Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) vs QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM)
QCOM leads on 11 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Applied Materials, Inc. and QUALCOMM Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
AMAT
Applied Materials, Inc.
$567.25Technology
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
$211.72Technology
Total return — AMAT vs QCOM
growth of $100 · last 30yAMAT +13247.1%QCOM +7150.7%AMAT compounded faster
AMAT QCOM
AMAT vs QCOM: by the numbers
- •AMAT is the larger company ($450.37B vs $223.15B market cap).
- •QCOM trades at the lower earnings multiple (22.72 vs 53.31 P/E).
- •AMAT converts more revenue to profit (29.31% vs 22.31% net margin).
- •AMAT grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.33% vs 8.63% CAGR).
- •QCOM pays the higher dividend yield (1.70% vs 0.34%).
Which is better, AMAT or QCOM?
Metric tally: AMAT 6 · QCOM 11It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueQCOM(lower P/E)
GrowthAMAT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeQCOM(higher dividend yield)
QualityAMAT(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | AMAT | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 53.31 | 22.72● |
| Forward P/E | 46.38 | 19.72● |
| P/S ratio | 15.62 | 5.10● |
| P/B ratio | 18.96 | 8.32● |
| PEG ratio | 76.90 | 3.96● |
| EV / EBITDA | 41.89 | 16.71● |
| FCF yield | 1.32% | 5.51%● |
Profitability
| Metric | AMAT | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 54.80%● |
| Operating margin | 29.51%● | 25.52% |
| Net margin | 29.31%● | 22.31% |
| ROE | 35.58% | 36.38%● |
| ROIC | 21.96%● | 13.15% |
Dividends
| Metric | AMAT | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.34% | 1.70%● |
| Payout ratio | 21.93% | 70.95% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AMAT | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.33%● | 8.63% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 17.13%● | 5.74% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 9.02% | 9.39%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 34.01%● | 11.87% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AMAT or QCOM?
- It depends on your goal. value: QCOM (lower P/E); growth: AMAT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: QCOM (higher dividend yield); quality: AMAT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, QCOM leads 11 to 6.
- Is AMAT or QCOM cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, QCOM is cheaper: AMAT trades at a 53.31 P/E and QCOM at 22.72.
- Which has grown faster, AMAT or QCOM?
- Over the past five years, AMAT grew revenue faster — AMAT at a 9.33% CAGR versus QCOM at 8.63%.
- Does AMAT or QCOM pay a bigger dividend?
- AMAT yields 0.34% and QCOM yields 1.70% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is AMAT or QCOM more profitable?
- AMAT runs the higher net margin — AMAT at 29.31% versus QCOM at 22.31%.
- Which has been the better investment, AMAT or QCOM?
- Over the past 10-year, AMAT delivered the higher annualized total return — AMAT at 38.64% versus QCOM at 17.83%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Applied Materials P/E ratioQUALCOMM P/E ratioApplied Materials dividend yieldQUALCOMM dividend yieldApplied Materials ROEQUALCOMM ROEApplied Materials operating marginQUALCOMM operating marginApplied Materials revenue growthQUALCOMM revenue growthApplied Materials free cash flowQUALCOMM free cash flow
Applied Materials & QUALCOMM appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.