Which has grown faster, AMAT or INTC?

Over the past five years, AMAT grew revenue faster — AMAT at a 9.33% CAGR versus INTC at -7.10%.

Does AMAT or INTC pay a bigger dividend?

AMAT pays a dividend (0.34% yield) while INTC does not currently pay one.

Is AMAT or INTC more profitable?

AMAT runs the higher net margin — AMAT at 29.31% versus INTC at -5.90%.

Which has been the better investment, AMAT or INTC?

Over the past 10-year, AMAT delivered the higher annualized total return — AMAT at 38.64% versus INTC at 17.06%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) vs Intel Corporation (INTC)

AMAT leads on 11 of 13 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Applied Materials, Inc. and Intel Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

AMAT

Applied Materials, Inc.

Total return — AMAT vs INTC

growth of $100 · last 30y

AMAT +12762.8%INTC +1228.0%AMAT compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

AMAT INTC

AMAT vs INTC: by the numbers

•INTC is the larger company ($626.09B vs $450.37B market cap).
•AMAT is profitable (29.31% net margin) while INTC runs a net loss (-5.90%).
•AMAT grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.33% vs -7.10% CAGR).
•AMAT pays a dividend (0.34% yield) while INTC does not currently pay one.

Which is better, AMAT or INTC?

Metric tally: AMAT 11 · INTC 2

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthAMAT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityAMAT(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	AMAT	INTC
P/E ratio	53.31	—
Forward P/E	46.38●	80.98
P/S ratio	15.62	11.78●
P/B ratio	18.96	5.68●
PEG ratio	76.90	—
EV / EBITDA	42.42●	57.97
FCF yield	1.32%	—

Profitability

Metric	AMAT	INTC
Gross margin	48.96%●	35.43%
Operating margin	29.51%●	-9.45%
Net margin	29.31%●	-5.90%
ROE	35.58%●	-2.85%
ROIC	21.96%●	0.00%

Dividends

Metric	AMAT	INTC
Dividend yield	0.34%	—
Payout ratio	21.93%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AMAT	INTC
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.33%●	-7.10%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	17.13%●	-23.79%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	9.02%●	-3.22%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	34.01%●	18.67%

Frequently asked

Which is better, AMAT or INTC?: It depends on your goal. growth: AMAT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: AMAT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, AMAT leads 11 to 2.
Which has grown faster, AMAT or INTC?: Over the past five years, AMAT grew revenue faster — AMAT at a 9.33% CAGR versus INTC at -7.10%.
Does AMAT or INTC pay a bigger dividend?: AMAT pays a dividend (0.34% yield) while INTC does not currently pay one.
Is AMAT or INTC more profitable?: AMAT runs the higher net margin — AMAT at 29.31% versus INTC at -5.90%.
Which has been the better investment, AMAT or INTC?: Over the past 10-year, AMAT delivered the higher annualized total return — AMAT at 38.64% versus INTC at 17.06%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AMAT analysis Full INTC analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Applied Materials P/E ratio Intel P/E ratio Applied Materials dividend yield Intel dividend yield Applied Materials ROE Intel ROE Applied Materials operating margin Intel operating margin Applied Materials revenue growth Intel revenue growth Applied Materials free cash flow Intel free cash flow

Applied Materials & Intel appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks Largest Companies by Market Cap

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.