Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) vs Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD)
AMAT leads on 9 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Applied Materials, Inc. and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
AMAT
Applied Materials, Inc.
$567.25Technology
AMD
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
$511.57Technology
Total return — AMAT vs AMD
growth of $100 · last 30yAMAT +13247.1%AMD +6245.1%AMAT compounded faster
AMAT AMD
AMAT vs AMD: by the numbers
- •AMD is the larger company ($834.17B vs $450.37B market cap).
- •AMAT trades at the lower earnings multiple (53.31 vs 167.18 P/E).
- •AMAT converts more revenue to profit (29.31% vs 13.37% net margin).
- •AMD grew revenue faster over the past five years (26.80% vs 9.33% CAGR).
- •AMAT pays a dividend (0.34% yield) while AMD does not currently pay one.
Which is better, AMAT or AMD?
Metric tally: AMAT 9 · AMD 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueAMAT(lower P/E)
GrowthAMD(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityAMAT(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | AMAT | AMD |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 53.31● | 167.18 |
| Forward P/E | 46.38 | — |
| P/S ratio | 15.62● | 22.54 |
| P/B ratio | 18.96 | 13.09● |
| PEG ratio | 76.90 | 0.49● |
| EV / EBITDA | 41.89● | 104.18 |
| FCF yield | 1.32%● | 1.02% |
Profitability
| Metric | AMAT | AMD |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 50.28%● |
| Operating margin | 29.51%● | 11.65% |
| Net margin | 29.31%● | 13.37% |
| ROE | 35.58%● | 7.77% |
| ROIC | 21.96%● | 5.40% |
Dividends
| Metric | AMAT | AMD |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.34% | — |
| Payout ratio | 21.93% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AMAT | AMD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.33% | 26.80%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 17.13%● | 4.92% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 9.02% | 37.73%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 34.01% | 44.44%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AMAT or AMD?
- It depends on your goal. value: AMAT (lower P/E); growth: AMD (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: AMAT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, AMAT leads 9 to 6.
- Is AMAT or AMD cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, AMAT is cheaper: AMAT trades at a 53.31 P/E and AMD at 167.18.
- Which has grown faster, AMAT or AMD?
- Over the past five years, AMD grew revenue faster — AMAT at a 9.33% CAGR versus AMD at 26.80%.
- Does AMAT or AMD pay a bigger dividend?
- AMAT pays a dividend (0.34% yield) while AMD does not currently pay one.
- Is AMAT or AMD more profitable?
- AMAT runs the higher net margin — AMAT at 29.31% versus AMD at 13.37%.
- Which has been the better investment, AMAT or AMD?
- Over the past 10-year, AMD delivered the higher annualized total return — AMAT at 38.64% versus AMD at 61.16%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Applied Materials P/E ratioAdvanced Micro Devices P/E ratioApplied Materials dividend yieldAdvanced Micro Devices dividend yieldApplied Materials ROEAdvanced Micro Devices ROEApplied Materials operating marginAdvanced Micro Devices operating marginApplied Materials revenue growthAdvanced Micro Devices revenue growthApplied Materials free cash flowAdvanced Micro Devices free cash flow
Applied Materials & Advanced Micro Devices appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.