Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) vs PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP)

A side-by-side comparison of Costco Wholesale Corporation and PepsiCo, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total returnCOST vs PEP

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30y
COST +11175.1%PEP +819.5%COST compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
101001k10k100kStart $100200120062011201620212026$11,275$919
COST PEP

COST vs PEP: by the numbers

  • COST is the larger company ($428.66B vs $195.15B market cap).
  • PEP trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (18.32 vs 47.87 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
  • PEP converts more revenue to profit (10.82% vs 3.01% net margin).
  • COST grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.48% vs 5.37% CAGR).
  • PEP pays the higher dividend yield (4.11% vs 0.56%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricCOSTPEP
P/E ratio47.8718.32
Forward P/E46.3316.34
P/S ratio1.441.97
P/B ratio12.628.66
PEG ratio5.237.63
EV / EBITDA29.8912.43
FCF yield2.08%4.85%

Profitability

MetricCOSTPEP
Gross margin12.88%53.96%
Operating margin3.82%14.96%
Net margin3.01%10.82%
ROE26.38%47.45%
ROIC19.44%13.29%

Dividends

MetricCOSTPEP
Dividend yield0.56%4.11%
Payout ratio29.44%95.32%

Growth (annualized)

MetricCOSTPEP
Revenue CAGR (5Y)9.48%5.37%
EPS CAGR (5Y)15.04%2.40%
FCF CAGR (5Y)4.95%5.40%
Total return CAGR (5Y)18.31%0.72%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, COST or PEP?
PEP has the lower trailing P/E: COST trades at 47.87 and PEP at 18.32. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, COST or PEP?
Over the past five years, COST grew revenue faster — COST at a 9.48% CAGR versus PEP at 5.37%.
Does COST or PEP pay a bigger dividend?
COST yields 0.56% and PEP yields 4.11% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is COST or PEP more profitable?
PEP runs the higher net margin — COST at 3.01% versus PEP at 10.82%.
How have COST and PEP total returns compared?
Over the past 10 years, COST delivered 20.06% and PEP delivered 5.85% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.