Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) vs Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ)
A side-by-side comparison of Costco Wholesale Corporation and Constellation Brands, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
$904.77Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
$122.45Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — COST vs STZ
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCOST +537.6% (+20.4%/yr)STZ -13.2% (-1.4%/yr)COST compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
COST STZ
COST vs STZ: by the numbers
- •COST is the larger company ($401.25B vs $20.91B market cap).
- •STZ trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (11.68 vs 45.51 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •STZ converts more revenue to profit (20.14% vs 3.01% net margin).
- •COST grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.48% vs 0.86% CAGR).
- •STZ pays the higher dividend yield (3.37% vs 0.61%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | COST | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 45.51 | 11.68 |
| Forward P/E | 39.92 | 10.38 |
| P/S ratio | 1.37 | 2.31 |
| P/B ratio | 11.97 | 2.53 |
| EV / EBITDA | 28.32 | 9.44 |
| FCF yield | 2.19% | 8.77% |
Profitability
| Metric | COST | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 12.88% | 52.62% |
| Operating margin | 3.82% | 32.14% |
| Net margin | 3.01% | 20.14% |
| ROE | 26.38% | 22.10% |
| ROIC | 19.01% | 10.85% |
Dividends
| Metric | COST | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.61% | 3.37% |
| Payout ratio | 27.87% | 39.12% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | COST | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.48% | 0.86% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 15.04% | -1.59% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 4.95% | -1.73% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 14.89% | -9.18% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, COST or STZ?
- STZ has the lower trailing P/E: COST trades at 45.51 and STZ at 11.68. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, COST or STZ?
- Over the past five years, COST grew revenue faster — COST at a 9.48% CAGR versus STZ at 0.86%.
- Does COST or STZ pay a bigger dividend?
- COST yields 0.61% and STZ yields 3.37% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is COST or STZ more profitable?
- STZ runs the higher net margin — COST at 3.01% versus STZ at 20.14%.
- How have COST and STZ total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, COST delivered 20.56% and STZ delivered -1.27% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Costco Wholesale P/E ratioConstellation Brands P/E ratioCostco Wholesale dividend yieldConstellation Brands dividend yieldCostco Wholesale ROEConstellation Brands ROECostco Wholesale operating marginConstellation Brands operating marginCostco Wholesale revenue growthConstellation Brands revenue growthCostco Wholesale free cash flowConstellation Brands free cash flow
Costco Wholesale & Constellation Brands appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.