Which has grown faster, AMAT or INTC?

Over the past five years, AMAT grew revenue faster — AMAT at a 8.81% CAGR versus INTC at -5.97%.

Does AMAT or INTC pay a bigger dividend?

AMAT pays a dividend (0.54% yield), while INTC is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is AMAT or INTC more profitable?

AMAT runs the higher net margin — AMAT at 30.05% versus INTC at -19.79%.

How have AMAT and INTC total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, AMAT delivered 33.13% and INTC delivered 13.32% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) vs Intel Corp. (INTC)

A side-by-side comparison of Applied Materials, Inc. and Intel Corp. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

AMAT

Applied Materials, Inc.

$362.43B

$456.49TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

INTC

Intel Corp.

$519.23B

$102.94TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — AMAT vs INTC

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

AMAT +1588.7% (+32.7%/yr)INTC +228.6% (+12.6%/yr)AMAT compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

AMAT INTC

AMAT vs INTC: by the numbers

•INTC is the larger company ($519.23B vs $362.43B market cap).
•AMAT is profitable (30.05% net margin) while INTC runs a net loss (-19.79%).
•AMAT grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.81% vs -5.97% CAGR).
•AMAT pays a dividend (0.54% yield), while INTC is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	AMAT	INTC
P/E ratio	39.35	N/A
Forward P/E	35.62	68.61
P/S ratio	11.75	9.10
P/B ratio	14.14	5.93
EV / EBITDA	36.53	44.71
FCF yield	1.55%	0.55%

Profitability

Metric	AMAT	INTC
Gross margin	49.40%	38.93%
Operating margin	30.50%	0.14%
Net margin	30.05%	-19.79%
ROE	36.16%	-12.90%
ROIC	23.58%	0.05%

Dividends

Metric	AMAT	INTC
Dividend yield	0.54%	N/A
Payout ratio	21.03%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AMAT	INTC
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	8.81%	-5.97%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	17.13%	-38.58%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	5.66%	-29.55%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	28.17%	15.14%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, AMAT or INTC?: Over the past five years, AMAT grew revenue faster — AMAT at a 8.81% CAGR versus INTC at -5.97%.
Does AMAT or INTC pay a bigger dividend?: AMAT pays a dividend (0.54% yield), while INTC is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is AMAT or INTC more profitable?: AMAT runs the higher net margin — AMAT at 30.05% versus INTC at -19.79%.
How have AMAT and INTC total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, AMAT delivered 33.13% and INTC delivered 13.32% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AMAT analysis Full INTC analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Applied Materials P/E ratio Applied Materials dividend yield Applied Materials ROE Intel ROE Applied Materials operating margin Intel operating margin Applied Materials revenue growth Intel revenue growth Applied Materials free cash flow Intel free cash flow

Applied Materials & Intel appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 10, 2026.