Is AMAT or AVGO cheaper?

On trailing earnings, AMAT is cheaper: AMAT trades at a 53.31 P/E and AVGO at 63.68.

Which has grown faster, AMAT or AVGO?

Over the past five years, AVGO grew revenue faster — AMAT at a 9.33% CAGR versus AVGO at 24.17%.

Does AMAT or AVGO pay a bigger dividend?

AMAT yields 0.34% and AVGO yields 0.65% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is AMAT or AVGO more profitable?

AVGO runs the higher net margin — AMAT at 29.31% versus AVGO at 38.85%.

Which has been the better investment, AMAT or AVGO?

Over the past 10-year, AVGO delivered the higher annualized total return — AMAT at 38.64% versus AVGO at 40.78%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) vs Broadcom Inc. (AVGO)

AVGO leads on 11 of 17 compared metrics, though AMAT is the cheaper stock.

A side-by-side comparison of Applied Materials, Inc. and Broadcom Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

AMAT

Applied Materials, Inc.

Total return — AMAT vs AVGO

growth of $100 · last 17y

AMAT +4130.1%AVGO +23484.6%AVGO compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

AMAT AVGO

AMAT vs AVGO: by the numbers

•AVGO is the larger company ($1.82T vs $450.37B market cap).
•AMAT trades at the lower earnings multiple (53.31 vs 63.68 P/E).
•AVGO converts more revenue to profit (38.85% vs 29.31% net margin).
•AVGO grew revenue faster over the past five years (24.17% vs 9.33% CAGR).
•AVGO pays the higher dividend yield (0.65% vs 0.34%).

Which is better, AMAT or AVGO?

Metric tally: AMAT 6 · AVGO 11

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueAMAT(lower P/E)

GrowthAVGO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeAVGO(higher dividend yield)

QualityAMAT(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	AMAT	AVGO
P/E ratio	53.31●	63.68
Forward P/E	46.38	19.65●
P/S ratio	15.62●	24.69
P/B ratio	18.96●	21.24
PEG ratio	76.90	0.26●
EV / EBITDA	41.89●	45.41
FCF yield	1.32%	1.76%●

Profitability

Metric	AMAT	AVGO
Gross margin	48.96%	66.96%●
Operating margin	29.51%	43.66%●
Net margin	29.31%	38.85%●
ROE	35.58%●	33.43%
ROIC	21.96%●	16.36%

Dividends

Metric	AMAT	AVGO
Dividend yield	0.34%	0.65%●
Payout ratio	21.93%	50.51%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AMAT	AVGO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.33%	24.17%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	17.13%	49.36%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	9.02%	20.74%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	34.01%	55.05%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, AMAT or AVGO?: It depends on your goal. value: AMAT (lower P/E); growth: AVGO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: AVGO (higher dividend yield); quality: AMAT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, AVGO leads 11 to 6.
Is AMAT or AVGO cheaper?: On trailing earnings, AMAT is cheaper: AMAT trades at a 53.31 P/E and AVGO at 63.68.
Which has grown faster, AMAT or AVGO?: Over the past five years, AVGO grew revenue faster — AMAT at a 9.33% CAGR versus AVGO at 24.17%.
Does AMAT or AVGO pay a bigger dividend?: AMAT yields 0.34% and AVGO yields 0.65% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is AMAT or AVGO more profitable?: AVGO runs the higher net margin — AMAT at 29.31% versus AVGO at 38.85%.
Which has been the better investment, AMAT or AVGO?: Over the past 10-year, AVGO delivered the higher annualized total return — AMAT at 38.64% versus AVGO at 40.78%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AMAT analysis Full AVGO analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Applied Materials P/E ratio Broadcom P/E ratio Applied Materials dividend yield Broadcom dividend yield Applied Materials ROE Broadcom ROE Applied Materials operating margin Broadcom operating margin Applied Materials revenue growth Broadcom revenue growth Applied Materials free cash flow Broadcom free cash flow

Applied Materials & Broadcom appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.