Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) vs PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP)

A side-by-side comparison of Costco Wholesale Corporation and PepsiCo, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total returnCOST vs PEP

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y
COST +537.6% (+20.4%/yr)PEP +78.1% (+5.9%/yr)COST compounded faster over this window
200400600Start $10020182020202220242026$638$178
COST PEP

COST vs PEP: by the numbers

  • COST is the larger company ($401.25B vs $186.21B market cap).
  • PEP trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (17.87 vs 45.51 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
  • PEP converts more revenue to profit (10.82% vs 3.01% net margin).
  • COST grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.48% vs 5.37% CAGR).
  • PEP pays the higher dividend yield (4.25% vs 0.61%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricCOSTPEP
P/E ratio45.5117.87
Forward P/E39.9215.94
P/S ratio1.371.92
P/B ratio11.978.43
EV / EBITDA28.3212.16
FCF yield2.19%4.98%

Profitability

MetricCOSTPEP
Gross margin12.88%53.96%
Operating margin3.82%14.96%
Net margin3.01%10.82%
ROE26.38%47.45%
ROIC19.01%13.22%

Dividends

MetricCOSTPEP
Dividend yield0.61%4.25%
Payout ratio27.87%76.08%

Growth (annualized)

MetricCOSTPEP
Revenue CAGR (5Y)9.48%5.37%
EPS CAGR (5Y)15.04%3.25%
FCF CAGR (5Y)4.95%5.40%
Total return CAGR (5Y)14.89%0.63%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, COST or PEP?
PEP has the lower trailing P/E: COST trades at 45.51 and PEP at 17.87. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, COST or PEP?
Over the past five years, COST grew revenue faster — COST at a 9.48% CAGR versus PEP at 5.37%.
Does COST or PEP pay a bigger dividend?
COST yields 0.61% and PEP yields 4.25% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is COST or PEP more profitable?
PEP runs the higher net margin — COST at 3.01% versus PEP at 10.82%.
How have COST and PEP total returns compared?
Over the past 10 years, COST delivered 20.56% and PEP delivered 6.00% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.