Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) vs Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ)

STZ leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Costco Wholesale Corporation and Constellation Brands, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Not enough overlapping price history to compare COST and STZ.

COST vs STZ: by the numbers

  • COST is the larger company ($435.65B vs $25.47B market cap).
  • STZ trades at the lower earnings multiple (15.49 vs 49.41 P/E).
  • STZ converts more revenue to profit (18.46% vs 3.01% net margin).
  • COST grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.48% vs 1.19% CAGR).
  • STZ pays the higher dividend yield (2.75% vs 0.55%).

Which is better, COST or STZ?

Metric tally: COST 7 · STZ 9

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueSTZ(lower P/E)
GrowthCOST(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeSTZ(higher dividend yield)
QualityCOST(higher ROIC)

Valuation

MetricCOSTSTZ
P/E ratio49.4115.49
Forward P/E43.4011.90
P/S ratio1.492.82
P/B ratio13.033.19
PEG ratio5.23
EV / EBITDA29.4311.70
FCF yield2.02%6.95%

Profitability

MetricCOSTSTZ
Gross margin12.88%51.67%
Operating margin3.82%31.33%
Net margin3.01%18.46%
ROE26.38%20.87%
ROIC19.44%10.48%

Dividends

MetricCOSTSTZ
Dividend yield0.55%2.75%
Payout ratio29.44%42.52%

Growth (annualized)

MetricCOSTSTZ
Revenue CAGR (5Y)9.48%1.19%
EPS CAGR (5Y)15.04%-1.59%
FCF CAGR (5Y)4.95%-1.57%
Total return CAGR (5Y)21.56%-7.36%

Frequently asked

Which is better, COST or STZ?
It depends on your goal. value: STZ (lower P/E); growth: COST (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: STZ (higher dividend yield); quality: COST (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, STZ leads 9 to 7.
Is COST or STZ cheaper?
On trailing earnings, STZ is cheaper: COST trades at a 49.41 P/E and STZ at 15.49.
Which has grown faster, COST or STZ?
Over the past five years, COST grew revenue faster — COST at a 9.48% CAGR versus STZ at 1.19%.
Does COST or STZ pay a bigger dividend?
COST yields 0.55% and STZ yields 2.75% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is COST or STZ more profitable?
STZ runs the higher net margin — COST at 3.01% versus STZ at 18.46%.
Which has been the better investment, COST or STZ?
Over the past 10-year, COST delivered the higher annualized total return — COST at 21.26% versus STZ at 1.25%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.