Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) vs NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)
A side-by-side comparison of Applied Materials, Inc. and NVIDIA Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
AMAT
Applied Materials, Inc.
$456.49TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
$218.29TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — AMAT vs NVDA
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yAMAT +1588.7% (+32.7%/yr)NVDA +14538.6% (+64.6%/yr)NVDA compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
AMAT NVDA
AMAT vs NVDA: by the numbers
- •NVDA is the larger company ($5.29T vs $362.43B market cap).
- •NVDA trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (27.60 vs 39.35 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •NVDA converts more revenue to profit (63.66% vs 30.05% net margin).
- •NVDA grew revenue faster over the past five years (69.34% vs 8.81% CAGR).
- •AMAT pays the higher dividend yield (0.54% vs 0.13%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | AMAT | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 39.35 | 27.60 |
| Forward P/E | 35.62 | 23.59 |
| P/S ratio | 11.75 | 17.45 |
| P/B ratio | 14.14 | 23.09 |
| EV / EBITDA | 36.53 | 26.35 |
| FCF yield | 1.55% | 2.40% |
Profitability
| Metric | AMAT | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 49.40% | 74.67% |
| Operating margin | 30.50% | 65.21% |
| Net margin | 30.05% | 63.66% |
| ROE | 36.16% | 84.23% |
| ROIC | 23.58% | 59.61% |
Dividends
| Metric | AMAT | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.54% | 0.13% |
| Payout ratio | 21.03% | 3.54% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AMAT | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 8.81% | 69.34% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 17.13% | 94.31% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 5.66% | 82.12% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 28.17% | 57.72% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, AMAT or NVDA?
- NVDA has the lower trailing P/E: AMAT trades at 39.35 and NVDA at 27.60. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, AMAT or NVDA?
- Over the past five years, NVDA grew revenue faster — AMAT at a 8.81% CAGR versus NVDA at 69.34%.
- Does AMAT or NVDA pay a bigger dividend?
- AMAT yields 0.54% and NVDA yields 0.13% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is AMAT or NVDA more profitable?
- NVDA runs the higher net margin — AMAT at 30.05% versus NVDA at 63.66%.
- How have AMAT and NVDA total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, AMAT delivered 33.13% and NVDA delivered 64.96% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Applied Materials P/E ratioNVIDIA P/E ratioApplied Materials dividend yieldNVIDIA dividend yieldApplied Materials ROENVIDIA ROEApplied Materials operating marginNVIDIA operating marginApplied Materials revenue growthNVIDIA revenue growthApplied Materials free cash flowNVIDIA free cash flow
Applied Materials & NVIDIA appear in these rankings
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 10, 2026.