Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) vs NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)
NVDA leads on 14 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Applied Materials, Inc. and NVIDIA Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — AMAT vs NVDA
growth of $100 · last 27yAMAT +4052.6%NVDA +500157.2%NVDA compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
AMAT NVDA
AMAT vs NVDA: by the numbers
- •NVDA is the larger company ($4.97T vs $450.37B market cap).
- •NVDA trades at the lower earnings multiple (31.42 vs 53.31 P/E).
- •NVDA converts more revenue to profit (62.97% vs 29.31% net margin).
- •NVDA grew revenue faster over the past five years (68.23% vs 9.33% CAGR).
- •AMAT pays the higher dividend yield (0.34% vs 0.01%).
Which is better, AMAT or NVDA?
Metric tally: AMAT 3 · NVDA 14It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueNVDA(lower P/E)
GrowthNVDA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityNVDA(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | AMAT | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 53.31 | 31.42● |
| Forward P/E | 46.38 | 16.44● |
| P/S ratio | 15.62● | 19.74 |
| P/B ratio | 18.96● | 25.60 |
| PEG ratio | 76.90 | 0.57● |
| EV / EBITDA | 41.89 | 25.96● |
| FCF yield | 1.32% | 2.38%● |
Profitability
| Metric | AMAT | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 74.15%● |
| Operating margin | 29.51% | 64.02%● |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 62.97%● |
| ROE | 35.58% | 81.65%● |
| ROIC | 21.96% | 62.88%● |
Dividends
| Metric | AMAT | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.34%● | 0.01% |
| Payout ratio | 21.93% | 0.61% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AMAT | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.33% | 68.23%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 17.13% | 85.78%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 9.02% | 85.52%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 34.01% | 63.05%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AMAT or NVDA?
- It depends on your goal. value: NVDA (lower P/E); growth: NVDA (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: NVDA (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, NVDA leads 14 to 3.
- Is AMAT or NVDA cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, NVDA is cheaper: AMAT trades at a 53.31 P/E and NVDA at 31.42.
- Which has grown faster, AMAT or NVDA?
- Over the past five years, NVDA grew revenue faster — AMAT at a 9.33% CAGR versus NVDA at 68.23%.
- Does AMAT or NVDA pay a bigger dividend?
- AMAT yields 0.34% and NVDA yields 0.01% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is AMAT or NVDA more profitable?
- NVDA runs the higher net margin — AMAT at 29.31% versus NVDA at 62.97%.
- Which has been the better investment, AMAT or NVDA?
- Over the past 10-year, NVDA delivered the higher annualized total return — AMAT at 38.64% versus NVDA at 68.06%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Applied Materials P/E ratioNVIDIA P/E ratioApplied Materials dividend yieldNVIDIA dividend yieldApplied Materials ROENVIDIA ROEApplied Materials operating marginNVIDIA operating marginApplied Materials revenue growthNVIDIA revenue growthApplied Materials free cash flowNVIDIA free cash flow
Applied Materials & NVIDIA appear in these rankings
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.