Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) vs Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ)
STZ leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Costco Wholesale Corporation and Constellation Brands, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
$982.35Consumer Defensive
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
$148.51Consumer Defensive
Not enough overlapping price history to compare COST and STZ.
COST vs STZ: by the numbers
- •COST is the larger company ($435.65B vs $25.47B market cap).
- •STZ trades at the lower earnings multiple (15.49 vs 49.41 P/E).
- •STZ converts more revenue to profit (18.46% vs 3.01% net margin).
- •COST grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.48% vs 1.19% CAGR).
- •STZ pays the higher dividend yield (2.75% vs 0.55%).
Which is better, COST or STZ?
Metric tally: COST 7 · STZ 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueSTZ(lower P/E)
GrowthCOST(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeSTZ(higher dividend yield)
QualityCOST(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | COST | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 49.41 | 15.49● |
| Forward P/E | 43.40 | 11.90● |
| P/S ratio | 1.49● | 2.82 |
| P/B ratio | 13.03 | 3.19● |
| PEG ratio | 5.23 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 29.43 | 11.70● |
| FCF yield | 2.02% | 6.95%● |
Profitability
| Metric | COST | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 12.88% | 51.67%● |
| Operating margin | 3.82% | 31.33%● |
| Net margin | 3.01% | 18.46%● |
| ROE | 26.38%● | 20.87% |
| ROIC | 19.44%● | 10.48% |
Dividends
| Metric | COST | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | 2.75%● |
| Payout ratio | 29.44% | 42.52% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | COST | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.48%● | 1.19% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 15.04%● | -1.59% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 4.95%● | -1.57% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 21.56%● | -7.36% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, COST or STZ?
- It depends on your goal. value: STZ (lower P/E); growth: COST (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: STZ (higher dividend yield); quality: COST (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, STZ leads 9 to 7.
- Is COST or STZ cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, STZ is cheaper: COST trades at a 49.41 P/E and STZ at 15.49.
- Which has grown faster, COST or STZ?
- Over the past five years, COST grew revenue faster — COST at a 9.48% CAGR versus STZ at 1.19%.
- Does COST or STZ pay a bigger dividend?
- COST yields 0.55% and STZ yields 2.75% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is COST or STZ more profitable?
- STZ runs the higher net margin — COST at 3.01% versus STZ at 18.46%.
- Which has been the better investment, COST or STZ?
- Over the past 10-year, COST delivered the higher annualized total return — COST at 21.26% versus STZ at 1.25%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Costco Wholesale P/E ratioConstellation Brands P/E ratioCostco Wholesale dividend yieldConstellation Brands dividend yieldCostco Wholesale ROEConstellation Brands ROECostco Wholesale operating marginConstellation Brands operating marginCostco Wholesale revenue growthConstellation Brands revenue growthCostco Wholesale free cash flowConstellation Brands free cash flow
Costco Wholesale & Constellation Brands appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.