Which has grown faster, AMAT or INTC?

Over the past five years, AMAT grew revenue faster — AMAT at a 9.33% CAGR versus INTC at -5.97%.

Does AMAT or INTC pay a bigger dividend?

AMAT pays a dividend (0.37% yield), while INTC is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is AMAT or INTC more profitable?

AMAT runs the higher net margin — AMAT at 29.31% versus INTC at -19.79%.

How have AMAT and INTC total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, AMAT delivered 35.87% and INTC delivered 11.96% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) vs Intel Corp. (INTC)

A side-by-side comparison of Applied Materials, Inc. and Intel Corp. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

AMAT

Applied Materials, Inc.

$378.29B

$476.46TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

INTC

Intel Corp.

$433.74B

$86.30TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — AMAT vs INTC

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30y

AMAT +24231.5%INTC +2063.7%AMAT compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

AMAT INTC

AMAT vs INTC: by the numbers

•INTC is the larger company ($433.74B vs $378.29B market cap).
•AMAT is profitable (29.31% net margin) while INTC runs a net loss (-19.79%).
•AMAT grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.33% vs -5.97% CAGR).
•AMAT pays a dividend (0.37% yield), while INTC is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	AMAT	INTC
P/E ratio	48.58	N/A
Forward P/E	42.09	63.04
P/S ratio	14.23	8.20
P/B ratio	17.27	5.34
PEG ratio	76.84	N/A
EV / EBITDA	45.66	55.87
FCF yield	1.44%	0.58%

Profitability

Metric	AMAT	INTC
Gross margin	48.96%	38.60%
Operating margin	29.51%	-0.19%
Net margin	29.31%	-19.79%
ROE	35.58%	-12.90%
ROIC	21.96%	0.00%

Dividends

Metric	AMAT	INTC
Dividend yield	0.37%	N/A
Payout ratio	21.93%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AMAT	INTC
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.33%	-5.97%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	17.13%	-23.79%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	9.02%	-30.04%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	31.94%	12.27%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, AMAT or INTC?: Over the past five years, AMAT grew revenue faster — AMAT at a 9.33% CAGR versus INTC at -5.97%.
Does AMAT or INTC pay a bigger dividend?: AMAT pays a dividend (0.37% yield), while INTC is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is AMAT or INTC more profitable?: AMAT runs the higher net margin — AMAT at 29.31% versus INTC at -19.79%.
How have AMAT and INTC total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, AMAT delivered 35.87% and INTC delivered 11.96% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AMAT analysis Full INTC analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Applied Materials P/E ratio Intel P/E ratio Applied Materials dividend yield Intel dividend yield Applied Materials ROE Intel ROE Applied Materials operating margin Intel operating margin Applied Materials revenue growth Intel revenue growth Applied Materials free cash flow Intel free cash flow

Applied Materials & Intel appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks Largest Companies by Market Cap

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.