
KO runs the higher net margin — COST at 3.01% versus KO at 28.56%.
How have COST and KO total returns compared?
Over the past 10 years, COST delivered 20.56% and KO delivered 11.00% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.