NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) vs QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM)
NVDA leads on 11 of 17 compared metrics, though QCOM is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of NVIDIA Corporation and QUALCOMM Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — NVDA vs QCOM
growth of $100 · last 27yNVDA +500157.2%QCOM +5637.7%NVDA compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
NVDA QCOM
NVDA vs QCOM: by the numbers
- •NVDA is the larger company ($4.97T vs $223.15B market cap).
- •QCOM trades at the lower earnings multiple (22.72 vs 31.42 P/E).
- •NVDA converts more revenue to profit (62.97% vs 22.31% net margin).
- •NVDA grew revenue faster over the past five years (68.23% vs 8.63% CAGR).
- •QCOM pays the higher dividend yield (1.70% vs 0.01%).
Which is better, NVDA or QCOM?
Metric tally: NVDA 11 · QCOM 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueQCOM(lower P/E)
GrowthNVDA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeQCOM(higher dividend yield)
QualityNVDA(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | NVDA | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 31.42 | 22.72● |
| Forward P/E | 16.44● | 19.72 |
| P/S ratio | 19.74 | 5.10● |
| P/B ratio | 25.60 | 8.32● |
| PEG ratio | 0.57● | 3.96 |
| EV / EBITDA | 25.96 | 17.18● |
| FCF yield | 2.38% | 5.51%● |
Profitability
| Metric | NVDA | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 74.15%● | 54.80% |
| Operating margin | 64.02%● | 25.52% |
| Net margin | 62.97%● | 22.31% |
| ROE | 81.65%● | 36.38% |
| ROIC | 62.88%● | 13.15% |
Dividends
| Metric | NVDA | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.01% | 1.70%● |
| Payout ratio | 0.61% | 70.95% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | NVDA | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 68.23%● | 8.63% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 85.78%● | 5.74% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 85.52%● | 9.39% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 63.05%● | 11.87% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, NVDA or QCOM?
- It depends on your goal. value: QCOM (lower P/E); growth: NVDA (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: QCOM (higher dividend yield); quality: NVDA (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, NVDA leads 11 to 6.
- Is NVDA or QCOM cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, QCOM is cheaper: NVDA trades at a 31.42 P/E and QCOM at 22.72.
- Which has grown faster, NVDA or QCOM?
- Over the past five years, NVDA grew revenue faster — NVDA at a 68.23% CAGR versus QCOM at 8.63%.
- Does NVDA or QCOM pay a bigger dividend?
- NVDA yields 0.01% and QCOM yields 1.70% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is NVDA or QCOM more profitable?
- NVDA runs the higher net margin — NVDA at 62.97% versus QCOM at 22.31%.
- Which has been the better investment, NVDA or QCOM?
- Over the past 10-year, NVDA delivered the higher annualized total return — NVDA at 68.06% versus QCOM at 17.83%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
NVIDIA P/E ratioQUALCOMM P/E ratioNVIDIA dividend yieldQUALCOMM dividend yieldNVIDIA ROEQUALCOMM ROENVIDIA operating marginQUALCOMM operating marginNVIDIA revenue growthQUALCOMM revenue growthNVIDIA free cash flowQUALCOMM free cash flow
NVIDIA & QUALCOMM appear in these rankings
Related comparisons
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.